Installation of pipes with horizontal directional drilling (HDD) under Guldborgsund and Roskilde Fjord - 23/03722
Published deadline passed
The published deadline has passed. For multi-stage competitions a later tender deadline may still apply — check the notice or portal for the current phase.
- Qualification deadline
- Jul 10,Expired
- Award
- Technical solution 14% and 3 more
Brief
Energinet Eltransmission A/S søger entreprenører til horisontal styret boring (HDD) og installation af PE-rør til etablering af kabelgennemføringer for nye 145 kV kabelsystemer og fiberforbindelser under Guldborgsund og Roskilde Fjord. Kontrakten har en estimeret totalværdi på 147 millioner DKK og en varighed på 7 måneder. Arbejdet er opdelt i to delaftaler: Lot 1 omfatter to rørføringer under Guldborgsund (ca. 1.254 m og 1.207 m), og Lot 2 omfatter én rørføring under Roskilde Fjord (ca. 1.755 m). Tilbud kan afgives på én eller begge delaftaler. Tildelingskriterierne vægtes som følger: Pris (35,7143%), Teknisk løsning (14,2857%), Organisation (7,1429%), Tidsplan (7,1429%) og Kontraktvilkår (7,1429%). For at kvalificere sig skal ansøgere for Lot 1 have en egenkapital på mindst 28 mio. DKK og en egenkapitalandel på mindst 20% fra seneste årsrapport. Hvis egenkapitalandelen er mellem 15% og 20%, kan ansøger kvalificere sig, hvis egenkapitalen overstiger 85,75 mio. DKK.
Bredbåndsutbygging
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Qualification requirements
Description
Egenkapital fra siste årsrapport må, på tidspunktet for mottak av tilbud, være minst 28 millioner DKK/3,753 millioner EUR.
Documentation Requirement
Søkeren må bekrefte økonomisk evne i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapital. Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører, må informasjonen for ESPD del IV.B også gis i et separat ESPD fra hver av disse enhetene. Det er søkerens eget ansvar å sikre at minimumskravene er oppfylt basert på konsolidering når søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller når søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Egenkapitalandelen fra siste årsrapport må, på tidspunktet for prekvalifisering, være minst 20 prosent. Hvis egenkapitalandelen er mellom 15 prosent og 20 prosent, kan tilbyderen kvalifisere dersom egenkapitalen overstiger 85,75 millioner DKK/11,494 millioner EUR.
Documentation Requirement
Søkeren må bekrefte økonomisk evne i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapitalandel. Dette må oppgis med to desimaler. Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører, må informasjonen for ESPD del IV.B også gis i et separat ESPD fra hver av disse enhetene. Det er søkerens eget ansvar å sikre at minimumskravene er oppfylt basert på konsolidering når søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller når søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Award Criteria
Description
Prices must be stated in the attached Schedule of Prices and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total cost - Total Tender Price, cf. Schedule of Prices.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
The evaluation will be based on the submitted technical description, including method statements specifications and descriptions which demonstrate the technical level for executing the works specified in the tender documents. The work shall be based on a tender engineering approach ensuring that that the proposed drilling setup is robust even if the soil characteristics differ from the expected. The tenderer must include Method Statements and engineering reports from the Pre-FEED covering all phases of the Works. Reference is made to Technical Requirements (doc. no. 23/03722-1). The evaluation will be based on the degree of detail and the technical level of specifications and the level of content in the Method Statement(s). It will be evaluated positive if the tenderer submits detailed descriptions that in content and clarity demonstrate fulfilment of all technical requirements stated in the tender documents. Further, it will be evaluated positive that the approach and chosen solutions underline the tenderer’s ability and use of competences to execute the works, especially concerning: * Assessment of technical and environmental risks and proposed mitigations * Quality plan * Method statements * Engineering document proving that the proposed drilling setup is robust even if the soil characteristics differ from the expected * Contingency plans for handling blow-outs * Specification of specialized equipment and drilling rigs and drilling bits, including considerations concerning redundancy of key equipment * Specification of materials to be used * Specification of PE pipe configuration * Specification of the PE pipes proposed. * Specification of drilling mud * Specification of seals * State the anticipated amount of water for performing the drilling * Preliminary drawings of drilling profile * Specifications of working areas * Specification of onshore spread
Evaluation Method
It will be evaluated positive if the tenderer submits detailed descriptions that in content and clarity demonstrate fulfilment of all technical requirements stated in the tender documents. Further, it will be evaluated positive that the approach and chosen solutions underline the tenderer’s ability and use of competences to execute the works, especially concerning:
- Assessment of technical and environmental risks and proposed mitigations
- Quality plan
- Method statements
- Engineering document proving that the proposed drilling setup is robust even if the soil characteristics differ from the expected
- Contingency plans for handling blow-outs
- Specification of specialized equipment and drilling rigs and drilling bits, including considerations concerning redundancy of key equipment
- Specification of materials to be used
- Specification of PE pipe configuration
- Specification of the PE pipes proposed.
- Specification of drilling mud
- Specification of seals
- State the anticipated amount of water for performing the drilling
- Preliminary drawings of drilling profile
- Specifications of working areas
- Specification of onshore spread
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
As the Works is of immense importance for the Client, the tenderer must enclose CVs of the key personnel who will be allocated to the Works. The following are considered as key personnel: * Project manager * Site staff foreman * HSE responsible * H&S Coordinator (AMK-B) * Quality Manager The tenderer is encouraged to highlight only the expertise and experience for each key personnel relevant for the position in the respective CVs (e.g. educational background, experience within that position, experience with similar assignments etc.). Further, the tenderer should submit an Organization Plan. The Organization Plan should include a detailed description of the project specific organizational structure down to site staff foreman level which will be allocated to the Works during all phases of the Works. The Organization Plan description should describe: * The overall structure, including hierarchy and procedures for escalation. * Lines of communication, internally and externally * Interfaces towards the Contracting Authority. * How the tenderer will secure coverage of all positions at all time The Organization Plan must be described in detail as well as visualized in a project specific organization chart.
Evaluation Method
The evaluation of key personnel will be based on the degree to which the experience and professional qualifications of the individual key personnel is up to date, relevant in respect of the performance and position of the specific assignment. As such a relevant educational background combined with relevant roles in recent projects of similar characteristics will be evaluated positively. Further, the evaluation will focus on to which degree the individual key personnel will be involved in the fulfilment of the assignment and how the key personnel complement each other. The evaluation of the Organization Plan will be based on the degree of detail and:
- On whether the proposed plan is project specific, operational, efficient, robust and with clear lines of communication.
- On whether the organization is well-structured with coverage for all interfaces taking into consideration the complexity of the Works
- On the coverage of all positions and possibility to scall in manpower during execution in order to fulfil the project time schedule
An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
The tenderer should include the Project Time Schedule in the tender. The Project Time Schedule must be project specific and include all activities executed by the tenderer concerning the Works. The tenderer should as part of the sub-criteria include a detailed and robust time schedule for each lot which outlines how the works will be structured through FEED and Detailed Engineering, construction and pipe installation phases, and delivery of as-built documentation. Delays associated with inspections and verifications shall be made clear, if known. The time schedule should contain relevant project milestones including the milestones outlined in the tender documents. Reference is made to the Time Schedule for the relevant LOT (LOT 1: 23/03722-34 or LOT 2: 23/03722-35). The time schedule should be included both in the form of a chart (GANTT-diagram) with clarifications as needed, in a supporting and elaborate description.
Evaluation Method
The evaluation of the Time Schedule will be based on the level of detail and robustness/timeliness for all phases of the Works. The evaluation of the detailed Project Time Schedule prepared by the tenderer and included in the tender will be based on the degree of detail and division into sub-tasks to prove for the Employer, that the Contractor has the capacity to do the Works in accordance within the time frame specified in the Clients Time Schedule(s). The Contracting Authority will evaluate the degree to which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out in the Tender Documents. In this context it will be evaluated positive that:
- the description and schedule reflect a realistic, but front-loaded schedule for the critical activities
- hazardous activities are not performed concurrently in the same location
- the division into sub-sections ensures that the tenderer has the capacity to perform in accordance with the overall project time schedule.
- the description and schedule reflect the tenderer’s ability to catch-up on delays and shows activities to activate
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the tenderer is allowed to propose deviations to the elements of the contract identified as competitive elements in the contract terms. The contract terms consist of: * Contract Agreement for Guldborgsund, doc.no. 23/03722-15 (lot 1) * Contract Agreement for Roskilde Fjord, doc.no. 23/03722-38 (lot 2) * Appendix 1 [General Conditions based on AB18], doc.no. 23/03722-16 (both lots) The deviations should be enclosed in the clarification list c.f. doc.no. 23/03722-6 and be included in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification”. The submitted clarification list should be clearly marked “Lot 1” or “Lot 2”. The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered contract must be performed on the basis of the contract terms. The tenderer is allowed to propose explicit and well-explained deviations to the following listed competitive elements: * In the Contract Agreements, doc.no. 23/03722-15 (lot 1) and doc.no. 23/03722-38 (lot 2): * Section 5 [Contract Data] In terms of: * Liquidated damages and maximum liquidated damages (Clause 40, subclause (2)) under [Clause 40. The contractor’s liability in case of delay] * In Appendix 1 [General Conditions based on AB18], doc.no. 23/03722-16 (both lots): * Clause 12 [Services to be provided by the contractor] * Clause 26 [Obstacles] * Clause 31. Construction meetings * Chapter E [Extension of time and delay] * Chapter F [Handover] * Chapter G [Defects] * Clause 59 [The client’s right to terminate the contract]
Evaluation Method
Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of 10 will be awarded. An overall evaluation for each lot will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Energinet Eltransmission A/S
From the notice
The Contracting Authority wants to purchase horizontal directional drilling activities including installation of PE-pipes for establishing two sets of cable crossings for new 145 kV cable sys-tems and fiber connections across Guldborgsund (two pipe sets, two cable systems, LOT 1) and Roskilde Fjord (one pipe set, one cable system, LOT 2). The underground power cables will be installed by another Contractor by means of Watucab by utilizing the smaller pipes inside a bigger pipe. The Fibre Optical Cables (FOC) will be installed in dedicated pipes for this purpose. This tender concerns all pipes involved – both the smaller pipes and the bigger pipe on the outside. For further details regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. The value of the contracts is expected to amount to total 147 Mio. DKK The tender is divided into the following lots: Lot 1: Cable crossings for new 145 kV cable systems and fiber connections across Guldborgsund. Two pipe sets, two power cable systems oPipe #1 from Falster to Lolland. Estimated length 1,254 m oPipe #2 from Falster to Lolland. Estimated length 1,207 m Lot 2: Cable crossings for new 145 kV cable systems and fiber connections across Roskilde Fjord: One pipe set, one power cable system oPipe #1 from Roskilde Fjord West – East landings. Estimated length 1,755 m Tenders can be submitted for one or all partial agreements
Contact
Procurement - Aprocurement@energinet.dk- Competition · PrequalificationType
- 45120000Main codeTest drilling and boring work
- 45231600Construction work for communication lines45262422Subsea drilling work45314300Installation of cable infrastructure