Search

  • Search


    "Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"

    ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΣΥΝΗΣ

    "Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"

    1. Competition notice published

      Nov 7, 8:07 AMNovember 7, 2024 8:07 AM
    2. Change in competition

      Nov 12, 11:58 AMNovember 12, 2024 11:58 AM
    3. Change in competition

      Dec 24, 6:10 AMDecember 24, 2024 6:10 AM
    4. Contract signed

      May 20, 12:00 AMMay 20, 2025 12:00 AM
    5. Result notice published

      May 21, 11:46 AMMay 21, 2025 11:46 AM
    6. Change in result

      Jul 10, 5:50 AMJuly 10, 2025 5:50 AM

    Brief

    Greece: Tenders/ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΣΥΝΗΣ/"Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"

    Awarded

    The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.

    Brief

    Markeds- og opinionsundersøkelser

    "Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"

    Result

    Winners
    • ΕΥΡΩΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΟΙ Α.Ε.
    • ΚΑΠΑ RESEARCH-CONSULTING ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΩΝ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΕΩΝ AΝΩΝΥΜΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ
    Number of bids
    1
    Contract value
    €351,000

    About the bid

      "Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"

      Contact name
      ΒΑΣΙΛΕΙΟΣ ΣΤΑΘΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ
      Contact phone
      2131307677
      Contact email
      vstathopoulos@justice.gov.gr
      Address
      Μεσογείων 96, 11527 ΑΘΗΝΑ

    Custom Assessment Criteria

    Start a free trial to ask your own questions about the tender and get AI-generated answers.

    Award Criteria

    • Description

      The overall perception of the Candidate Contractor regarding the project’s scope, goals and objectives, critical success factors, and risks, as well as the ways and methods to address them. The understanding by the Candidate Contractor of the project environment, specifically the stakeholders, beneficiaries, factors that may hinder or accelerate the procedures, and especially the measures that will be taken to leverage stakeholder dynamics for the benefit of the project. The clarity and completeness of the Contractor’s offer regarding the project’s scope and requirements. The clarity and completeness of the analysis of the services offered by the Candidate Contractor. The rational breakdown of the project’s scope into Work Packages and sub-activities, considering the physical object and the implementation timeline. The organization of services into Work Packages, in relation to the proposed methodology, the realism of the approach, and the comprehensive understanding of the project by the Candidate Contractor. The analysis, structure, and organization of the services offered. The realism and justification of the project’s implementation timeline. The detailed depiction of the implementation schedule, including clearly marked milestones and deliverables. The realistic planning of the Candidate Contractor’s services based on the operational requirements of the project. The realistic estimation of the temporal and procedural sequences among the sub-activities, ensuring the timely delivery of all project deliverables.

      Evaluation Method

      Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.

      Sub-criteria

      Description

      The overall perception of the Candidate Contractor regarding the project’s scope, goals and objectives, critical success factors, and risks, as well as the ways and methods to address them. The understanding by the Candidate Contractor of the project environment, specifically the stakeholders, beneficiaries, factors that may hinder or accelerate the procedures, and especially the measures that will be taken to leverage stakeholder dynamics for the benefit of the project. The clarity and completeness of the Contractor’s offer regarding the project’s scope and requirements.

      Evaluation Method

      Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.

      Description

      The clarity and completeness of the analysis of the services offered by the Candidate Contractor. The rational breakdown of the project’s scope into Work Packages and sub-activities, considering the physical object and the implementation timeline. The organization of services into Work Packages, in relation to the proposed methodology, the realism of the approach, and the comprehensive understanding of the project by the Candidate Contractor. The analysis, structure, and organization of the services offered.

      Evaluation Method

      Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.

      Description

      The realism and justification of the project’s implementation timeline. The detailed depiction of the implementation schedule, including clearly marked milestones and deliverables. The realistic planning of the Candidate Contractor’s services based on the operational requirements of the project. The realistic estimation of the temporal and procedural sequences among the sub-activities, ensuring the timely delivery of all project deliverables.

      Evaluation Method

      Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.

    • Description

      The proposed structure and organization of the Project Team. Workflow and coordination between the different specialized sub-teams. The extent to which the duties of the team members meet the project’s needs. The suitability/compatibility of the team’s structure, organization, and operation with the overall management framework (project environment, involved entities). The proposed methodology for establishing an adequate system of communication and coordination among all involved parties. The effectiveness of the communication and collaboration system between the Project Team and the relevant departments and officials of the Contracting Authority, as well as other entities involved in project implementation.

      Evaluation Method

      Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.

      Sub-criteria

      Description

      The proposed structure and organization of the Project Team. Workflow and coordination between the different specialized sub-teams. The extent to which the duties of the team members meet the project’s needs. The suitability/compatibility of the team’s structure, organization, and operation with the overall management framework (project environment, involved entities).

      Evaluation Method

      Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.

      Description

      The proposed methodology for establishing an adequate system of communication and coordination among all involved parties. The effectiveness of the communication and collaboration system between the Project Team and the relevant departments and officials of the Contracting Authority, as well as other entities involved in project implementation.

      Evaluation Method

      Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.

    • Description

      The contract shall be awarded to the most economically advantageous tender based on the best price-quality ratio.

      Evaluation Method

      The most economically advantageous tender is the one with the highest final evaluation score (Ti).

    Qualification requirements

      Found no qualification requirements in the contract notice.

    Previous Contract Winners

    Start a free trial to see who has won similar tenders for this buyer.

    See the full notice

    Contracting authority
    ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΣΥΝΗΣ
    Title
    "Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"
    Type
    ResultPrequalification
    Main code
    79311400Economic research services
    Supplemental codes
    79400000Business and management consultancy and related services
    Location
    Kentrikos Tomeas Athinon, Voreios Tomeas Athinon
    Estimated value
    €357,500.00

    Active similar competitions

    • ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΚΤΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΟ

      Vakttjenester

      Διακήρυξη άνω των ορίων για την ανάθεση της σύμβασης «ΠΑΡΟΧΗ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΩΝ ΦΥΛΑΞΗΣ ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑΚΩΝ ΓΡΑΦΕΙΩΝ & ΑΠΟΘΗΚΕΥΤΙΚΩΝ ΧΩΡΩΝ ΦΥΛΑΞΗΣ ΑΡΧΕΙΩΝ ΤΟΥ Ν.Π.Δ.Δ. ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΚΤΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΟ»

      Το ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΚΤΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΟ χρειάζεται υπηρεσίες φύλαξης για τα περιφερειακά γραφεία, τα υποκαταστήματα, ένα αρχειοφυλακείο και χώρους αποθήκευσης αρχείων (HUB) σε όλη την Ελλάδα, με μέγιστη συνολική αξία 5.713.680 ευρώ για 24 μήνες. Η ανάθεση θα γίνει με βάση την πλέον συμφέρουσα από οικονομική άποψη προσφορά, με κριτήρια ποιότητας (80%) και τιμής (20%). Τα κριτήρια ποιότητας περιλαμβάνουν τη μεθοδολογία υλοποίησης της σύμβασης (35%), τη διασφάλιση ποιότητας (35%) και την τεκμηρίωση μεθοδολογίας επιλογής και εκπαίδευσης προσωπικού/διαδικασίες διοίκησης (30%).

      CompetitionSep 30, 2026
      Nov 3, 2026(25 days)
      €5,713,680
    • Ταμείο Χρηματοδότησης Δικαστικών Κτιρίων (ΤΑΧΔΙΚ)

      Vakttjenester

      «Παροχή υπηρεσιών φύλαξης και ασφάλειας των κτιρίων όπου στεγάζονται υπηρεσίες του Υπουργείου Δικαιοσύνης στην Αθήνα»

      Το Ταμείο Χρηματοδότησης Δικαστικών Κτιρίων (ΤΑΧΔΙΚ) χρειάζεται υπηρεσίες φύλαξης και ασφάλειας για τα κτίρια του Υπουργείου Δικαιοσύνης στην Αθήνα, για περίοδο 2+1 ετών, με εκτιμώμενη συνολική αξία έως 1.294.791,30 € προ Φ.Π.Α. (1.605.541,21 € με Φ.Π.Α.). Η σύμβαση περιλαμβάνει καθημερινή φύλαξη και ασφάλεια δικαστικών κτιρίων στην Αθήνα. Η ανάθεση θα γίνει με βάση την πλέον συμφέρουσα από οικονομική άποψη προσφορά, κρινόμενη από τη βέλτιστη σχέση ποιότητας-τιμής.

      CompetitionSep 30, 2026
      Oct 9, 2026(0 days)
      €1,294,791
    • Γ.Ν. ΕΛΕΥΣΙΝΑΣ ''ΘΡΙΑΣΙΟ''

      Systemutvikling og programmering

      ΔΙΑΚΗΡΥΞΗ 33/2026

      Το Γ.Ν. ΕΛΕΥΣΙΝΑΣ ''ΘΡΙΑΣΙΟ'' χρειάζεται υπηρεσίες ανάπτυξης λογισμικού διαχείρισης εγκαταστάσεων και πλατφόρμες υπηρεσιών ανάπτυξης λογισμικού, οι οποίες θα παραδοθούν στη Δυτική Αττική. Η BRIDGIT ΙΚΕ έχει σήμερα μια παρόμοια σύμβαση. Τα κριτήρια ανάθεσης βασίζονται στη χαμηλότερη τιμή.

      CompetitionSep 15, 2026
      Oct 16, 2026(7 days)
    • Οργανισμός Διασφάλισης της Ποιότητας στην Υγεία ΑΕ

      Brann- og sikkerhetstjenester

      Παροχή Υπηρεσιών Ανεξάρτητου Ελεγκτή για τη διενέργεια ελέγχου ολοκλήρωσης Έργων της Δράσης 16820 του Ταμείου Ανάκαμψης και Ανθεκτικότητας» με κωδικό ΟΠΣ (MIS): 5225224, της Δράσης 16753 - ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΚΑΤ'ΟΙΚΟΝ ΝΟΣΗΛΕΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΠΕΡΙΘΑΛΨΗΣ

      Ο Οργανισμός Διασφάλισης της Ποιότητας στην Υγεία ΑΕ χρειάζεται υπηρεσίες ανεξάρτητου ελεγκτή για τη διενέργεια ελέγχου ολοκλήρωσης Έργων της Δράσης 16820 του Ταμείου Ανάκαμψης και Ανθεκτικότητας και της Δράσης 16753 - ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΚΑΤ'ΟΙΚΟΝ ΝΟΣΗΛΕΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΠΕΡΙΘΑΛΨΗΣ, με μέγιστη συνολική αξία 95.000 ευρώ και διάρκεια 3 μηνών. Οι υπηρεσίες θα παρασχεθούν στον Κεντρικό Τομέα Αθηνών. Η AUDIT OPINION ΟΡΚΩΤΟΙ ΕΛΕΓΚΤΕΣ Ι.Κ.Ε. έχει παρόμοια σύμβαση σήμερα. Τα κριτήρια ανάθεσης είναι η κατανόηση περιβάλλοντος και ειδικών απαιτήσεων (30%), η μεθοδολογία υλοποίησης και ποιότητα υπηρεσιών (20%) και η οργάνωση διοίκησης της Σύμβασης και Ομάδα Έργου (50%).

      CompetitionSep 21, 2026
      Oct 29, 2026(20 days)
      €95,000
    • Οργανισμός Διαχείρισης και Ανάπτυξης Πολιτιστικών Πόρων (Ο.Δ.Α.Π.)

      Rekruttering og bemanning

      ΔΙΑΚΗΡΥΞΗ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟΥ ΗΛΕΚΤΡΟΝΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΥ ΜΕΣΩ ΕΣΗΔΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗN ΠΑΡΟΧΗ ΒΟΗΘΗΤΙΚΩΝ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΩΝ ΥΠΟΣΤΗΡΙΞΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΚΔΟΣΗΣ ΜΙΣΘΟΔΟΣΙΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΥΠΑΛΛΗΛΩΝ ΤΟΥ Ο.Δ.Α.Π.

      Ο Οργανισμός Διαχείρισης και Ανάπτυξης Πολιτιστικών Πόρων (Ο.Δ.Α.Π.) χρειάζεται βοηθητικές υπηρεσίες υποστήριξης για την έκδοση της μισθοδοσίας των υπαλλήλων του, για διάστημα 31 μηνών, με μέγιστη συνολική αξία 180.000 ευρώ. Οι υπηρεσίες θα παρασχεθούν στον Κεντρικό Τομέα Αθηνών. Το κριτήριο ανάθεσης είναι η πλέον συμφέρουσα από οικονομική άποψη προσφορά βάσει βέλτιστης σχέσης ποιότητας – τιμής.

      CompetitionSep 28, 2026
      Nov 18, 2026(40 days)
      €180,000