Electronic Signature for for Unified Patent Court (UPC)
Awarded
The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.
IT-rådgivning og strategi
La Cour unifiée du brevet (UPC) a attribué un contrat-cadre à Microsec Ltd. pour la fourniture de services de signature électronique qualifiée. Le contrat porte sur le déploiement d'un nouveau logiciel de signatures électroniques qualifiées. Cinq offres ont été reçues pour ce contrat. L'évaluation des offres s'est basée sur la conformité aux spécifications fonctionnelles de la solution (40%), le service de support (10%) et le prix (50%).
Result
- Winner
- Microsec Ltd.
- Other bidders
- Deloitte Tax & Consulting
- FUJITSU TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS
- LuxTrust S.A.
- Namirial GmbH
- PricewaterhouseCoopers Tax and Advisory
- RCube Professional Services
- Contract value
- Not stated
- Maximum framework agreement value
- Up to €300,000
About the bid
- Contact name
- Public Procurement
- Contact phone
- 621388185
- Contact email
- mathias.pereira@unifiedpatentcourt.org
- Address
- 1, Rue du Fort Thüngen, L1499 Luxembourg
UPC formulates this Request for Proposal to receive Tenders for the deployment of a new software of Qualified Electronic Signatures.
Custom Assessment Criteria
Start a free trial to ask your own questions about the tender and get AI-generated answers.
Award Criteria
Description
This Award Criterion is scored out of a maximum of 40 points. Tenderers are awarded points based on qualitative assessments made by UPC according to the following milestones: • Excellent: 100% • Satisfactory: 75% • Sufficient: 50% • Unsatisfactory: 25% • Inadequate: 0% When analyzed by multiple reviewers, the points awarded for this Award Criterion will be the average between reviewers’ ratings.
Evaluation Method
Tenderers are awarded points based on qualitative assessments made by UPC according to the following milestones:
- Excellent: 100%
- Satisfactory: 75%
- Sufficient: 50%
- Unsatisfactory: 25%
- Inadequate: 0%
When analyzed by multiple reviewers, the points awarded for this Award Criterion will be the average between reviewers’ ratings.
Description
This Award Criterion is scored out of a maximum of 10 points. Tenderers are awarded points based on qualitative assessments made by UPC according to the following milestones: • Excellent: 100% • Satisfactory: 75% • Sufficient: 50% • Unsatisfactory: 25% • Inadequate: 0% When analyzed by multiple reviewers, the points awarded for this Award Criterion will be the average between reviewers’ ratings.
Evaluation Method
Tenderers are awarded points based on qualitative assessments made by UPC according to the following milestones:
- Excellent: 100%
- Satisfactory: 75%
- Sufficient: 50%
- Unsatisfactory: 25%
- Inadequate: 0%
When analyzed by multiple reviewers, the points awarded for this Award Criterion will be the average between reviewers’ ratings.
Description
Tenders with the lowest annual fixed price will obtain the maximum number of points. Tenderers who are not offering the lowest price will receive points inversely proportional to the Tenderer with the lowest price, using the following formula: maximum number of points*(1 - 0.25 *((Tender price - Lowest price) / Lowest price)).
Evaluation Method
Tenders with the lowest annual fixed price will obtain the maximum number of points. Tenderers who are not offering the lowest price will receive points inversely proportional to the Tenderer with the lowest price.
Qualification requirements
Found no qualification requirements in the contract notice.
Previous Contract Winners
Start a free trial to see who has won similar tenders for this buyer.
See the full notice
- Contracting authority
- Unified Patent Court (UPC)
- Title
- Electronic Signature for for Unified Patent Court (UPC)
- Type
- Main code
- Supplemental codes
- Location
- Luxembourg
No supplemental codes from buyer…