Search
  • Search
    Finland: Tenders/Forum Virium Helsinki/Smart City Pilot Project Grants

    1. Competition notice published

      Feb 28, 2023 10:00 AMFebruary 28, 2023 10:00 AM

    2. Express interest deadline

      Mar 31, 2023 4:00 PMMarch 31, 2023 4:00 PM

    3. Qualification deadline

      Not stated

    4. Tender submission deadline

      Mar 31, 2023 4:00 PMMarch 31, 2023 4:00 PM

    Brief

    Smart City Pilot Project Grants

    Published deadline passed

    The published deadline has passed. For multi-stage competitions a later tender deadline may still apply — check the notice or portal for the current phase.

    Qualification deadline
    Mar 31, 2023Expired
    Procedure
    OpenTwo stages

    Brief

    Register interest

    Custom Assessment Criteria

    • Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria

      Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender

    Will you bid?

    The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.

    Award Criteria

    • Description

      Does the proposal demonstrate who will benefit from the implementation of the solution and what is the desired outcome? Does the proposal demonstrate how urgent are the addressed needs? Does the proposal demonstrate how the solution impacts the life of hard-to-reach communities? Does the proposal demonstrate how the quality of the output and/or impact be measured? Does the solution have the ability to scale-up or be replicated in other regions? How well is this demonstrated in the application?

      Evaluation Method

      Each evaluation criterion presented below is scored on a scale of 0–5 points.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      What is the quality and effectiveness of the work plan: Does the description of measures, timetables and resources demonstrate that the solution can be implemented in a high-quality manner, within the given timeframe? Is it demonstrated that the pilot is feasible within the CommuniCity grant of 12.500 Euro? If not, can the Applicant demonstrate that it has additional resources to make it feasible? Does the proposal demonstrate sufficient competence and resources? Has the Piloting Lead the required capacities? Does the proposal demonstrate what are the other partnership arrangements, for example, the subcontractors and collaboration with the relevant associations?

      Evaluation Method

      Each evaluation criterion presented below is scored on a scale of 0–5 points.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      Does the proposal demonstrate that the solution proposed meets the objectives of the CommuniCity Open Call? Does the proposal demonstrate that the solution has novelty value and innovative qualities and what they are? Does the proposal demonstrate that it is new to the markets, or that it has already been demonstrated in a relevant environment? Does the proposal demonstrate that the solution is feasible given the technology features and maturity? Does the proposal demonstrate that it fulfils the technical specifications of the challenge? Does the proposal demonstrate that the solution is sound and that the methodology is credible?

      Evaluation Method

      Each evaluation criterion presented below is scored on a scale of 0–5 points.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      Does the proposal demonstrate that there has been involvement between the target group (or their representatives) and the Applicant to discuss the proposed solution? Does the proposal demonstrate that the proposed solution is based on a problem identified by this target group? Does the proposal demonstrate what the level and form of involvement of the target group in different phases of the pilot are? Does the proposal demonstrate what is the previous experience in co-creating/working with target groups? Does the proposal demonstrate co-creation and/or co-learning methodologies applied and if they are, what are they?

      Evaluation Method

      Each evaluation criterion presented below is scored on a scale of 0–5 points.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    Previous winners

    • Who are you up against?

      The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Forum Virium Helsinki

    From the notice

    • Contact

      Anne-Mari Sandellanne-mari.sandell@forumvirium.fi
    • Type
      Competition · Prequalification
    • Main code
      Experimental development services
      73120000

    Similar active competitions

    • KENTRO MELETON ASFALEIAS

      Forsknings- og utviklingsvirksomhet og tilhørende konsulenttjenester

      Pre-CommerciAl ProCuremenT of Innovative Personal ProtectiVe Equipment for First REsponders (ACTIVE PCP)

      KENTRO MELETON ASFALEIAS (KEMEA) needs R&D services for innovative Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for first responders, police, firefighters, and emergency medical services operating in complex CBRN and HAZMAT environments. The project, named ACTIVE PCP, aims to address critical gaps in PPE and guide industry R&D towards solutions. The procurement is structured as a Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) with three competitive phases: Phase 1 (Solution Design), Phase 2 (Prototyping), and Phase 3 (Original development and testing). The total maximum budget for this PCP is 3,650,000 EUR, including VAT, taxes, and other related fees and costs, over a duration of 21 months. The maximum budget per contractor for Phase 1 is 47,043 EUR, for Phase 2 is 483,870.97 EUR, and for Phase 3 is 604,838.71 EUR. The services will be delivered in Kentrikos Tomeas Athinon, Vilniaus apskritis, Radomski, and Kýpros. Offers will be evaluated based on quality (80%) and financial offer (20%).

      Framework agreement
      Dec 14, 2026(45 days)
      €2,943,548

    • Stadt Sankt Augustin

      Prosjekteringstjenester

      Ingenieurleistungen

      Die Stadt Sankt Augustin benötigt Ingenieurleistungen für die Leistungsphasen 5 bis 8, die örtliche Bauleitung sowie die Auswertung der TV-Inspektion im Zuge der Gewährleistungsabnahme für die Kanalsanierung in Sankt Augustin Menden. Dies umfasst etwa 13,5 km Haltungslänge und ca. 370 Schächte. Die Sanierung erfolgt mittels Schlauchlinern, Robotern und händisch. Die Vergabe erfolgt auf Basis von Preis (40 %) und Qualität (60 %). Für die Qualifikation sind eine marktübliche Berufs-/Betriebshaftpflichtversicherung mit Deckungssummen von mindestens 3.000.000 EUR für Personenschäden und 300.000 EUR für Sach- und Vermögensschäden, mindestens drei Referenzen über vergleichbare Aufträge der Leistungsphasen 5 bis 9 gemäß HOAI für Kanalinnensanierung in ähnlicher Größenordnung aus den letzten fünf Jahren, eine Erklärung zur durchschnittlichen jährlichen Beschäftigtenzahl der letzten drei Jahre (gegliedert nach Ingenieuren, technischen und sonstigen Mitarbeitern), eine Beschreibung der technischen Ausrüstung mit Planungssoftware für Kanalinnensanierung, CAD-Software (kompatibel mit AutoCAD) und AVA-Software (kompatibel mit itwo für GAEB 2000), sowie der Nachweis der Eintragung in einem Berufs- oder Handelsregister erforderlich. Zudem muss die Projektleitung eine Berechtigung als Beratender Ingenieur oder Ingenieur nach nordrhein-westfälischem Landesrecht, ein aktuelles Zertifikat als Zertifizierter Kanal-Sanierungs-Beratender, mindestens 5 Jahre Berufserfahrung in der Kanalinnensanierungsplanung und mindestens 2 Referenzprojekte sowie fachkundige deutsche Sprachkenntnisse (Niveau C1 GER) vorweisen.

      Competition
      Nov 11, 2026(12 days)

    • Métropole européenne de Lille

      Anleggs- og infrastrukturbygging

      Travaux de voirie métropolitains – 32 lots

      La Métropole européenne de Lille a besoin de travaux de voirie métropolitains, répartis en 32 lots, pour une durée de 4 ans dans le département du Nord. Les critères d'attribution sont le prix (70%, dont 45% pour le montant du détail estimatif de l'accord-cadre et 25% pour un détail estimatif masqué), la valeur technique (20%, incluant la pertinence des dispositions pour les interventions urgentes, l'information sur le marquage piquetage, les bilans bimensuels et la sécurité des chantiers) et la valeur environnementale (10%, incluant la mutualisation des transports, l'utilisation d'engins à faibles émissions, la gestion des déchets et la réduction du bruit/des poussières).

      Framework agreement
      Oct 30, 2026(0 days)