Search
  • Search
Hungary: Tenders/Budapest Airport Budapest Liszt Ferenc Nemzetközi Repülőtér Üzemeltető Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság/Tervezési keretmegállapodás - repülőtér fejlesztés

  1. Competition notice published

    Jun 26, 9:37 AMJune 26, 2026 9:37 AM

  2. Change in competition

    Jul 27, 5:55 AMJuly 27, 2026 5:55 AM

  3. Change in competition

    Aug 5, 6:40 AMAugust 5, 2026 6:40 AM

  4. Change in competition

    Aug 19, 4:19 AMAugust 19, 2026 4:19 AM

  5. Qualification deadline

    Aug 31, 1:00 PMAugust 31, 2026 1:00 PM

  6. Tender submission deadline

    Comes with the invitation

Brief

Tervezési keretmegállapodás - repülőtér fejlesztés

Published deadline passed

The published deadline has passed. For multi-stage competitions a later tender deadline may still apply — check the notice or portal for the current phase.

Qualification deadline
Aug 31,Expired
Award
Szakmai ajánlat (BIM, Fenntarthatóság) 10% and 6 more
Agreement
Framework agreementover 8 years

Brief

A Budapest Airport Zrt. tervezési szolgáltatásokat keres egy 8 éves keretmegállapodás keretében a Liszt Ferenc repülőtér hosszú távú fejlesztési programjához, Pest megyében. A szolgáltatások magukban foglalják a generáltervezést, amely legalább az építészeti, tartószerkezeti, épületgépészeti, épületvillamossági, közlekedési és közmű szakágakra kiterjedő tervdokumentáció elkészítését foglalja magában. Az értékelési szempontok a következők: ár (45%), különleges szolgáltatások napidíjai (5%), szakmai ajánlat (BIM, Fenntarthatóság) (10%), M.2.1. szakember többlettapasztalata nemzetközi kereskedelmi repülőtér utasterminál épületének tervezésében (10%), M.2.2. szakember többlettapasztalata nemzetközi kereskedelmi repülőtér utasterminál épületének tervezésében (10%), M.2.3. szakember többlettapasztalata nemzetközi kereskedelmi repülőtér utasterminál épületének tervezésében (5%), M.2.4. szakember többlettapasztalata nemzetközi kereskedelmi repülőtér utasterminál épületének tervezésében (5%), és zöldminősítési szakértő bevonása (10%). A pályázóknak rendelkezniük kell az illetékes országos szakmai kamara névjegyzékében való szerepléssel, az elmúlt három lezárt üzleti évben legalább 7.500.000 EUR generáltervezési árbevétellel, valamint referenciákkal legalább 20.000 m2 ipari/raktár/logisztikai épület, 10.000 m2 közhasználatú épület, 10.000 m2 utasforgalmi létesítmény, és 2500 m2 zöldminősítésű épület generáltervezésére vonatkozóan. Ezen felül rendelkezniük kell legalább egy "É", "G", "V", "T" jogosultsággal rendelkező tervező szakemberrel, akik további 36 hónap szakmai tapasztalattal rendelkeznek, valamint egy legalább 12 hónap BIM menedzseri tapasztalattal rendelkező szakemberrel.

Arkitekttjenester

Register interest

Custom Assessment Criteria

  • Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria

    Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender

Will you bid?

The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.

Qualification requirements

  • Description

    The tenderer must be registered in the national professional chamber (MMK or MÉK) competent for the subject of the design service, or, in the case of economic operators not established in Hungary, the tenderer must apply Section 8 (2) of Government Decree 322/2015 (X.30.). The tenderer is unsuitable if they are not registered in the national professional chamber competent for the subject of the design service related to the construction investment, or, in the case of economic operators not established in Hungary, if they are not registered in the register of the country of establishment, or do not possess the permit, license, or organizational/chamber membership required in the country of establishment.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the bid on behalf of the joint tenderers. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. For economic operators established in Hungary, the contracting authority verifies the fact of registration based on the data of the register of the national professional chamber competent for the subject of the design or engineering service related to the construction investment. For economic operators not established in Hungary, proof (extract) from the registers listed in Annex XI of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, or other proof, or a declaration must be submitted as proof upon the contracting authority's request, also considering Section 1 (2)-(5) of the Government Decree. The fact of registration in the registers – if the relevant data or facts cannot be freely verified in the register according to Section 69 (11) of the Public Procurement Act – must be proven by submitting a simple copy of the register extract, a certificate issued by the registering authority, or a document proving the fact of registration, upon the contracting authority's request. Sections 65 (6)-(7); (9); (11) and 69 (11)-(11a) of the Public Procurement Act are also applicable to the proof of suitability.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if their total turnover from the subject of the public procurement (general design service) – calculated without VAT – in the last three closed business years preceding the publication of the invitation to participate did not reach 7,500,000 EUR. Under general design service, the contracting authority means a service covering the preparation of design documentation for at least architectural, structural, building mechanical, building electrical, transport, and utility branches.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. The contracting authority draws the attention of tenderers to Section 1 (7) of the Government Decree. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must attach a simple declaration of the turnover calculated without VAT from the subject of the public procurement (general design service) for the last three closed business years preceding the publication of the invitation to participate, depending on when the tenderer (applicant) was established or started its operation, if these data are available. Joint applicants may collectively meet the prescribed suitability requirements. In the case of a joint application, if any of the joint applicants can independently fulfill the suitability requirement according to point P/1, it is sufficient for that joint applicant to attach the declaration according to point P/1. If the tenderer (applicant) started its operation later (and therefore does not have turnover data according to the subject of the public procurement in the previous three closed business years), the total net turnover according to the subject of the public procurement for the business years since the start of its activity must reach the prescribed amount. If the tenderer (applicant) presents fewer than three closed business years in its declaration, but compliance with the suitability requirement can be determined from it, the contracting authority will not order a deficiency remedy regarding the unpresented closed business year/years. The contracting authority draws attention to the possibilities contained in Section 19 (3) of the Government Decree regarding the proof of the suitability condition. Sections 65 (6)-(8), (11)-(12) of the Public Procurement Act and Section 19 (7) of the Government Decree are applicable. Further information regarding the method of proof can be found in the public procurement documents.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have references for general design work (preparation of design documentation covering at least architectural, structural, building mechanical, building electrical, transport, and utility branches) for an industrial and/or warehouse and/or storage and/or logistics building with a net floor area of at least 20,000 m2, completed within 6 years (72 months) preceding the publication of the invitation to participate.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must describe their most significant completed services from the 6 years (72 months) preceding the publication of the invitation to participate, according to Section 21 (3) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.) – considering Section 21 (3a) b) – with at least the following content: - time of completion (start and end dates of completion, with year/month/day accuracy), - name, address of the other contracting party, name, contact details (phone and/or email address) of the person providing the information/reference, - detailed description of the subject of the service, allowing the assessment of compliance with the suitability requirement, - quantity of completion (m2), - proportion of own completion (%), (if applicable, in case of completion as a joint tenderer), - declaration whether the completion was in accordance with the specifications and the contract. If the completion was not in accordance with the contract, the reason and extent of the deviation, as well as the fact of the economic operator's breach of contract, if any, must be described in the certificate or declaration. If the proof of suitability is made by a declaration of the tenderer, the applicant, or another organization participating in the proof of suitability, the declaration must also state whether the other contracting party disputes the contractual nature of the completion or – if the economic operator has declared this – the circumstance that the economic operator is not liable for the breach of contract. The date of completion must fall within the examined period. The contracting authority stipulates, based on Section 21 (3a) b) of the Government Decree, that services completed within the examined period, but started no more than 9 years ago, may be taken into account for the proof of reference. Attention is drawn to the application of Section 21/A, Section 22 (1)-(2)-(4), Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree; Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12), Section 67 (3), Section 69 (11)-(11a) and Section 140 (9) of the Public Procurement Act. Joint tenderers (joint applicants) may meet the prescribed suitability requirements according to Section 65 (6) of the Public Procurement Act. The tenderer (applicant) may also meet the prescribed suitability requirement by relying on the capacity of any other organization (person) in accordance with Section 65 (7) of the Public Procurement Act. The entity providing its capacities must prove compliance with the given suitability condition in the same way as the prescribed methods of proof, and must also declare that the resources necessary for the performance of the contract will be available during the term of the contract. Compliance with one requirement can be proven with a maximum of 2 references in cases M.1.1-M.1.2, and a maximum of 1 reference in cases M.1.3-M.1.4. The contracting authority considers it one reference if the specialized plans for the same building or facility were realized in several stages, i.e., as part of several contracts. The same reference can be presented to prove several minimum requirements, provided it meets the prescribed minimum suitability requirement.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have references for general design work (preparation of design documentation covering at least architectural, structural, building mechanical, building electrical, transport, and utility branches) for a public building with a net floor area of at least 10,000 m2, completed within 6 years (72 months) preceding the publication of the invitation to participate.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must describe their most significant completed services from the 6 years (72 months) preceding the publication of the invitation to participate, according to Section 21 (3) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.) – considering Section 21 (3a) b) – with at least the following content: - time of completion (start and end dates of completion, with year/month/day accuracy), - name, address of the other contracting party, name, contact details (phone and/or email address) of the person providing the information/reference, - detailed description of the subject of the service, allowing the assessment of compliance with the suitability requirement, - quantity of completion (m2), - proportion of own completion (%), (if applicable, in case of completion as a joint tenderer), - declaration whether the completion was in accordance with the specifications and the contract. If the completion was not in accordance with the contract, the reason and extent of the deviation, as well as the fact of the economic operator's breach of contract, if any, must be described in the certificate or declaration. If the proof of suitability is made by a declaration of the tenderer, the applicant, or another organization participating in the proof of suitability, the declaration must also state whether the other contracting party disputes the contractual nature of the completion or – if the economic operator has declared this – the circumstance that the economic operator is not liable for the breach of contract. The date of completion must fall within the examined period. The contracting authority stipulates, based on Section 21 (3a) b) of the Government Decree, that services completed within the examined period, but started no more than 9 years ago, may be taken into account for the proof of reference. Attention is drawn to the application of Section 21/A, Section 22 (1)-(2)-(4), Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree; Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12), Section 67 (3), Section 69 (11)-(11a) and Section 140 (9) of the Public Procurement Act. Joint tenderers (joint applicants) may meet the prescribed suitability requirements according to Section 65 (6) of the Public Procurement Act. The tenderer (applicant) may also meet the prescribed suitability requirement by relying on the capacity of any other organization (person) in accordance with Section 65 (7) of the Public Procurement Act. The entity providing its capacities must prove compliance with the given suitability condition in the same way as the prescribed methods of proof, and must also declare that the resources necessary for the performance of the contract will be available during the term of the contract. Compliance with one requirement can be proven with a maximum of 2 references in cases M.1.1-M.1.2, and a maximum of 1 reference in cases M.1.3-M.1.4. The contracting authority considers it one reference if the specialized plans for the same building or facility were realized in several stages, i.e., as part of several contracts. The same reference can be presented to prove several minimum requirements, provided it meets the prescribed minimum suitability requirement.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have references for general design work (preparation of design documentation covering at least architectural, structural, building mechanical, building electrical, transport, and utility branches) for a passenger facility with a net floor area of at least 10,000 m2, completed within 6 years (72 months) preceding the publication of the invitation to participate.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must describe their most significant completed services from the 6 years (72 months) preceding the publication of the invitation to participate, according to Section 21 (3) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.) – considering Section 21 (3a) b) – with at least the following content: - time of completion (start and end dates of completion, with year/month/day accuracy), - name, address of the other contracting party, name, contact details (phone and/or email address) of the person providing the information/reference, - detailed description of the subject of the service, allowing the assessment of compliance with the suitability requirement, - quantity of completion (m2), - proportion of own completion (%), (if applicable, in case of completion as a joint tenderer), - declaration whether the completion was in accordance with the specifications and the contract. If the completion was not in accordance with the contract, the reason and extent of the deviation, as well as the fact of the economic operator's breach of contract, if any, must be described in the certificate or declaration. If the proof of suitability is made by a declaration of the tenderer, the applicant, or another organization participating in the proof of suitability, the declaration must also state whether the other contracting party disputes the contractual nature of the completion or – if the economic operator has declared this – the circumstance that the economic operator is not liable for the breach of contract. The date of completion must fall within the examined period. The contracting authority stipulates, based on Section 21 (3a) b) of the Government Decree, that services completed within the examined period, but started no more than 9 years ago, may be taken into account for the proof of reference. Attention is drawn to the application of Section 21/A, Section 22 (1)-(2)-(4), Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree; Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12), Section 67 (3), Section 69 (11)-(11a) and Section 140 (9) of the Public Procurement Act. Joint tenderers (joint applicants) may meet the prescribed suitability requirements according to Section 65 (6) of the Public Procurement Act. The tenderer (applicant) may also meet the prescribed suitability requirement by relying on the capacity of any other organization (person) in accordance with Section 65 (7) of the Public Procurement Act. The entity providing its capacities must prove compliance with the given suitability condition in the same way as the prescribed methods of proof, and must also declare that the resources necessary for the performance of the contract will be available during the term of the contract. Compliance with one requirement can be proven with a maximum of 2 references in cases M.1.1-M.1.2, and a maximum of 1 reference in cases M.1.3-M.1.4. The contracting authority considers it one reference if the specialized plans for the same building or facility were realized in several stages, i.e., as part of several contracts. The same reference can be presented to prove several minimum requirements, provided it meets the prescribed minimum suitability requirement.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have references for general design work (preparation of design documentation covering at least architectural, structural, building mechanical, building electrical, transport, and utility branches) for a building with a net floor area of at least 2,500 m2, which achieved the highest or immediately following certification level of any certified building rating system (e.g., BREEAM/LEED/DGNB), completed within 6 years (72 months) preceding the publication of the invitation to participate.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must describe their most significant completed services from the 6 years (72 months) preceding the publication of the invitation to participate, according to Section 21 (3) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.) – considering Section 21 (3a) b) – with at least the following content: - time of completion (start and end dates of completion, with year/month/day accuracy), - name, address of the other contracting party, name, contact details (phone and/or email address) of the person providing the information/reference, - detailed description of the subject of the service, allowing the assessment of compliance with the suitability requirement, - quantity of completion (m2), - proportion of own completion (%), (if applicable, in case of completion as a joint tenderer), - declaration whether the completion was in accordance with the specifications and the contract. If the completion was not in accordance with the contract, the reason and extent of the deviation, as well as the fact of the economic operator's breach of contract, if any, must be described in the certificate or declaration. If the proof of suitability is made by a declaration of the tenderer, the applicant, or another organization participating in the proof of suitability, the declaration must also state whether the other contracting party disputes the contractual nature of the completion or – if the economic operator has declared this – the circumstance that the economic operator is not liable for the breach of contract. The date of completion must fall within the examined period. The contracting authority stipulates, based on Section 21 (3a) b) of the Government Decree, that services completed within the examined period, but started no more than 9 years ago, may be taken into account for the proof of reference. Attention is drawn to the application of Section 21/A, Section 22 (1)-(2)-(4), Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree; Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12), Section 67 (3), Section 69 (11)-(11a) and Section 140 (9) of the Public Procurement Act. Joint tenderers (joint applicants) may meet the prescribed suitability requirements according to Section 65 (6) of the Public Procurement Act. The tenderer (applicant) may also meet the prescribed suitability requirement by relying on the capacity of any other organization (person) in accordance with Section 65 (7) of the Public Procurement Act. The entity providing its capacities must prove compliance with the given suitability condition in the same way as the prescribed methods of proof, and must also declare that the resources necessary for the performance of the contract will be available during the term of the contract. Compliance with one requirement can be proven with a maximum of 2 references in cases M.1.1-M.1.2, and a maximum of 1 reference in cases M.1.3-M.1.4. The contracting authority considers it one reference if the specialized plans for the same building or facility were realized in several stages, i.e., as part of several contracts. The same reference can be presented to prove several minimum requirements, provided it meets the prescribed minimum suitability requirement.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have at least 1 architectural designer with an "É" (or equivalent) qualification according to Government Decree 266/2013 (VII. 11.), or with the education and professional experience required to obtain the qualification, and at least 36 months of additional professional experience in design relevant to their field.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must submit all documents prescribed in point M.2 in the bid, as the contracting authority will consider the additional experience of the expert specified for this suitability requirement during the evaluation. Documents to be attached (for all experts): a) expert's handwritten signed CV proving the required professional practice and experience (the CV must contain data relevant to assessing the expert's practice, including a description of investments, projects, the tasks and activities performed by the expert, the start and end dates of the activity /at least year, month accuracy, and (if applicable) the chamber registration number for the given qualification and the earliest/initial date of obtaining the qualification (year-month-day accuracy). The CV must include the name of the organization with which the expert is employed or has another legal relationship aimed at employment at the time of the declaration.); b) expert's handwritten signed declaration of availability stating that they will be available during the term of the contract; c) if the expert does not have the relevant qualification: a simple copy of the document proving the education or professional qualification. Proving the equivalence of the education or professional qualification is the obligation and responsibility of the tenderer (applicant). In relation to the experts presented for the proof of suitability according to point M2), parallel periods of practice are counted only once in the expert's practice for the purpose of suitability and evaluation. The contracting authority considers parallel months only once, so a maximum of 12 months can be awarded per year for the expert. The tenderer must also declare the experts to be involved in the performance on an electronic form in the EKR, specifying the expert to be involved (expert's name), the relevant point of the suitability requirement, and the expert's employer, or the person/organization with whom/which the expert has another legal relationship aimed at employment. The contracting authority draws attention to the application of Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree, Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12) and Section 67 (3) of the Public Procurement Act. The condition for concluding the contract is that the experts possess the prescribed (or equivalent) qualification - this must be declared in the application for participation.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have at least 1 structural designer with a "G" (or equivalent) qualification according to Government Decree 266/2013 (VII. 11.), or with the education and professional experience required to obtain the qualification, and at least 36 months of additional professional experience in design relevant to their field.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must submit all documents prescribed in point M.2 in the bid, as the contracting authority will consider the additional experience of the expert specified for this suitability requirement during the evaluation. Documents to be attached (for all experts): a) expert's handwritten signed CV proving the required professional practice and experience (the CV must contain data relevant to assessing the expert's practice, including a description of investments, projects, the tasks and activities performed by the expert, the start and end dates of the activity /at least year, month accuracy, and (if applicable) the chamber registration number for the given qualification and the earliest/initial date of obtaining the qualification (year-month-day accuracy). The CV must include the name of the organization with which the expert is employed or has another legal relationship aimed at employment at the time of the declaration.); b) expert's handwritten signed declaration of availability stating that they will be available during the term of the contract; c) if the expert does not have the relevant qualification: a simple copy of the document proving the education or professional qualification. Proving the equivalence of the education or professional qualification is the obligation and responsibility of the tenderer (applicant). In relation to the experts presented for the proof of suitability according to point M2), parallel periods of practice are counted only once in the expert's practice for the purpose of suitability and evaluation. The contracting authority considers parallel months only once, so a maximum of 12 months can be awarded per year for the expert. The tenderer must also declare the experts to be involved in the performance on an electronic form in the EKR, specifying the expert to be involved (expert's name), the relevant point of the suitability requirement, and the expert's employer, or the person/organization with whom/which the expert has another legal relationship aimed at employment. The contracting authority draws attention to the application of Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree, Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12) and Section 67 (3) of the Public Procurement Act. The condition for concluding the contract is that the experts possess the prescribed (or equivalent) qualification - this must be declared in the application for participation.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have at least 1 building mechanical designer with a "V" (or equivalent) qualification according to Government Decree 266/2013 (VII. 11.), or with the education and professional experience required to obtain the qualification, and at least 36 months of additional professional experience in design relevant to their field.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must submit all documents prescribed in point M.2 in the bid, as the contracting authority will consider the additional experience of the expert specified for this suitability requirement during the evaluation. Documents to be attached (for all experts): a) expert's handwritten signed CV proving the required professional practice and experience (the CV must contain data relevant to assessing the expert's practice, including a description of investments, projects, the tasks and activities performed by the expert, the start and end dates of the activity /at least year, month accuracy, and (if applicable) the chamber registration number for the given qualification and the earliest/initial date of obtaining the qualification (year-month-day accuracy). The CV must include the name of the organization with which the expert is employed or has another legal relationship aimed at employment at the time of the declaration.); b) expert's handwritten signed declaration of availability stating that they will be available during the term of the contract; c) if the expert does not have the relevant qualification: a simple copy of the document proving the education or professional qualification. Proving the equivalence of the education or professional qualification is the obligation and responsibility of the tenderer (applicant). In relation to the experts presented for the proof of suitability according to point M2), parallel periods of practice are counted only once in the expert's practice for the purpose of suitability and evaluation. The contracting authority considers parallel months only once, so a maximum of 12 months can be awarded per year for the expert. The tenderer must also declare the experts to be involved in the performance on an electronic form in the EKR, specifying the expert to be involved (expert's name), the relevant point of the suitability requirement, and the expert's employer, or the person/organization with whom/which the expert has another legal relationship aimed at employment. The contracting authority draws attention to the application of Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree, Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12) and Section 67 (3) of the Public Procurement Act. The condition for concluding the contract is that the experts possess the prescribed (or equivalent) qualification - this must be declared in the application for participation.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have at least 1 building electrical designer with a "T" (or equivalent) qualification according to Government Decree 266/2013 (VII. 11.), or with the education and professional experience required to obtain the qualification, and at least 36 months of additional professional experience in design relevant to their field after obtaining the qualification.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must submit all documents prescribed in point M.2 in the bid, as the contracting authority will consider the additional experience of the expert specified for this suitability requirement during the evaluation. Documents to be attached (for all experts): a) expert's handwritten signed CV proving the required professional practice and experience (the CV must contain data relevant to assessing the expert's practice, including a description of investments, projects, the tasks and activities performed by the expert, the start and end dates of the activity /at least year, month accuracy, and (if applicable) the chamber registration number for the given qualification and the earliest/initial date of obtaining the qualification (year-month-day accuracy). The CV must include the name of the organization with which the expert is employed or has another legal relationship aimed at employment at the time of the declaration.); b) expert's handwritten signed declaration of availability stating that they will be available during the term of the contract; c) if the expert does not have the relevant qualification: a simple copy of the document proving the education or professional qualification. Proving the equivalence of the education or professional qualification is the obligation and responsibility of the tenderer (applicant). In relation to the experts presented for the proof of suitability according to point M2), parallel periods of practice are counted only once in the expert's practice for the purpose of suitability and evaluation. The contracting authority considers parallel months only once, so a maximum of 12 months can be awarded per year for the expert. The tenderer must also declare the experts to be involved in the performance on an electronic form in the EKR, specifying the expert to be involved (expert's name), the relevant point of the suitability requirement, and the expert's employer, or the person/organization with whom/which the expert has another legal relationship aimed at employment. The contracting authority draws attention to the application of Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree, Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12) and Section 67 (3) of the Public Procurement Act. The condition for concluding the contract is that the experts possess the prescribed (or equivalent) qualification - this must be declared in the application for participation.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

  • Description

    The tenderer is unsuitable if they do not have at least 1 BIM manager with at least 12 months of experience where specified geometric, alphanumeric, and metadata information requirements for the building information model (BIM) were applied during the preparation and/or implementation of the investment. The same expert can be nominated for a maximum of two positions.

    Documentation Requirement

    The tenderer must initially prove compliance with the suitability requirement(s) by submitting the ESPD. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration from the economic operator concerned: Section IV alpha of the ESPD must be completed, but not the other sections. The declaration according to the ESPD is made by the economic operator submitting the application on behalf of the joint applicants. If the number of economic operators to be invited to bid (5) is exceeded, the contracting authority will request detailed proof of the suitability requirement from all applicants during the evaluation of the applications. The tenderer must describe the names of the experts (organizations) they intend to involve in the performance, along with their qualifications and professional experience, and declare the position for which the named expert (organization) will be used. Documents to be attached (for all experts): a) expert's handwritten signed CV proving the required professional practice and experience (the CV must contain data relevant to assessing the expert's practice, including a description of investments, projects, the tasks and activities performed by the expert, the start and end dates of the activity /at least year, month accuracy, and (if applicable) the chamber registration number for the given qualification and the earliest/initial date of obtaining the qualification (year-month-day accuracy). The CV must include the name of the organization with which the expert is employed or has another legal relationship aimed at employment at the time of the declaration.); b) expert's handwritten signed declaration of availability stating that they will be available during the term of the contract; c) if the expert does not have the relevant qualification: a simple copy of the document proving the education or professional qualification. Proving the equivalence of the education or professional qualification is the obligation and responsibility of the tenderer (applicant). In relation to the experts presented for the proof of suitability according to point M2), parallel periods of practice are counted only once in the expert's practice for the purpose of suitability and evaluation. The contracting authority considers parallel months only once, so a maximum of 12 months can be awarded per year for the expert. The tenderer must also declare the experts to be involved in the performance on an electronic form in the EKR, specifying the expert to be involved (expert's name), the relevant point of the suitability requirement, and the expert's employer, or the person/organization with whom/which the expert has another legal relationship aimed at employment. The contracting authority draws attention to the application of Section 24 (1) of the Government Decree, Section 65 (6)-(7), (9), (11)-(12) and Section 67 (3) of the Public Procurement Act. The condition for concluding the contract is that the experts possess the prescribed (or equivalent) qualification - this must be declared in the application for participation.

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.

Award Criteria

  • Description

    Beruházás során megvalósít építménytípusok tekintet, azok AK által meghatározott építési beruházási értékét (Dr) figyelembe véve megajánlott díjarányok (Tr) - mint az Alapszolgáltatások tekintet képzett ajánlati ár számít alapját képező értékek - összeg

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

  • Description

    Szakmai ajánlat (BIM, Fenntarthatóság) a közbeszerzési dokumentumokban részletezettek szerint

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

  • Description

    M.2.1. szakember az előírt jogosultság vagy az ahhoz szükséges képzettség és szakmai tapasztalat megszerzését követő többlettapasztalatának darabszáma nemzetközi kereskedelmi repülőtér területén megvalósuló utasterminál épületének szakterületének megfelelő tervezésében (min 0, legkedvezőbb szint 3 db)

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

  • Description

    M.2.2. szakember az előírt jogosultság vagy az ahhoz szükséges képzettség és szakmai tapasztalat megszerzését követő többlettapasztalatának darabszáma nemzetközi kereskedelmi repülőtér területén megvalósuló utasterminál épületének szakterületének megfelelő tervezésében (min 0, legkedvezőbb szint 3 db)

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

  • Description

    Zöldminősítési, minősítő szakértői jogosultságú (BREEAM, és/vagy LEED, és/vagy DGNB feljogosító, az adott minősítő rendszer tekintetében akkreditációval rendelkező) szakember bevonása, aki az akkreditáció megszerzését követően legalább 36 hónap közhasználatú épület tervezési munkafolyamataiban szerzett szakmai tapasztalattal rendelkezik (igen/nem)

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

  • Description

    M.2.3. szakember az előírt jogosultság vagy az ahhoz szükséges képzettség és szakmai tapasztalat megszerzését követő többlettapasztalatának darabszáma nemzetközi kereskedelmi repülőtér területén megvalósuló utasterminál épületének szakterületének megfelelő tervezésében (min 0, legkedvezőbb szint 3 db)

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

  • Description

    M.2.4. szakember az előírt jogosultság vagy az ahhoz szükséges képzettség és szakmai tapasztalat megszerzését követő többlettapasztalatának darabszáma nemzetközi kereskedelmi repülőtér területén megvalósuló utasterminál épületének szakterületének megfelelő tervezésében (min 0, legkedvezőbb szint 3 db)

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

  • Description

    Különszolgáltatások esetében, Ajánlatkérő által meghatározott mérnökkategóriákra alkalmazott Keretmegállapodás Szerinti Tervezői Napidíjak összege (nettó EUR/mérnöknap)

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Previous winners

  • Who are you up against?

    The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Budapest Airport Budapest Liszt Ferenc Nemzetközi Repülőtér Üzemeltető Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság

From the notice

  • Tervezési Keretmegállapodás a Liszt Ferenc repülőtér hosszú távú repülőtér fejlesztési programjának tervezési feladataira vonatkozóan Jelen eljárás a Kbt. 105. § (2) bekezdés c) pontja szerinti több ajánlattevővel megkötendő keretmegállapodás megkötésére irányul. A megrendelésekre a verseny újranyitásával kerül sor a keretmegállapodásban meghatározott feltételek szerint. Beszerzési kötelezettség csak a keretmegállapodás alapján történő verseny újranyitás során jelenik meg, illetve a ténylegesen megrendelésre kerülő feladatokat a verseny újranyitások ajánlattételi felhívása (és a kapcsolódó közbeszerzési dokumentumok) tartalmazzák. A verseny újranyitások során ajánlattevőt ajánlattételi és – nyertessége esetén – szerződéskötési kötelezettség terheli, továbbá ajánlattevő csak a keretmegállapodásban foglaltakkal azonos vagy annál az ajánlatkérő számára kedvezőbb ajánlatot tehet majd! Ajánlatkérő felhívja a figyelmet arra, hogy verseny újranyitása esetén a Kbt. 105. § (4) bekezdésének alkalmazására kerül sor, keretmegállapodás megkötésére irányuló közbeszerzési eljárásban alkalmazott értékelési szempontoktól eltérő értékelési szempontokat kíván alkalmazni az egyes verseny újranyitások során az alábbiak szerint: 1. Az Egyedi Szerződés tárgyát képező Projektelemre vonatkozó (a Projektelem építménytípusának és beruházási értékének ismeretében megajánlott) Verseny Újranyitás Során Megajánlott Díjszázalék (Tre)) (%) - súlyszám: 45/50 (amennyiben nincs különszolgáltatás, úgy 50) (fordított arányosítás) 2. Különszolgáltatások esetében, Ajánlatkérő által meghatározott mérnökkategóriákra alkalmazott Egyedi Szerződés Szerinti Tervezői Napidíjak a mérnökkategóriánként szükséges mérnöknapok számának szorzatának összege Különszolgáltatás megrendelése esetén Különszolgáltatásonként értékelve azzal, hogy a súlyszám összességében változatlan, a Különszolgáltatásonkénti belső arányt Ajánlatkérő határozza meg a Különszolgáltatás jelentősége alapján - súlyszám: 5 (fordított arányosítás) 3. Szakmai ajánlat: Megvalósítási és teljesítési munkaterv bemutatása - súlyszám: 25 (logikai (igen, nem) és utána pontozás majd egyenes arányosítás) 4. Az adott verseny újranyitás kapcsán releváns további szakági tervezők és/vagy szakemberek tapasztalata hónapokban (minimum 0, legkedvezőbb szint 36 hónap) - súlyszám: 25 (egyenes arányosítás) A verseny újranyitások során a 3. számú értékelési részszempont Megvalósítási és teljesítési munkaterv bemutatása keretében Ajánlatkérő elvárja az Egyedi Szerződés keretében elvégzendő tervezési szolgáltatások teljesítésére kijelölt projektszervezet szereplőinek ismertetését, a szereplők feladatait, hatáskörét, felelősségét, valamint a köztük lévő hierarchikus és funkcionális kapcsolatok részletes leírását a Verseny Újranyitás ajánlattételi felhívása, Műszaki Leírása és a Keretmegállapodás és mellékletei, valamint az Egyedi Szerződés tervezetének elvárásai szerint. A szakmai ajánlat mellékleteként kötelezően csatolni kell az erőforrástervet is, amelynek tartalmaznia kell Alapszolgáltatásonként az egyes Verseny újranyitások közbeszerzési dokumentumaiban meghatározott szakembereket (szakembertípusonként azok számát), tevékenységét, ráfordításigényét havonkénti bontásban. Az egyes verseny újranyitások során alkalmazandó értékelési szempontrendszer részletes leírását a verseny újranyitások ajánlattételi felhívása és kapcsolódó további közbeszerzési dokumentumai fogják tartalmazni.

  • Contact

    Kocsis Istvánistvan.kocsis@bud.hu
  • Type
    Competition · Framework agreement · Prequalification
  • Location
    Pest
  • Main code
    Architectural design services
    71220000

Similar active competitions

  • BKM Budapesti Közművek Nonprofit Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság

    Prosjekteringstjenester

    K26104-Eseti jellegű munkákhoz tervezői feladatok

    A BKM Budapesti Közművek Nonprofit Zrt. 2 éves tervezői keretszerződést kíván kötni a Budapesten található telephelyein felmerülő építési, szakipari, épületgépészeti és épületvillamossági kivitelezési, átalakítási, korszerűsítési és felújítási munkák tervezésére, valamint az ezekhez kapcsolódó szakértői támogatásra; a szerződés értéke nem szerepel a tájékoztatóban. Az ajánlatok értékelésében az ár 50 pontot, az építész tervező többlettapasztalata 24, a gépész tervezőé 13, az elektromos tervezőé pedig 13 pontot ér. A részvételhez legalább egy-egy 5 millió forint értékű építészeti, 3 millió forint értékű épületgépészeti és 3 millió forint értékű elektromos tervezési referencia szükséges, továbbá É, G, V és HT jogosultságú (vagy azok megszerzéséhez szükséges végzettséggel és gyakorlattal rendelkező) szakembereket kell biztosítani; ugyanaz a szakember több szakterület követelményének is megfelelhet. A szolgáltatónak a tervezői vagy mérnöki szolgáltatás szerinti szakmai kamarai nyilvántartásban is szerepelnie kell.

    Competition
    Dec 9, 2026(24 days)

  • Nemzeti Sportügynökség Nonprofit Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság

    Arkitekttjenester

    Gerevich tervezés

    A Nemzeti Sportügynökség Nonprofit Zrt. tervezési szolgáltatást keres a budapesti Gerevich Aladár Nemzeti Vívócsarnok engedélyezési és kiviteli terveinek elkészítésére, valamint az építési engedély beszerzésére; a szerződés időtartama 400 nap. A feladat része a meglévő, 868,89 m²-es nagy fesztávú csarnok tartószerkezetének állapot- és teherbírás-vizsgálata, a szükséges szerkezeti beavatkozások tervezése, továbbá egy 400 fős sport- és rendezvénytér, valamint egy konferenciafunkciójú épületrész kialakításának tervezése. Az alkalmassághoz az ajánlattevőnek az elmúlt hat évben megkezdett és az elmúlt három évben teljesített referenciákat kell bemutatnia többek között legalább 6 000 m²-es multifunkcionális sportlétesítmény korszerűsítéséről, védett épület felújításáról, legalább 400 m²-es nagy fesztávú térről, valamint kiállítóteret és konferenciatermet magában foglaló tervezésről. Szükséges legalább egy, legalább 36 hónap közhasználatú építmények tervezésében jártas É jogosultságú vezető tervező, továbbá G, V és T szakterületi jogosultságú tervezők; a vezető tervezői feladatot az ajánlattevőnek kell ellátnia, alvállalkozó bevonása nélkül. Az elmúlt három lezárt üzleti év építészeti és mérnöki tervezési szolgáltatásaiból származó nettó árbevételnek összesen legalább 350 millió forintnak kell lennie, és szakmai kamarai nyilvántartásban való szereplés szükséges. Az értékelésben a nettó tervezési díj 50 pontot, a szakemberek meghatározott tapasztalata összesen 50 pontot ér.

    Competition
    Dec 11, 2026(26 days)

  • Budapest Airport Budapest Liszt Ferenc Nemzetközi Repülőtér Üzemeltető Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság

    Elektrisk infrastruktur og veibelysning

    AIR-PRON: BUD állóhelyek infrastruktúra fejlesztés

    A Budapest Airport Budapest Liszt Ferenc Nemzetközi Repülőtér Üzemeltető Zrt. a budapesti Liszt Ferenc repülőtér Pest vármegyei területén, 420 napos teljesítési idővel három részből álló infrastruktúra-fejlesztést tervez: a meglévő áramellátási infrastruktúra korszerűsítését; az utashidak PCA-előkezeltlevegő-rendszereinek és a távoli állóhelyek GPU-földiáramforrás-rendszereinek tervezését, szállítását és telepítését; valamint négy darab, egyenként 100 kW-os e-töltő tervezését, szállítását és telepítését a Cargo Apron PH2 területén. A közbeszerzés értéke nincs feltüntetve. A részvételhez megfelelő tervezői és mérnöki kamarai jogosultság vagy azzal egyenértékű külföldi nyilvántartás szükséges; az építési munkákhoz előírt referenciák között szerepel középfeszültségű hálózat és transzformátorállomás, irányított fúrás, földkábelezés, valamint legalább 400 m² kültéri bazaltbeton burkolat kivitelezése. A PCA- és GPU-rendszerek szállítására legalább öt-öt berendezés tervezését, szállítását és telepítését igazoló nemzetközi repülőtéri referencia szükséges, továbbá legalább két, megfelelő jogosultságú vagy egyenértékű képesítésű tervező és felelős műszaki vezető bevonása. Az ajánlatokat részenként ár és minőségi szempontok alapján értékelik; többek között a többlet-jótállást, a szakemberek nemzetközi repülőtereken szerzett többlettapasztalatát, a PCA műszaki paramétereit, a magyarországi szervizhátteret és a javítási munkák megkezdésének vállalt határidejét pontozzák.

    Competition
    Dec 15, 2026(30 days)