Result

About the bid

Assignment description

The Competition concerns the supply of IP equipment, specifically 7 new routers at locations in Europe (inc. UK) to seamlessly exchange the existing Juniper MX routers.Main features of the procedureThe procurement has been carried out as a mini competition under the NORDUnet IP Equipment Supply and Support DPS.

Contact information

Contact name

Michelle Toudal Offersen

Contact phone

+45 51886068

Contact email

michellet@nordu.net

Address

Kastruplundgade 22, 1., 2770 Kastrup

• Total Cost of Ownership (Price)

  70%

  Description

  Price is evaluated using an evaluation key, calculated on the basis of the tenderer’s offered price as set out in Volume 3 – TCO Reply Form. The evaluation key is a technical measure used to compare prices on a common scale, where a lower score reflects a lower total cost. The evaluation key is calculated in the Excel sheet by dividing the total evaluation price by 37,000. Points are awarded on a scale from 0 to 30 points. Tenders with lower evaluation key scores receive more points, while higher scores receive fewer points. Between the defined thresholds, points are calculated using linear interpolation. For further description and for adjustment models see ITT section 5.1.1.

  Evaluation Method

  Points are awarded on a scale from 0 to 30 points. Tenders with lower evaluation key scores receive more points, while higher scores receive fewer points. Between the defined thresholds, points are calculated using linear interpolation.

• Answer to Questions (Quality)

  30%

  Description

  This sub-criterion is evaluated based on the responses provided by the Bidder to the Evaluation Criteria outlined in the document “Volume 2 – Statement of Requirements”. The sub-criterion “Answer to Evaluation Criteria (Quality)” has been further divided into four (4) categories, referred to as part-criteria, each of which is assigned a specific weight as detailed in Table 2 above. Within each category, there are multiple evaluation criteria, each with an individual weight reflecting its relative importance. The weight of the part-criteria and evaluation criteria is listed in the Detailed Scoring Sheet document. Each evaluation criterion will be assessed by the Customer and scored on a scale from 0 to 5, where 0 represents the lowest score and 5 represents the highest, based on the scoring matrix provided in Table 3. The score for each evaluation criterion will then be weighted in accordance with its assigned weight to calculate the overall point score. The maximum total score for all weighted evaluation criteria within this sub-criterion is 30, which corresponds to the total weight of the sub-criterion 'Answer to Evaluation Criteria (Quality).' A total score of 30 represents the highest and most desirable outcome.

  Evaluation Method

  Each evaluation criterion will be assessed by the Customer and scored on a scale from 0 to 5, where 0 represents the lowest score and 5 represents the highest, based on the scoring matrix provided in Table 3. The score for each evaluation criterion will then be weighted in accordance with its assigned weight to calculate the overall point score. The maximum total score for all weighted evaluation criteria within this sub-criterion is 30, which corresponds to the total weight of the sub-criterion 'Answer to Evaluation Criteria (Quality).' A total score of 30 represents the highest and most desirable outcome.

Found no qualification requirements in the contract notice.

See the full notice