Result

About the bid

Assignment description

The scope of the Contract is to provide a new, full-stack Solution regarding Desktop simulators for S-train drivers for DSB to implement in the S-train driver Education Program. The Solution is expected to operate until the new S-trains (driverless) have been implemented, including a period of mixed traffic. However, the scope of this Contract is only the education of drivers for the current S-train type. The new Desktop Simulator Solution is to be used to train new S-train drivers in basic Education, as well as yearly follow-up training for all S-train drivers. The Simulated Environment of the Solution shall prioritize functional fidelity and be able to simulate part of the infrastructure (as Simulated Train Front View), parts of the train (as Simulated Control and Instrument Panel) and parts of the training material (as Simulated Training and Exercise Scenarios) with the functional and physical fidelity defined in appendix 3, Requirement specification. The Solution shall also support DSB’s creation of own Simulated Training Exercises and Scenarios. The Solution should cover the development of a full-stack Solution of Software and Hardware in collaboration with the Customer, possibilities for Further Development, as well as the Support and Maintenance of the Solution and related Services for the duration of the Contract period. DSB aims at implementing the new Solution in the DSB Education Program for courses starting by April 2027. To achieve this, DSB aims for (Partial) Delivery of the required Solution early 2027 which at least covers certain prioritized requirements (see Appendix A, C, 1 and 3), depending on the tenderer’s capacity. The plan and scope of the tender is informed by previous market dialogue (see prior information notice). DSB is open to different delivery models, simulation methods and timelines as reflected in the tender material (cf. appendix 1 and 3) and tender procedure.Main features of the procedure3 applicants are prequalified to submit tendersA negotiated tender is carried out, cf. the tender specifications. The contracting authority will not pay any participation fees to the tenderers. After receiving initial tenders, the contracting authority shall hold individual negotiation meetings with all tenderers who have submitted an initial tender in due time. The negotiations shall be conducted in accordance with the principle of equal treatment, and all tenderers shall be given the same time for negotiations with the contracting authority. In relation to the negotiations, DSB does not consider the following aspects to be fundamental elements pursuant to the Public Procurement Act (reference), which implies that DSB reserves the right to discuss these aspects during negotiations and, if necessary, amend the material on that basis: - Scope and number of priority requirements (market ‘P1’, cf. Appendix 3) - Stated allocation of DSB's estimated resources (cf. Appendix 14) - Subdivision of Support & Maintenance into Hardware and Software (cf. Appendices 7 and 10.a) - Scope and warranties in regard to Support and Maintenance (see Appendices 7 and 10a) - Choice of price regulation index (see Appendix 10) The negotiation process is described in more detail in the tender conditions.

Contact information

Contact name

Thilde Sørensen

Contact phone

+45 24681453

Contact email

thkrsoe@dsb.dk

Address

Telegade 2, 2630 Taastrup

• Cost

  20%

  Description

  Evaluation of the sub criterion “Cost” is based on the total evaluation-technical price cf. Appendix 10.a – Price Specifications. The calculation is based on Appendix 10.a – Price Specifications in accordance with the charges offered by the tenderer.

• Quality of the Solution

  Functionality, process and flow of the Roles (35%) | Simulated Environment - Scope & Durability (35%) | Building and play-out of Simulated Training Exercises and Scenarios (30%)

  40%

  Description

  Evaluation of the sub criterion “Quality of the Solution” is based on the Tenderer’s reply to the following evaluable requirements (appendix 3); ID-4 ("Functionality, process and flow of the Roles" - weighted 35%); ID-42 ("Simulated Environment - Scope & Durability" - weighted 35%); and ID-108 ("Building and play-out of Simulated Training Exercises and Scenarios" - weighted 30%). DSB will conduct an overall evaluation of the Sub sub-criterions based on the Tenderers fulfillment of the requirements in Appendix 3.

  Sub-criteria

  Functionality, process and flow of the Roles

  35%

  Description

  Evaluation based on ID-4 ("Functionality, process and flow of the Roles") in appendix 3.

  Simulated Environment - Scope & Durability

  35%

  Description

  Evaluation based on ID-42 ("Simulated Environment - Scope & Durability") in appendix 3.

  Building and play-out of Simulated Training Exercises and Scenarios

  30%

  Description

  Evaluation based on ID-108 ("Building and play-out of Simulated Training Exercises and Scenarios") in appendix 3.

• Supply Efficiency

  20%

  Description

  Evaluation of the sub sub-criterion "Supply Efficiency" is based on the stated date of the Milestone: “(Partial) Delivery #1 Site Acceptance Test approved” as stated by the Tenderer in appendix 1.b (Supplier’s Time and Activity Plan). DSB will conduct an overall evaluation based on the date of the Milestone and the descriptive scale in Appendix A.

• Delivery

  Supplier’s Time and Activity Plan (50%) | Requirements regarding Supplier’s Project Organization (50%)

  20%

  Description

  Evaluation of the sub criterion “Quality of the Solution” is based on the Tenderer’s reply to the following evaluable requirements in appendix 1, ID-1 ("Supplier’s Time and Activity Plan" - weighted 50%) and in appendix 14, ID-1 ("Requirements regarding Supplier’s Project Organization" - weighted 50%). DSB will conduct an overall evaluation of the Sub sub-criterions based on the Tenderers fulfillment of the requirements in Appendix 1 and 14.

  Sub-criteria

  Supplier’s Time and Activity Plan

  50%

  Description

  Evaluation based on ID-1 ("Supplier’s Time and Activity Plan") in appendix 1.

  Requirements regarding Supplier’s Project Organization

  50%

  Description

  Evaluation based on ID-1 ("Requirements regarding Supplier’s Project Organization") in appendix 14.

• Minimum yearly turnover

  Description

  Applicant's total yearly turnover in the three most recent available financial years. As a minimum requirement, a total yearly turnover of at least DKK 20 million each year in the three most recent available annual reports/financial statements is required. If the applicant relies on the capacity of other entities or in the case of a group of economic operators (eg. such as a consortium), the yearly turnover is calculated as the applicant's and these other entities' total yearly turnover in each of the three most recent available annual reports/financial statements. In the case of a consortium, the yearly turnover is calculated as the companies' total yearly turnover in each of the three most recent available annual reports/financial statements.

  Documentation Requirement

  The information is provided in ESPD section IV.B

See the full notice