Responsible Gaming Solution
Awarded
The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.
- Deadline
- Nov 10, 2025Expired
- Award
- Quality 50%
Brief
Veikkaus Oy har inngått en avtale med Neccton om å levere en løsning for ansvarlig spill (Responsible Gaming Solution) som en tjeneste. Løsningen skal leveres som Software as a Service (SaaS) og omfatter nødvendige lisenser, programvare, relevante integrasjoner, testmiljøer, implementering, støtte- og vedlikeholdstjenester samt opplæring. Avtalen har en fast varighet på 24 måneder fra signeringsdatoen, og vil deretter fortsette på ubestemt tid, med en total verdi på 1 400 000 euro. Det var 5 leverandører som deltok i konkurransen.
IT- drift og vedlikehold
Result
- NecctonWinner
- 5Number of bids
- €1,400,000Contract value
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Award Criteria
Description
The cheapest offer gets full points according to the weight value, and the points of others are proportional to the offer of the lowest tenderer using the formula: (minimum given value by any tenderer / offered value) * 50 points
Evaluation Method
The cheapest offer gets full points according to the weight value, and the points of others are proportional to the offer of the lowest tenderer.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
Quality: 50 total points, divided into sections: Annex 2 Requirements maximum 15 points, Annex 3 Tenderer´s references maximum 15 points, Preliminary implementation project plan evaluation maximum 10 points, Solution description evaluation maximum 10 points.
Evaluation Method
Quality is evaluated based on Annex 2 Requirements, Annex 3 Tenderer´s references, Preliminary implementation project plan, and Solution description.
Sub-criteria
- Annex 2 Requirements15%
The maximum quality points for Requirements is 15 points.
Evaluation Method: Tenderer´s comparison points will be calculated using formula: Tenderer´s points received / The highest points given to any tenderer * 15
- Annex 3 Tenderer´s references15%
The maximum quality points for References is 15 points.
Evaluation Method: Tenderer´s comparison points will be calculated using formula: Tenderer´s points received / The highest points given to any tenderer * 15
- Preliminary implementation project plan10%
Project plan will be evaluated as stated in Annex 1 Procurement Description chapter 6.2. Maximum 10 points.
Evaluation Method: Tenderer´s comparison points will be calculated using formula: Tenderer´s points received / The highest points given to any tenderer * 10
- Solution description10%
Solution description will be evaluated as stated in Annex 1 Procurement Description chapter 6.3. Maximum 10 points.
Evaluation Method: Tenderer´s comparison points will be calculated using formula: Tenderer´s points received / The highest points given to any tenderer * 10
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Veikkaus Oy
From the notice
Veikkaus is requesting tenders for a Responsible Gaming Detection and Monitoring Solution (RG Solution) Veikkaus will select one supplier to provide RG Solution as a Service. The offered solution shall be a fully functional RG Solution provided as a Service according to the requirements and descriptions set out in the Call for Tender documents. The offered solution contains the full implementation of a Responsible Gaming Solution delivered as a Software as a Service (SaaS), covering at least the following: Necessary licenses Software Relevant integrations Testing environments Implementation Support and maintenance services Training The Agreement is fixed term and definite in duration for 24 months after the signing date of the Agreement. After the conclusion of the fixed-term Agreement will continue in force for an indefinite period.Main features of the procedure1. GENERAL The legislation concerning the public procurement is applied to the procurement. Type of procedure is open procedure. 2. CONTRACT NOTICE A contract notice has been published on the website www.hankintailmoitukset.fi and http://ted.europa.eu. The contract award notice shall be published after the award decision. 3. SUBMITTING THE TENDER AS A GROUP OF ECONOMIC OPERATORS AND SUBCONTRACTING The tenderer may submit the tender as a group of economic operators. In this case, however, it is required that the enterprises that belong to the group undertake with joint liability to fulfill the obligations and responsibilities of the contract. If the group is awarded with the contract, all group members shall sign the contract. The members of the group may not be changed during the procurement procedure or contract period. The group and the supplier with subcontractors is required to have the technical, economic and financial and other capacities to provide the goods and services in accordance with the contract for the whole contract period. During the tender competition and during the contract period, the supplier may be requested to provide proof on commitments and contracts that they have made with the notified subcontractors and which may affect the supplier’s capacity to meet the obligations of the contract. The group may be requested to provide corresponding proof on how the relationships between the members of the group have been arranged. If the tenderer uses subcontractors, it shall be responsible for the work of its subcontractors as of their own work. If the tenderer participates in the procurement process independently, using the services of its subcontractors as a part of its tender and being responsible for their work, the tenderer must state in the Subcontractors form how the subcontractor participates in producing the service. During the contract period, replacing subcontractors is possible only if it does not result to significant or material changes of the contract, and only with the consent of the contracting authority. 4. USING RESOURCES OF OTHER ENTITIES The tenderer or a group of economic operators may use the resources of other entities to fulfill the requirements of the invitation to tender without taking into account the legal nature of their relationship. The resources of other entities must be de facto at the disposal of the tenderer or the group of economic operators during the procurement process and the contract period. Such resources may include, for example: 1) Relying professional experience of other economic entity, which for example belong to the same group of companies, provided that this entity is named in the tender as a subcontractor for the tenderer or the group of economic operators, and it de facto participates in supplying the service; 2) the use of other company's personnel to fulfill the requirements concerning professional qualifications, provided that these persons de facto participate in supplying the service; 3) resources concerning economic and financial standing; 4) resources concerning technical capabilities, provided that such resources are de facto utilized to fulfill the requirements of the procurement. 5. PROCESSING OF TENDERS 5.1 SUITABILITY OF TENDERS Before the tenders are processed it shall be assessed whether the tenderers meet the technical, professional and economic and financial requirements presented in clause/form "Exclusion and suitability (ESPD)". The tenderer’s suitability shall be examined using the information provided in the tender, other financial statements (if separately requested) and the information available from risk rating reports. Tenderers who do not meet the minimum requirements set in the Call for Tenders shall be excluded from the tender competition. A tenderer who has been convicted of or in which any person with powers of representation, decision making or control has been convicted of an offence as referred in EU Public Procurement Directive 57 article, section 1 or to extortionate work discrimination as stated in the Criminal Code of Finland, chapter 47 section 3(a) shall also be excluded from the tender competition. A tenderer to whom a criterion for exclusion as referred to in Public Procurement Act may also be excluded from the tender competition. 5.2 COMPLIANCE OF TENDERS WITH THE CALL FOR TENDERS The solution and services tendered shall comply with the content of the Call for Tenders and its annexes. All the requested information and required annexes must be annexed to the tender. In examining the compliance of the tender the tender is assessed based on the entire content of the tender. Tenders that are not in compliance with the Call for Tenders or in accordance with the conditions of the tendering procedure shall be excluded from the tender competition. 5.3 EVALUATION OF TENDERS The evaluation of the tenders shall be made according to chapter "Grounds for decision". 5.4 AWARD DECISION AND ITS NOTIFICATION The award decision shall be sent for the information of all the tenderers via email. The contract does not come into force as a result of the notification of the decision, but requires a separate written contract.
Contact
Procurementhankinnat@veikkaus.fi- ResultType
- 72000000Main codeIT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
- 48000000Software package and information systems
- 72260000Software-related services72266000Software consultancy services72267100Maintenance of information technology software