The Stockholm Environment Institute calls for tenders regarding the procurement of the Facility Manager for the Regional Adaptation Investment Facility (RAIF) under the ICCAP Project.
Awarded
The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.
- Deadline
- Mar 2,Expired
- Award
- IFC Performance Standards Compliance 18% and 7 more
Brief
The Stockholm Environment Institute har inngått en avtale med Avanzi Spa SB om å levere tjenester som Facility Manager for Regional Adaptation Investment Facility (RAIF) under ICCAP-prosjektet, med en varighet på 44 måneder og en total verdi på 796 400 euro. Det ble lagt vekt på erfaring med å forvalte lignende finansieringsfasiliteter, evne til å katalysere offentlig og privat kapital (med et krav om å ha katalysert minst 50 millioner euro), erfaring med ulike instrumenttyper (minst to typer de-risking verktøy), en klar katalyseringsplan, en investor-engasjementsplan, omfattende risikostyring, investorrelasjoner (minst 3 investor/donor-forhold), overholdelse av IFC Performance Standards, og prosjekter med ESG/GESI-sikkerhetstiltak (minst 50% av prosjektene). Det deltok 1 leverandør i konkurransen.
Miljøovervåking og naturvitenskapelige tjenester
Result
- Zakład Systemów Komputerowych ZSK sp. z o.oWinner
- 1Number of bids
- €796,400Contract value
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Award Criteria
Description
points: ≥90% of projects have externally or internally verified ESG/GESI safeguards, with documented evidence (e.g., safeguards reports, audit findings, or donor reviews), demonstrating exceptional consistency and rigor. • 2 points: ≥75% of projects have verified safeguards (internal/external), with clear documentation of safeguards systems and compliance, showing strong performance. • 1 point: ≥60% of projects have documented safeguard systems or policies in place, with evidence of systematic application and monitoring. • 0 points: ≥50% of projects have basic safeguard procedures in place, meeting minimum systematic integration requirements.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
3 points: Certified under IFC Performance Standards, with certification year provided and evidence of ongoing compliance monitoring, representing gold standard implementation. • 2 points: Documented internal alignment with IFC PS, with partial application demonstrated through safeguards policies, training programs, or external reviews, showing robust implementation. • 1 point: Policies and procedures aligned with IFC PS and systematically applied in operations, with evidence of integration into decision-making and monitoring processes, meeting strong alignment standards. • 0 points: Basic alignment with IFC PS demonstrated through organisational policies or procedures, with some evidence of application in projects, meeting minimum alignment requirements.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
3 points: ≥10 institutional investors engaged in co-financing or collaboration, with documented evidence (e.g., co-investment agreements, letters of support, or joint project references). • 2 points: ≥5 investor relationships with documented collaboration on relevant projects or facilities. • 1 point: ≥3 investor/donor relationships noted, with some evidence of engagement or collaboration. • 0 points: ≥1 investor/donor relationship mentioned, or relationships in development.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
points: Risk systems comprehensively cover all 7 categories as per Annex 1(Assignment Description), with documented frameworks, implementation evidence, and examples of risk mitigation in comparable projects, demonstrating exceptional comprehensiveness. • 2 points: Risk systems cover ≥5 categories, with clear evidence of implementation and monitoring in previous facilities or projects, showing strong capability. • 1 point: Risk systems cover ≥4 categories, with documented frameworks and some evidence of implementation. • 0 points: Risk systems cover ≥3 categories with documented policies and procedures, meeting minimum framework requirements.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
points: Comprehensive strategy targeting ≥10 private and ≥6 public institutional investors, with clear tools, sequencing, and timelines. Includes investor-specific value propositions and engagement tactics. • 2 points: Strong plan targeting ≥6 private and ≥3 public investors, with an indicative roadmap and engagement tools specified. • 1 point: Generic plan with named investors, but lacking a detailed timeline, tools, or sequencing. • 0 points: Minimal plan; no specific investor targeting tools or timeline provided.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
3 points: Clear monthly/quarterly targets toward EUR 250 million, with quantified milestones for each instrument type, country, and investor segment. Includes contingency planning and assumptions. • 2 points: Quarterly benchmarks toward the target, with milestones included and reasonable sequencing of capital mobilisation activities. • 1 point: Annual targets stated, but weak quantification or limited detail on sequencing and milestones. 0 points: No clear targets or quantifiable roadmap; generic statements without measurable objectives.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
3 points: Deployed ≥4 types of instruments (e.g., first-loss capital, guarantees, FX hedging, green bonds) across multiple projects or facilities, with documented outcomes, demonstrating exceptional diversity and sophistication. • 2 points: Deployed ≥3 types of de-risking tools, with evidence of successful implementation and impact, showing strong capability. • 1 point: Deployed ≥2 types of de-risking tools (including at least one of: first-loss, guarantees, or similar risk-sharing mechanism), with documented application in relevant contexts. • 0 points: Deployed at least one first-loss or guarantee mechanism with documented application, meeting minimum instrument structuring requirements. • In order for SEI to make a correct assessment of Criterion 3, the tenderer shall
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
3 points: Catalysed ≥EUR 200 million across climate-focused or comparable instruments, with documented evidence (e.g., signed co-financing agreements, investor commitments, or audited reports). • 2 points: Catalysed ≥EUR 100 million, with verifiable documentation demonstrating public and/or private capital mobilisation. • 1 point: Catalysed ≥EUR 50 million, with supporting documentation (e.g., investor letters, project financing close reports, or annual reports). • 0 points: Catalysed less than EUR 20 million, or limited documentation provided.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
3 points: Experience managing ≥3 blended finance facilities of comparable scope to RAIF (e.g., facilities involving multiple countries, diverse financial instruments, public-private collaboration, and climate or adaptation focus), demonstrating exceptional breadth and depth. • 2 points: Experience managing ≥2 relevant facilities with demonstrated complexity (e.g., multi-instrument structures, regional reach, or catalytic finance objectives), showing strong capability. • 1 point: Experience managing 1 blended finance facility with clear relevance to the RAIF mandate (e.g., climate finance, risk-sharing, or SME/MSME support in emerging markets), meeting core requirements. • 0 points: Experience managing 1 facility that partially meets RAIF requirements (e.g., smaller scale, single-country, or limited instrument diversity) but demonstrates fundamental facility management capability.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Stift The Stockholm Environment Institute Sei
From the notice
The purpose of this procurement is to appoint a qualified and experienced organisation to serve as the Facility Manager for the Regional Adaptation Investment Facility (RAIF) under the ICCAP project.
Contact
Vildan Kukuljacvildan.kukuljac@sei.org- ResultType
- 90700000Main codeEnvironmental services