"Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"
Awarded
The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.
Markeds- og opinionsundersøkelser
"Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"
Result
- Winners
- ΕΥΡΩΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΟΙ Α.Ε.
- ΚΑΠΑ RESEARCH-CONSULTING ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΩΝ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΕΩΝ AΝΩΝΥΜΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ
- Number of bids
- 1
- Contract value
- €351,000
About the bid
- Contact name
- ΒΑΣΙΛΕΙΟΣ ΣΤΑΘΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ
- Contact phone
- 2131307677
- Contact email
- vstathopoulos@justice.gov.gr
- Address
- Μεσογείων 96, 11527 ΑΘΗΝΑ
"Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"
Custom Assessment Criteria
Start a free trial to ask your own questions about the tender and get AI-generated answers.
Award Criteria
Description
The overall perception of the Candidate Contractor regarding the project’s scope, goals and objectives, critical success factors, and risks, as well as the ways and methods to address them. The understanding by the Candidate Contractor of the project environment, specifically the stakeholders, beneficiaries, factors that may hinder or accelerate the procedures, and especially the measures that will be taken to leverage stakeholder dynamics for the benefit of the project. The clarity and completeness of the Contractor’s offer regarding the project’s scope and requirements. The clarity and completeness of the analysis of the services offered by the Candidate Contractor. The rational breakdown of the project’s scope into Work Packages and sub-activities, considering the physical object and the implementation timeline. The organization of services into Work Packages, in relation to the proposed methodology, the realism of the approach, and the comprehensive understanding of the project by the Candidate Contractor. The analysis, structure, and organization of the services offered. The realism and justification of the project’s implementation timeline. The detailed depiction of the implementation schedule, including clearly marked milestones and deliverables. The realistic planning of the Candidate Contractor’s services based on the operational requirements of the project. The realistic estimation of the temporal and procedural sequences among the sub-activities, ensuring the timely delivery of all project deliverables.
Evaluation Method
Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.
Sub-criteria
Description
The overall perception of the Candidate Contractor regarding the project’s scope, goals and objectives, critical success factors, and risks, as well as the ways and methods to address them. The understanding by the Candidate Contractor of the project environment, specifically the stakeholders, beneficiaries, factors that may hinder or accelerate the procedures, and especially the measures that will be taken to leverage stakeholder dynamics for the benefit of the project. The clarity and completeness of the Contractor’s offer regarding the project’s scope and requirements.
Evaluation Method
Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.
Description
The clarity and completeness of the analysis of the services offered by the Candidate Contractor. The rational breakdown of the project’s scope into Work Packages and sub-activities, considering the physical object and the implementation timeline. The organization of services into Work Packages, in relation to the proposed methodology, the realism of the approach, and the comprehensive understanding of the project by the Candidate Contractor. The analysis, structure, and organization of the services offered.
Evaluation Method
Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.
Description
The realism and justification of the project’s implementation timeline. The detailed depiction of the implementation schedule, including clearly marked milestones and deliverables. The realistic planning of the Candidate Contractor’s services based on the operational requirements of the project. The realistic estimation of the temporal and procedural sequences among the sub-activities, ensuring the timely delivery of all project deliverables.
Evaluation Method
Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.
Description
The proposed structure and organization of the Project Team. Workflow and coordination between the different specialized sub-teams. The extent to which the duties of the team members meet the project’s needs. The suitability/compatibility of the team’s structure, organization, and operation with the overall management framework (project environment, involved entities). The proposed methodology for establishing an adequate system of communication and coordination among all involved parties. The effectiveness of the communication and collaboration system between the Project Team and the relevant departments and officials of the Contracting Authority, as well as other entities involved in project implementation.
Evaluation Method
Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.
Sub-criteria
Description
The proposed structure and organization of the Project Team. Workflow and coordination between the different specialized sub-teams. The extent to which the duties of the team members meet the project’s needs. The suitability/compatibility of the team’s structure, organization, and operation with the overall management framework (project environment, involved entities).
Evaluation Method
Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.
Description
The proposed methodology for establishing an adequate system of communication and coordination among all involved parties. The effectiveness of the communication and collaboration system between the Project Team and the relevant departments and officials of the Contracting Authority, as well as other entities involved in project implementation.
Evaluation Method
Each criterion is scored from 100 points, where all terms of the technical specifications are exactly met, and up to 150 points where the requirements are exceeded. Each criterion is scored independently based on the contents of the bid. The weighted score of each criterion is calculated as the product of its weighting factor and its score. The overall technical score of the offer is the sum of the weighted scores of all criteria. Offers with a score lower than 100 for any criterion (i.e., that do not meet or significantly deviate from the technical specifications) shall be rejected.
Description
The contract shall be awarded to the most economically advantageous tender based on the best price-quality ratio.
Evaluation Method
The most economically advantageous tender is the one with the highest final evaluation score (Ti).
Qualification requirements
Found no qualification requirements in the contract notice.
Previous Contract Winners
Start a free trial to see who has won similar tenders for this buyer.
See the full notice
- Contracting authority
- ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΣΥΝΗΣ
- Title
- "Open International Electronic Tender for the Provision of Support Services for the Office of Judicial Statistics Collection and Processing (JustStat) of the Ministry of Justice"
- Type
- Main code
- Supplemental codes
- Location
- Kentrikos Tomeas Athinon, Voreios Tomeas Athinon
- Estimated value
- €357,500.00