Comparative study on best practices for a stronger EU sanction enforcement
Awarded
The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.
- Deadline
- Jan 19,Expired
- Award
- Pris 30%
Brief
The European Commission, DG FISMA - Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, has entered into an agreement with ECORYS EUROPE EEIG - GEIE and RUSI EUROPE for the delivery of services related to a comparative study on best practices for stronger EU sanction enforcement. The study, which has a duration of 18 months, aims to identify best practices and synergies to benefit the Union's sanction policy, drawing lessons from the United States’ Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the United Kingdom sanctions enforcement authority (OFSI). The contract has a final value of 427,948 EUR.
Markeds- og opinionsundersøkelser
Result
- Ecorys Europe EEIG - GEIEWinner
- RUSI EUROPEWinner
- 14Number of bids
- €427,948Contract value
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Award Criteria
Description
Vennligst se anskaffelsesdokumentene.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
Vennligst se anskaffelsesdokumentene.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at European Commission, DG REGIO - Regional and Urban Policy
From the notice
Restrictive measures (sanctions) are an essential tool for the promotion of the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Their objectives include safeguarding the Union’s values, maintaining international peace and security, consolidating and supporting democracy, the rule of law and human rights. The sanctions remain the main instrument in the Union’s toolbox to deter, prevent and condemn aggressive and illiberal behaviour of the third countries. Considering that the lack of sanction implementation, as well as inconsistencies across different jurisdictions of the Union, also represent a risk to Union financial interests and to the national financial systems, it is important to make sure that the Union sanctions are implemented equally across the Union. This is particularly relevant for the implementation of the Union sanctions against Russia, which have been subsequently adopted starting from 2014. In order to curb circumvention of Union sanctions and assist the Member States in their sanction implementation tasks, this pilot project concerns a study on the best practices and synergies that would benefit the Union’s sanction policy, taking stock of the examples of the United States’ Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the United Kingdom sanctions enforcement authority (OFSI). This would help to identify similarities, disparities, best practices and missing elements across all the jurisdictions of the Union. Considering that each Member State nominates a very different set and number of national authorities for the enforcement of Union sanctions (currently at least 160 officially designated), it would be useful to see to what extent having a centralised sanction implementation body would benefit Union sanction implementation, as compared to a network of scattered national bodies. Such a study would help to identify a way for reducing ‘avoidable’ sanction evasion, namely in terms of asset freeze and confiscation and visa and travel bans.
Contact
ec-fisma-contracts@ec.europa.eu- ResultType
- 79311400Main codeEconomic research services
- 73200000Research and development consultancy services79000000Business services: law, marketing, consulting, recruitment, printing and security79300000Market and economic research; polling and statistics79311410Economic impact assessment