DIMOP disszeminációs és kommunikációs feladatok II

Cancelled

The competition has been cancelled.

Brief

Arrangementstjenester

A Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal törölte a DIMOP disszeminációs és kommunikációs feladatok II. elnevezésű beszerzési eljárást, amely reklám- és marketing szolgáltatásokra vonatkozott Budapesten, 6 hónapos időtartamra. Az eljárás három részből állt: kötelező tájékoztatási feladatok, disszeminációs tevékenységek és gyártási feladatok (reklámajándékok, roll-upok és citylight plakátok gyártása). Az eljárást azért törölték, mert minden beérkezett ajánlatot, részvételi kérelmet vagy projektet visszavontak vagy elfogadhatatlannak találtak. Két ajánlat érkezett, a DEKÁD Mérnöki Tanácsadó és Szolgáltató Kft. és a Printhub Hungary Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság részéről.

Result

Reason for cancellation: Alle tilbud, forespørsler å delta eller prosjekter ble trukket tilbake eller funnet inadmissible
Winners
Number of bids: 2
Contract value: Not stated

About the bid

DIMOP Plusz-1.3.7-23 projekthez kapcsolódó disszeminációs és kommunikációs feladatok ellátása a Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal részére, 3 részajánlattételi körben: I. rész: Kötelező tájékoztatás keretében ellátandó kommunikációs feladatok II. rész: Disszeminációs tevékenység keretében ellátandó kommunikációs feladatok III. rész: Gyártás – reklámajándék, roll-up és citylight plakát gyártása

Contact name: Dr. Novák-Soós Zsuzsanna
Contact phone: +36 13734150
Contact email: ki.kpf@nav.gov.hu
Address: Széchenyi Utca 2, 1054 Budapest

Custom Assessment Criteria

Start a free trial to ask your own questions about the tender and get AI-generated answers.

Award Criteria

Description
A felhívás M.2.1) alpont szerinti, teljesítésben résztvevő szakember M.2.1) alpontban meghatározott tapasztalatán felüli szakmai többlettapasztalata (hónap) (min. 0 hónap – max. 12 hónap)
Description
Egyösszegű ajánlati ár (nettó HUF) - Gyártás – reklámajándék, roll-up és citylight plakát gyártása (nettó HUF)

Qualification requirements

Description
The tenderer is unsuitable for fulfilling the contract if they do not have the following references, started within six years (72 months) and completed within three years (36 months) from the date of publication of the call for tenders, in accordance with the regulations and the contract: 1 reference for the production of a video and/or film of at least 20 seconds in length.
Documentation Requirement
The tenderer must provide preliminary proof of compliance with the technical and professional suitability requirements defined by the contracting authority based on Section 65 of the Public Procurement Act, by submitting the ESPD in their tender, in accordance with Chapter II of the Decree. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned for preliminary proof of suitability; therefore, it is sufficient to attach the ESPD, which meets the prescribed conditions, in which the tenderer marks the appropriate answer in the ESPD Part IV: Selection criteria, alpha: General indication of all selection criteria table. In case of a request from the contracting authority under Section 69 (4) of the Public Procurement Act, the data required for assessing suitability and the required method of proof are: Based on Section 21 (3) a) of the Decree, the tenderer must submit a reference statement issued by the tenderer or the organization participating in the proof of suitability, or a reference certificate issued by the other contracting party (in the case of Section 22 (1) b) of the Decree) or a reference certificate issued or signed by the other contracting party (in the case of Section 22 (1) a) of the Decree), regarding the references completed within three years (36 months) from the date of publication of the call for tenders, with at least the following content: a) duration of performance (start and end date with year, month, and day); b) name and registered office of the other contracting party, name and telephone number of the person providing information; c) subject and quantity of the service (in such detail that compliance with the minimum suitability requirement can be unequivocally determined); d) a statement whether the performance was in accordance with the regulations and the contract. If the subject of the contract according to the statement/certificate is broader than the performance required in the suitability requirement, the partial quantity data and technical content related to the suitability requirement must be provided in the statement/certificate. In the case of a statement or certificate for ordering a service performed as a joint tenderer, please indicate the nature of the performance (i.e., whether it relates to a divisible/indivisible service), and if it cannot be issued by separating the services performed by each tenderer due to the indivisibility of the performance, the proportion of participation in the consideration based on the performed service must be indicated (Section 22 (5) of the Decree). The contracting authority, based on Section 21 (3a) a) of the Decree, takes into account references completed within the preceding 3 years (36 months) from the publication of the call for tenders, but started no more than 6 years (72 months) ago. The contracting authority applies Section 21/A of the Decree. When proving technical or professional suitability, the provisions of Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11), (12), and Section 69 (11a) of the Public Procurement Act must also be taken into account. The contracting authority states that in the case of a joint tender, the prescribed suitability requirements may be met jointly by the joint tenderers.

Previous Contract Winners

Start a free trial to see who has won similar tenders for this buyer.

See the full notice

Contracting authority: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal
Title: DIMOP disszeminációs és kommunikációs feladatok II
Type
Main code
Supplemental codes
Location: Budapest
Duration: 6 months

Search