Gas Storage Denmark: Onshore Intervention Services related to wells on natural gas storage LOT 1-3: 2027-2034

Description

The tender should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 1 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 1. Further the solution description should include: 1. A description of the tenderer’s solution for a Petro Physical interpretation report based on Appendix 2A, section 11, Attachment F&G, including - proposed layout of logs and - description of compatibility with old log 2. Detailed description including a Technical & Cost pro-posal related to the Works as described in section 5.1 in Appendix 2, focusing on: - A Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks for the specific job 3. Description of technical training requirements for all operators/crews, cf. Appendix 2A, section 5. 4. Description on handling of self-powered unit(s) related to the Works, focusing on: - Technical datasheet - Description of grounding requirements, stand-ards, instruction and how Tenderer assures this task to be fulfilled on site. 5. Technical information on equipment supplied to Well site: - Type of wireline unit - Transport/delivery of lubricator and BOP. - Rig up of Equipment. 6. Tool specification, as described in section 6 in Appendix 2A (except 6.1.4 Perforation), covering well as detailed in Appendix 2A, Section 11, Attachment F. The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solu-tion description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 1 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 1. That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: 1. • The interpretation report of the pulsed neutron logging data can combine the results with old data from previous logs • The layout of the report gives an easy overview of the combined data No. 1 is weighted with 30% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 2. • A well-structured and detailed Technical & Cost proposal description including a technical descrip-tion and drawings of the equipment identified for the Works. • The identified Operational and QHSE risks, includ-ing methods for mitigating the risks, are specified to the Works, relevant, considered preventive and presented in a structured manner. 3. • A well-structured procedure for conducting specif-ic task training including instruction of opera-tors/crews, that ensures that all statutory and necessary training and instruction is conducted be-fore the operators/crews arrive on site. 4. • A well-structured procedure with focus on key risk factors for the specific task including review of lo-cal information and documentation for installing temporary units on GSD site. An overall evaluation of no. 2-6 will be made and weighted with 70% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 5. • The equipment is suitable for onshore operations and can ensure an optimized operation on site, meaning that operations will involve a minimum of trucks, personnel and lifting operations. 6. • A well-structured and detailed description of each tool proposed including a technical description and drawings. An overall evaluation of no. 2-6 will be made and weighted with 70% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.

Evaluation Method

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Description

The tenderer should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 2 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 2. Further the solution description should include: 1. Detailed description related to the Works as described in section 1 and 2 in Appendix 2, using work case of Install/retrieve wire line set DHSV's. - Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks for the specific Service 2. Description of technical training requirements for all operators/crews, cf. Appendix 2A, section 5. 3. Description on handling of self-powered unit(s). - Technical datasheet - Description of grounding requirements, stand-ards, instruction and how tenderer assures this task to be fulfilled on site. 4. Technical information on equipment supplied to Well site: - Type of wireline unit o Single or dual drum - Transport/delivery of lubricator and BOP. - Rig up of equipment. 5. Tool specification, as described in Appendix 2A, section 6, covering well as detailed in Appendix 2A, Section 11, Attachment E&F. 6. Description of mobilization upon receiving a work re-quest, including time schedule, which should include expected timespan for: - Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks - Preparation of equipment - Mobilization to site in Denmark The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solu-tion description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 2 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 2. That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: 1. • A well-structured and detailed Technical & Cost proposal focusing on a technical description and drawings of the equipment identified for the Works. • The identified Operational and QHSE risks, includ-ing methods for mitigating the risks, are specified to the Works, relevant, considered preventive and presented in a structured manner. No. 1 is weighted with 30% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 2. • A well-structured procedure for conducting specific task training including instruction of operators/crews, that ensures that all statutory and necessary training and instruction is conducted before the operators/crews arrive on site 3. • A well-structured procedure with focus on key risk factors, that ensures that review of local legislation and documentation for installing temporary units on site is conducted. 4. • The equipment is suitable for onshore operations and can ensure an optimized operation on site, meaning that operations will involve a minimum of trucks, personnel and lifting operations. An overall evaluation of no. 2-6 will be made and weighted with 70 % of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 5. • A well-structured and detailed description of each tool proposed including a technical description and drawings. 6. • A well-structured and detailed description of each action. The expected timespan for each activity, including all relevant and necessary activities, is realistic. An overall evaluation of no. 2-6 will be made and weighted with 70 % of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.

Evaluation Method

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Description

The tender should include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 3 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 3. Further the solution description should include: 1. Detailed description related to the Works as described in section 1 and 2 in Appendix 2, using “case for evaluation purpose” of cleaning sand fill above perforations out of well as on well, see Appendix 2A, section 11, Attachment E. - A Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks for the specific Works. 2. A detailed inspection report with a description of inspection of all equipment necessary for the Service, including - Place and date of inspection - Status for equipment 3. A description of technical training requirements for all operators/crews, cf. Appendix 2A, section 5. 4. A description on handling of self-powered unit(s). (Coil unit, Pumping unit, Nitrogen unit. - Technical datasheet - A description of grounding requirements, standards, instruction and how tenderer assures this task to be fulfilled on site. - Rig up of equipment. 5. A description of the required mixing and storage tanks that are supplied for the Works. 6. A description of well test package allowing to clean out and flow Gas well after sand cleanout. Low Noice Flare stack required as part of package 7. A description of mobilization upon receiving a work re-quest, including time schedule, which should include expected timespan for: - Technical & Cost proposal - Identification of Operational and QHSE risks and methods for mitigation of these risks - Preparation of equipment - Mobilization to site in Denmark The Contracting Authority will evaluate the proposed solu-tion description in relation to the scope and complexity of the tendered assignment, cf. Appendix 2: Scope of Works LOT 3 and 2A: Technical and Functional Requirements LOT 3. That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such, especially concerning: 1. • A well-structured and detailed Technical & Cost proposal focusing on a technical description and drawings of the equipment identified for the Works. • The identified Operational and QHSE risks including methods for mitigating the risks, are specified the Works, relevant, considered preventive and pre-sented in a structured manner. No. 1 is weighted with 30% of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 2. • There is a structured procedure for inspection of the tools at Supplier’s base – prior to shipment to GSD • The inspection procedure ensures that alle equip-ment is in working condition before the Works are initiated 3. • A well-structured procedure for conducting specif-ic task training including instruction of opera-tors/crews, that ensures that all statutory and necessary training and instruction is conducted be-fore the operators/crews arrive on site. 4. • A well-structured procedure with focus on key risk factors, that ensures that review of local legisla-tion and documentation for installing temporary units on site is conducted. • The equipment is suitable for onshore operations and can ensure an optimized operation on site, meaning that operations will involve a minimum of trucks, personnel and lifting operations. An overall evaluation of no. 2-7 will be made and weighted with 70 % of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. 5. • There is a structured presentation/listing of the tenderers available mixing and storage tanks that are possible for fulfilling the actual Works. 6. • There is a structured presentation/listing of the tenderers proposed well-test-package that is pos-sible for fulfilling the actual Works. 7. • A well-structured and detailed description of each action. The expected timespan for each activity, including all relevant and necessary activities, is realistic. An overall evaluation of no. 2-7 will be made and weighted with 70 % of this sub-criterion. See further description on scoring of Solution description in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1.

Evaluation Method

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Description

Prices must be stated in the attached Price List LOT 1 (see Appendix 3) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate (for evaluation purposes) the total cost for Supply of Services (Cell F10), the total cost for Operations (Cell F27) and the total cost for Equipment, tools and operator (Cell F52) separately. The weighing of each price element of the total price score is: - Supply of Services (5%) - Operations (50%) - Equipment, tools and operator (45%) See further description on scoring of Price in sections 4.2 and 4.2.1 below.

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Description

Prices must be stated in the attached Price List LOT 2 (see Appendix 3) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will eval-uate (for evaluation purposes) the total cost for Supply of Services (Cell F6), the total cost for Operations (Cell F26) and the total cost for Equipment, tools and operator (Cell F60) separately. The weighing of each price element of the total price score is: - Supply of Services (5%) - Operations (50%) - Equipment, tools and operator (45%) See further description on scoring of Price in sections 4.2 and 4.2.1 below.

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Description

Prices must be stated in the attached Price List LOT 3 (see Appendix 3) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will eval-uate (for evaluation purposes) the total cost for Supply of Services (Cell G11), the total cost for Personnel (Cell G33), the total cost for Operations (Cell G57) and the total cost for Equipment, tools and operator (Cell G99) separately. The weighing of each price element of the total price score is: - Supply of Services (5%) - Personnel (35%) - Operations (30%) - Equipment, tools and operator (30%) See further description on scoring of Price in sections 4.2 and 4.2.1 below.

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Description

The Tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Contract Terms” include the following (if applicable): A list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms, cf. below documents: • Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 25/18898-5) • Appendix 0: Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 25/18898-6) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The Contracting Authority encourages the tenderer to include any deviations in Appendix 0A: Clarification List under sheet “Legal Clarification”. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. Except for the following sections in: In the Framework Agreement for LOT 1 (doc. no. 25/18898-5) o Clause 2 – Contract Documents o Clause 13 – Disputes & Applicable Law In the Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 1 (doc. no. 25/18898-6) o Clause 2 – Documents forming the Agreement In General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) o Sub-Clause 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 – Contract Price and Payment o Clause 23 – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI Act) o Clause 26 – Disputes & Applicable Law which is not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”. These terms are mandatory. It is possible for the Tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion” Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and therefore absolute fulfilment of the contract terms, will result in a maximum score of ten (10). An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. See further description on scoring of Contract Terms in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below.

Evaluation Method

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Description

The Tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Contract Terms” include the following (if applicable): A list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms, cf. below documents: • Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 25/18899-3) • Appendix 0: Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 25/18899-5) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The Contracting Authority encourages the tenderer to include any deviations in Appendix 0A: Clarification List under sheet “Legal Clarification”. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. Except for the following sections in: In the Framework Agreement for LOT 2 (doc. no. 25/18899-3) o Clause 2 – Contract Documents o Clause 13 – Disputes & Applicable Law In the Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 2 (doc. no. 25/18899-5) o Clause 2 – Documents forming the Agreement In General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) o Sub-Clause 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 – Contract Price and Payment o Clause 23 – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI Act) o Clause 26 – Disputes & Applicable Law which is not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”. These terms are mandatory. It is possible for the Tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evalua-tion of the sub-criterion” Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the ten-derer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and therefore absolute fulfilment of the contract terms, will result in a maximum score of ten (10). An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. See further description on scoring of Contract Terms in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below.

Evaluation Method

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Description

The Tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Contract Terms” include the following (if applicable): A list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms, cf. below documents: • Framework Agreement LOT 3 (doc. no. 25/18900-3) • Appendix 0: Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 3 (doc. no. 25/18900-5) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The Contracting Authority encourages the tenderer to include any deviations in Appendix 0A: Clarification List under sheet “Legal Clarification”. The tendered assignment must be performed based on the attached contract terms. Except for the following sections in: In the Framework Agreement for LOT 3 (doc. no. 25/18900-3) o Clause 2 – Contract Documents o Clause 13 – Disputes & Applicable Law In the Agreement under Framework Agreement LOT 3 (doc. no. 25/18900-5) o Clause 2 – Documents forming the Agreement In General Terms and Conditions for Services (doc. no. 25/12155-39) o Sub-Clause 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 – Contract Price and Payment o Clause 23 – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI Act) o Clause 26 – Disputes & Applicable Law which is not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”. These terms are mandatory. It is possible for the Tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evalua-tion of the sub-criterion” Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the ten-derer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and therefore absolute fulfilment of the contract terms, will result in a maximum score of ten (10). An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of four (4) must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. section 3.7.1. See further description on scoring of Contract Terms in section 4.2 and 4.2.2 below.

Evaluation Method

Source

No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.