Evaluation of the African Guarantee Fund and Denmark’s contribution
Published deadline passed
The published deadline has passed. For multi-stage competitions a later tender deadline may still apply — check the notice or portal for the current phase.
- Qualification deadline
- Aug 10,Expired
- Award
- Price 10%
Brief
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères du Danemark needs evaluation services for the African Guarantee Fund and Denmark's contribution, with a maximum total value of 4,500,000 DKK. The evaluation aims to document and assess the AGF's contribution to improving access to finance for SMEs in Africa and associated development outcomes, as well as the contribution and added value of Danish support to the AGF. This includes mapping AGF's institutional model, assessing its relevance, coherence, success in mobilizing private capital, and financial sustainability, and generating quantitative evidence on the results of AGF-supported guarantees and capacity development in two country contexts. Tenders will be evaluated based on quality (90%) and price (10%). Suppliers must have an average yearly turnover of minimum 9,000,000 DKK for the last two financial years.
Bedriftsrådgivning
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Qualification requirements
Description
The economic operator is required to have an average yearly turnover of minimum DKK 9,000,000 for the last 2 financial years available (where the economic operator can present annual reports). When the economic operator is participating in the procurement procedure together with others (e.g a consortia or joint venture) or if the economic operator relies on the capacity of other entities, it is required that the participating economic operators or the economic operator and the entities referred to altogether meet the selection criteria. Each involved economic operator or entity must submit a completed ESPD and the participating economic operators or the entities referred to are subject to joint and several liability for the performance of the contract.
Documentation Requirement
The contracting authority can accept annual reports or excerpts hereof or relevant statements from a bank or certified accountant as documentation in relation to the economic and financial standing. When an economic operator is participating in the procurement procedure together with others or when an economic operator relies on the economic and financial standing of other entities, the economic operator must also provide statements of support or other documentation proving that the economic operator has access to the necessary economic and financial standing. The statements of support must establish a legal obligation for the party concerned and state that the involved economic operators or entities are subject to joint and several liability for the performance of the contract.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Award Criteria
Description
Please refer to the Criteria and Method of Evaluation. As part of the evaluation of tenders, the contracting authority will also conduct individual interviews with all Key Staff proposed for the position as Team Leader (in compliant tenders). Please refer to the Instructions to Tenderers.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
Please refer to the Criteria and Method of Evaluation.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark
From the notice
The African Guarantee Fund - for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Ltd (AGF) is a non-bank financial institution established to enhance access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across Africa. Its activities include the provision of guarantees to financial institutions and capacity development support to both lenders and SMEs. AGF was one of five concrete initiatives recommended by the Commission on Effective Development Cooperation with Africa in 2010, and has now been in operation for almost 15 years. Denmark was a founding shareholder and has supported the AGF through a combination of shareholder capital, grant financing, and representation on the board. A 2016 evaluation of the results of the Africa Commission included an early assessment of AGF, which found the AGF to be relevant, innovative, and on a promising path, with rapid portfolio growth, strong interest from partner banks, and early indications that participating banks had increased the SME lending portfolio. At the same time, the evaluation noted that AGF was still at an early stage of implementation, and that systematic data on SME-level outcomes, employment effects, financial additionality, and long-term sustainability were not yet available, limiting the scope for assessing broader impacts. It also highlighted a key strategic challenge going forward: balancing the goal of becoming a self-sustaining, market-oriented guarantee fund with the need to expand into higher-risk markets and partner with lower-tier banks in order to maximise development impact. Since then, the AGF has expanded significantly in scale and geographical reach, and has progressively developed its monitoring and evaluation systems, while a longer operational time horizon now provides a much stronger basis for assessing outcomes, additionality, sustainability and longer-term impacts. To document results and draw lessons from AGF’s experience and the Danish support hereto, the Department for Evaluation, Learning and Quality (LEARNING) of the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has therefore decided to commission an evaluation. The overall purposes of the evaluation are to document and assess: (1) The contribution of the AGF to improving access to finance for SMEs in Africa and to generating associated development outcomes; and (2) The contribution and added value of Danish support to the AGF. And, based on this, draw lessons for AGF’s future strategy and operations, for future Danish support to the AGF specifically, and for future Danish support to SME development in Africa through blended finance instruments. The objectives of the evaluation are to: (1) Establish a structured and analytically grounded mapping and characterisation of AGF’s institutional model, blended finance architecture, portfolio evolution and positioning within the broader SME finance ecosystem as well as of Danish support to the AGF; (2) Assess, across time and geographical contexts, AGF’s relevance in addressing SME financing constraints; coherence with other initiatives in the SME finance space; success in mobilising private capital to support SME finance; and financial sustainability; (3) Assess the contribution and added value of Danish support, including capital, concessional grant funding, and governance engagement; (4) Generate credible quantitative evidence on the results of AGF-supported guarantees and capacity development in two country contexts, considering both financial and development additionality, and outcomes at both SME, PFI and broader SME finance market level; (5) Identify contextual, institutional, and design factors that explain observed results and variation across countries, instruments, and institutional settings; (6) Formulate lessons learned and forward-looking, evidence-based recommendations to inform AGF’s future strategy and Denmark’s future engagement with the AGF and guarantee-based blended finance instruments more broadly.Main features of the procedureAccess to the procurement procedure requires online registration. Guidance (in Danish and English) on the use of the tendering system can be found at: https://mercell.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/3/article/177996038?src=1869524006 Economic operators may only submit one application (request to Participate) or tender. Economic operators must submit a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) as preliminary evidence, that the economic operator is not subject to exclusion grounds and that the economic operator fulfils the requirements for economic and financial standing and technical and professional ability. When the economic operator is participating together with others or if the economic operator relies on the capacity of other entities, each participating economic operator must provide a separate ESPD. In Part III.A-C of the ESPD, economic operators must answer whether they are subject to exclusion grounds, listed in section 2.1.6 of this contract notice. An economic operator is not required to answer whether it is subject to purely national exclusion grounds, cf. Part III.D of the ESPD. The contracting authority has a maximum budget of DKK 4,500,000 net of VAT in relation to the procurement. Tenders will be rejected if they exceed the contracting authority's maximum budget. The assignment will include evaluation of Danida-funded projects/programmes. Therefore, economic operators must submit declarations of prior and ongoing involvement from the economic operator and each involved Key Staff. Decisions on whether a conflict of interest or unfair competition exists rest with the contracting authority and are made on a case-by-case basis. Economic operators will not receive remuneration for their participation in the procedure.
Contact
Ninja Ritter Klejnstrupniklej@um.dk- Competition · PrequalificationType
- 79419000Main codeEvaluation consultancy services
- 66171000Financial consultancy services75211200Foreign economic-aid-related services79412000Financial management consultancy services