25/14408 - Purchase 2026 for 145/170 kV AC Cables
Published deadline passed
The published deadline has passed. For multi-stage competitions a later tender deadline may still apply — check the notice or portal for the current phase.
- Qualification deadline
- May 22,Expired
- Award
- Technical/Project Execution/Case Study 8% and 2 more
Brief
Energinet Eltransmission A/S needs complete and fully functional supplies of several 145 and 170 kV AC cable systems, divided into four lots, over 5 years, with a maximum total value of 412.5 million EUR. The supplies are intended for multiple projects across Denmark, specifically the NEA project (approx. 820 km), the 3N project (approx. 585 km), various 145kV projects in Northwest Seeland (approx. 780 km), and various projects in Jutland (approx. 595 km). Suppliers must propose an example case solution as part of the technical description. Award criteria are Price (12.6761%), Technical/Project Execution/Case Study (8.4507%), Programme, organization and manpower (2.8169%), and Contract Terms (4.2254%). For qualification, applicants must meet minimum equity and equity ratio requirements for each lot they apply for. For Lot 1, equity must be at least 38.822.000 EUR and equity ratio at least 20%, or equity exceeding 116.466.000 EUR if the ratio is between 15% and 20%. For Lot 2, equity must be at least 26.780.000 EUR and equity ratio at least 20%, or equity exceeding 80.340.000 EUR if the ratio is between 15% and 20%. For Lot 3, equity must be at least 31.000.000 EUR and equity ratio at least 20%, or equity exceeding 93.000.000 EUR if the ratio is between 15% and 20%. For Lot 4, equity must be at least 26.105.000 EUR and equity ratio at least 20%, or equity exceeding 78.315.000 EUR if the ratio is between 15% and 20%.
Elektrisk utstyr og belysning
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Qualification requirements
Description
Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least EUR 38.822.000.
Documentation Requirement
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.). If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds EUR 116.466.000.
Documentation Requirement
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least EUR 26.780.000.
Documentation Requirement
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.). If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds EUR 80.340.000.
Documentation Requirement
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least EUR 31.000.000.
Documentation Requirement
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.). If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds EUR 93.000.000.
Documentation Requirement
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least EUR 26.105.000.
Documentation Requirement
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.). If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds EUR 78.315.000.
Documentation Requirement
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Award Criteria
Description
Prices must be stated in the attached Schedule of Prices - Purchase 2026 for 145&170 kV AC Cables doc. 25/14408-54 for each lot the tenderer submits a tender for, and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. The evaluation price of delivery in Schedule of Prices - Purchase 2026 for 145&170 kV AC Cables doc. 25/14408-54 must be based on the Unit Prices for delivery from the three transportation offers in the example case, documents 26/05333 (1-9). These prices will form the unit prices used for the evaluation in 25/14408 54 Schedules of Prices – Purchase 2026 for 145 & 170 kV AC Cables, Lots 1–4. For evaluation purposes: Lot 3 145kV shall use 170 kV, 1000 m drums as the reference transport price for both 1000 m and 1500 m lengths. Any 1200 mm² transport prices shall also be based on 170 kV, 1000 m drums. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Cost for each lot. The overall evaluation per lot will be based on the Total cost for evaluation per lot: Lot 1: Cell L11, Lot 2: Cell L11, Lot 3: Cell L11, Lot 4: Cell L11
Evaluation Method
The overall evaluation per lot will be based on the Total cost for evaluation per lot: Lot 1: Cell L11, Lot 2: Cell L11, Lot 3: Cell L11, Lot 4: Cell L11.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
For each lot the evaluation will be based on a description of the offered Technical Solution and the Project Execution along with the Case Study (as described in section 1.4). The following documents are expected to be general. The description should demonstrate the technical level of the solution, and include these elements: Qualification reports (PQ-test, Type Test etc.) from the facilities that are to be used for production. Filled out in Appendix 2E - EGS-0084 Handover Specification Cables - Purchase 2026 for 145&170 kV AC Cables, for proposed 1200 mm2 and 2500 mm2 cross-sections, for 145 and 170 kV. High voltage cables electrical design reports for proposed 1200 mm2 and 2500 mm2 cross-sections, for 145 and 170 kV. Supplier’s datasheets for all accessories (joints, terminations, link boxes, SVLs, bonding cables, ECC, cleats). Drum drawings. Transportation, lifting and storage instructions for cable drums and accessories. Storage manual for spare parts. Maintenance manual. The following documents should be considered for the Case Study only: Plan of Works (Should include a description of a workweek (cable pull, transporting of jointing container, preparation of cable, curing of resin, etc.)), Detailed time schedule for the works (production, testing, transport, installation), Project specific organization chart (during all of the different phases of the project), Components updated in table in doc. no. 26/05333-7. Cable pulling and accessories interface document, RAMS for work under induced voltage, ITPs relevant for the case, Sheath test procedure. Solutions for all three joint bay designs described in section 6.7 in ETS-0067. The solution of the Case Study should be based on following documents: Doc. no. 25/14408-56, 26/05333-1, 26/05333-2, 26/05333-3, 26/05333-4, 26/05333-6, 26/05333-7, 26/05333-8, 26/05333-9 in the Tender material. The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderers who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements will be of particular importance in the evaluation: General technical solution: 1) System design: The quality of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values, and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored. In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provides evidence of water-proof design of joints and link-boxes. 2) Minimum allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4) Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively. 5) Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively. 6) Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7) AC resistance: Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively. 8) Current rating: Both continuous and short-term rating will be evaluated. A higher current rating will be evaluated positively. 9) Storage instructions: Long shelf life and ease of storage of components will be evaluated positively. 10) Maintenance: Maintenance free systems will be evaluated positively. High maintenance systems will be evaluated negatively. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Case Study: When evaluating the “Case Study” it will be evaluated positively to what degree the tenderer shows a robust, realistic, and operational technical solution along with a realistic plan of works and time schedule. Furthermore, it is important and will be evaluated positively that there is a clear and easy path from the line diagram component types to the datasheet EGS-0084 and to the Supplier accessories datasheets. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion, with focus on installation, setup and testing. The quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation. It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site.
Evaluation Method
The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderers who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements will be of particular importance in the evaluation: General technical solution: 1) System design: The quality of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values, and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored. In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provides evidence of water-proof design of joints and link-boxes. 2) Minimum allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4) Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively. 5) Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively. 6) Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7) AC resistance: Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively. 8) Current rating: Both continuous and short-term rating will be evaluated. A higher current rating will be evaluated positively. 9) Storage instructions: Long shelf life and ease of storage of components will be evaluated positively. 10) Maintenance: Maintenance free systems will be evaluated positively. High maintenance systems will be evaluated negatively. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Case Study: When evaluating the “Case Study” it will be evaluated positively to what degree the tenderer shows a robust, realistic, and operational technical solution along with a realistic plan of works and time schedule. Furthermore, it is important and will be evaluated positively that there is a clear and easy path from the line diagram component types to the datasheet EGS-0084 and to the Supplier accessories datasheets. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion, with focus on installation, setup and testing. The quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation. It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the tenderer is allowed to propose deviations to the elements of the contract identified as competitive elements in the contract terms. The contract terms consist of: Contract Agreement, doc.no. 25/14408-17, Appendix 1 [General Terms and Conditions for Works], doc.no. 25/14408-18, Appendix 3 (Circuit Specific Order), doc. no. 25/14408-32, Appendix 4 [Time Schedule], doc.no. 25/14408-55. The deviations should be enclosed in the clarification list c.f. doc.no. 25/14408-14 and be included in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification”. The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. Contract terms listed in section 3.7.1 are mandatory parts and deviations to these are not accepted. The tendered contract must be performed based on the contract terms. The tenderer is allowed to propose explicit and well-explained deviations to the following listed competitive elements: In Contract Agreement Purchase 2026 for 145&170 kV AC Cables, doc.no. 25/14408-17: Sub-Clause 5.3 (Annual cost reduction), Clause 6 (Additional Provisions), limited to: Cancellation or postponement of production slot, Repair preparedness. In Appendix 3 (Circuit Specific Order), doc. no. 25/14408-32: Sub-Clause 15.1 (Maximum amount of liquidated damages) in Section 7 (Contract data). Sub-Clause 16.1 (Defects notification period) in Section 7 (Contract data). Sub-Clause 16.6 in Section 7 (Contract data) both in terms of ‘’Defects notification period for replaced and repaired parts’’ and ‘’Maximum defect notification period’’. Sub-Clause 17.2 (Limitation of liability) in Section 7 (Contract data). In Appendix 1 [General Terms and Conditions for Works], doc.no. 25/14408-18: Clause 10 (Time for Completion – except for sub-clause 10.1), Clause 11 (Taking Over), Clause 14 (Intellectual property rights), Clause 15 (Late-delivery and non-delivery), Clause 16 (Defects and remedies), Clause 17 (Limitation of liability), Clause 18 (Product liability towards Customer), Clause 20 (Indemnification), Clause 28 (Termination), Clause 29 (Termination for convenience). In Appendix 4 [Time Schedule], doc.no. 25/14408-55: The liquidated damages stated in ‘’Liquidated damages for late completion’’. Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of 10 will be awarded. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Evaluation Method
Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of 10 will be awarded. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
For each Lot the evaluation will be based on: Programme: For the evaluation of the “Lot Programme” the tenderer should include a detailed and robust programme which outlines how the activities will be planned from contract commencement date until taking-over certificates has been issued. Organization and manpower: Management, construction, and installation is of immense importance to execution of the project on site in Denmark. The tenderer should include a description which covers: The Gate System described in Scope of Works doc. no. 25/14408-41. Concerning the activities on site in Denmark the tenderer should include a detailed description of the manpower used on site for supervision and jointing work. The description should also cover: Organizational diagram for the overarching contract structure, Overall structure including roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation, Interfaces towards Energinet and other external parties e.g. the civil work contractor on site in Denmark including lines of communication. Reference is made to doc. no. 25/14408-55. The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned, realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: The description and the Lot Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded, programme for the critical activities including start-up of Overarching Contract and delivery of all general documentation, factory visits, kick-off meetings, etc. It should contain an Overarching contract organisation chart, with clear roles and responsibilities, along with contact information for each role. The description and programme contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site and the associated manpower. The description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation phases. The description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability to handle the constant flow of circuit specific orders under the Agreement and an understanding of the Gate System. The description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark, with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further, interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. The ability to extent personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all times. It will be evaluated positively that the Plan contains flexibility regarding installations date, but it will be evaluated negatively if the plan shows a significantly later installation date than the date in doc. no. 25/14408-55. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Evaluation Method
The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned, realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: The description and the Lot Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded, programme for the critical activities including start-up of Overarching Contract and delivery of all general documentation, factory visits, kick-off meetings, etc. It should contain an Overarching contract organisation chart, with clear roles and responsibilities, along with contact information for each role. The description and programme contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site and the associated manpower. The description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation phases. The description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability to handle the constant flow of circuit specific orders under the Agreement and an understanding of the Gate System. The description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark, with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further, interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. The ability to extent personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all times. It will be evaluated positively that the Plan contains flexibility regarding installations date, but it will be evaluated negatively if the plan shows a significantly later installation date than the date in doc. no. 25/14408-55. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Energinet Eltransmission A/S
From the notice
Through the establishment of four (4) Agreements (4 lots), the Contracting Authority intends to procure complete and fully functional supplies of several 145 and 170 kV AC cable systems, as further specified in Appendix 4, Time schedule - Purchase 2026 for 145&170 kV AC Cables (Doc. 25/14408-55). Each Agreement (lot) covers specified supplies intended for multiple projects. For each individual project, a specified contract will be made according to the Contract agreement. The scope for each of the four lots is described in detail in the tender documents. Further details concern-ing the procurement are provided in the appendices to the tender documents. Prequalification: It is possible to apply for prequalification for all four lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. If an applicant applies for more than one lot but does not have the capacity for all such lots, this must be clearly stated in the application. Case: As part of the technical description, the Supplier must submit a proposal for an example case solution. The example case solution must be based on the elements described therein as well as the case docu-ments 26/05333 (1-9). Award: The Agreements will be awarded per Lot directly to the tenderer who has submitted the most economically advantageous tender for each Contract, see section 4.1. A tenderer may be awarded one or more lots as described: The Contracts are divided into four (4) lots, with the expected scope and award conditions set out below: 1.Lot 1 (NEA project (app. 820 km)): Lot 1 will be awarded to the tenderer submitting the most economically advantageous tender based on the best price-quality ratio. The evaluation of Lot 1 will be conducted independently and will not be affected by tenders sub-mitted for other lots. Estimated value: EUR 122.100.000 inclusive option for 10% additional volume to cover unforeseen demand and/or changes in the project. 2.Lot 2 (3N project (app. 585 km)): Lot 2 will be awarded to the tenderer submitting the most economically advantageous tender based on the best price-quality ratio. All tenderers are eligible to submit bids for this lot. The evaluation of Lot 2 will be conducted independently and will not be affected by tenders sub-mitted for other lots. Estimated value: EUR 88,000,000, inclusive option for 10% additional volume to cover unforeseen demand and/or changes in the project. 3.Lot 3 (various 145kV projects Northwest Seeland (DK2) (app. 780 km)): Lot 3 will be awarded to the tenderer submitting the most economically advantageous tender based on the best price-quality ratio. However, the tender submitted by the winner of Lot 1 will be excluded from the evaluation of this lot. The evaluation of Lot 3 will be conducted independently and will not be affected by tenders sub-mitted for other lots. Estimated value: EUR 112.200.000 inclusive option for 10 % additional volume to cover unforeseen demand and/or changes in the project. 4.Lot 4 (various projects Jutland (DK1) (app. 595 km)): Lot 4 will be awarded to the tenderer submitting the most economically advantageous tender based on the best price-quality ratio. However, the tender submitted by the winner of Lot 2 will be excluded from the evaluation of this lot. The evaluation of Lot 1 will be conducted independently and will not be affected by tenders sub-mitted for other lots. Estimated value: EUR 90.200.000 inclusive option for 10% additional volume to cover unforeseen demand and/or changes in the project. Based on continuous improvements in fx. optimized manufacturing, project management, procurement etc. in the duration of the Agreement, Supplier shall implement an annual cost reduction of 2% on the baseline price list (doc. 25/14408-54) included in Supplier’s final tender (Appendix 5), excluding any agreed price regulation. The baseline price list shall be adjusted annually by applying the 2% reduction to the most recently updated baseline price list (see also Contract Agreement doc. 25/14408-17 Clause 5.3).Main features of the procedureThe tenders submitted must be valid for a period of 6 months from the specified time limit for the submis-sion of tenders. If the tenderer during the negotiation phase prepares and submits revised tenders, such tenders must also be valid for the period of 6 months from the specified time limit for these revised ten-ders. In the event the investment screening process described in section 1.7 exceeds the expiry date of the validity period the validity of the economically most advantageous tender is automatically extended until the finalization of the screening process added reasonable time for subsequent contract signing assuming the outcome of the investment screening is positive.
Contact
Indkøbsafdelingen - Aindkob@energinet.dk- Competition · PrequalificationType
- 31321300Main codeHigh-voltage cable