Search
  • Search

    LOT 1 - Variable Shunt Reactors for outdoor installation for SLF02 and NEA

    Energinet Eltransmission A/S

    LOT 1 - Variable Shunt Reactors for outdoor installation for SLF02 and NEA

    1. Contract start date

      Feb 19, 12:00 AMFebruary 19, 2026 12:00 AM

    2. Contract signed

      Feb 19, 12:00 AMFebruary 19, 2026 12:00 AM

    3. Result notice published

      Mar 11, 8:31 AMMarch 11, 2026 8:31 AM

    4. Contract end date

      Jun 30, 2030 12:00 AMJune 30, 2030 12:00 AM

    Brief

    Denmark: Tenders/Energinet Eltransmission A/S/LOT 1 - Variable Shunt Reactors for outdoor installation for SLF02 and NEA

    Awarded

    The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.

    Qualification deadline
    Mar 10,Expired
    Award
    Technical solution 19% and 2 more
    Procedure
    With negotiationTwo stages
    Agreement
    Buying goodsuntil Jun 2030

    Brief

    Energinet Eltransmission A/S har inngått en avtale med Hitachi Energy Denmark A/S og Grid Solutions Denmark, Filial af Grid Solutions SAS, Frankrig om å levere 15 variable shuntreaktorer med 2 opsjonsenheter for utendørs installasjon, med en spenning på 400 kV og en effekt på 70-140 Mvar, til en total verdi på 108 467 678 euro. Leveransen skal skje i Sydjylland, Fyn, Vest- og Sydsjælland, og Østsjælland. Det ble stilt krav til teknisk løsning, inkludert design, komponenter, prosesser og verktøy, samt korrosjonsbeskyttelse på nivå C5VH eller høyere, og et maksimalt lydnivå på 84 dB(A). Det var 3 deltakere i konkurransen.

    Elektrisk infrastruktur og veibelysning

    Result

    TED
    • Grid Solutions Denmark, Filial af Grid Solutions SAS, Frankrig
      Winner
    • Hitachi Energy Denmark A/S
      Winner
    • Number of bids
      3
    • Contract value
      €108,467,678

    Custom Assessment Criteria

    • Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria

      Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender

    Will you bid?

    The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.

    Award Criteria

    • Description

      Prices must be stated in Appendix 3: Price List (Lot 1 doc. no. 24/10093-19, Lot2 doc. no. 24/10093-29 and Lot3 doc. no. 24/03003-39) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total cost for each Lot individually, cf. the Appendix 3: Price lists (Lot 1 doc. no. 24/10093-19, Lot2 doc. no. 24/10093-29 and Lot3 doc. no. 24/10093-39). The evaluation of prices for each Lot is based on “Total price” in EUR from row 17&18 and column G in sheet “Total Eval price for each Lot Prices must be stated in EU

      Evaluation Method

      The evaluation of prices for each Lot is based on “Total price” in EUR from row 17&18 and column G in sheet “Total Eval price for each Lot

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the below should be enclosed: For each Lot the tenderer should include a technical solution description which - In detail describes the proposed solution (including design, components, processes, tools to be used etc.) and - Which demonstrates how and to which degree the competitive specifications as set out by the Contracting Authority, cf. the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-15 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26, are fulfilled, including any advantages elements. The tenderer should be thorough and precise when describing the technical solution, including technical advantages elements and level of fulfilment, as any insecurities and discrepancies may affect the evaluation negatively. Please note that all parts of the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26, concerning sound level, e.g. section 5.3.(sound enclosure), 11 and 13.3, will be evaluated as part of the sub-criteria “Sound level” and therefore will not be included in the evaluation of “Technical solution”. Further, please note that the elements marked in yellow in the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26 are mandatory, cf. section 2.7.1 of the present Tender Conditions, and therefore are not included in the evaluation. In the evaluation of “Technical Solution”, the Contracting Authority will emphasize the following: The extent to which the detailed technical solution supports the delivery of high performing, well designed and robust reactors considering the scope and content of the assignment, cf. the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26. In this context, the elements listed below – and the fulfilment or lack thereof – are of particular importance: • General design - the overall technical solution for the shunt reactor design, including dimensions and accessibility. • Corrosion protection (cf. 5.5 Paint and surface treatment), including whether the protection level is higher or lower than C5vh and how all parts are treated. • Core type • Weight and Size, taking into consideration how this will affect the requirements for the foundations and stations • Tap changer (if applicable) and variation range (cf. 8. Tap Changer) • Oil type (physical characteristics such as sulphur) • Bushings (cf. 7. High-voltage connections and Bushings) • FAT- and SAT-procedure (cf. 6.5 Factory Acceptance Tests and Site Acceptance tests) The characteristics stated in the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26 are considered as an acceptable level of fulfilment. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criteria

      Evaluation Method

      In the evaluation of “Technical Solution”, the Contracting Authority will emphasize the following: The extent to which the detailed technical solution supports the delivery of high performing, well designed and robust reactors considering the scope and content of the assignment, cf. the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26. In this context, the elements listed below – and the fulfilment or lack thereof – are of particular importance: * General design - the overall technical solution for the shunt reactor design, including dimensions and accessibility. * Corrosion protection (cf. 5.5 Paint and surface treatment), including whether the protection level is higher or lower than C5vh and how all parts are treated. * Core type * Weight and Size, taking into consideration how this will affect the requirements for the foundations and stations * Tap changer (if applicable) and variation range (cf. 8. Tap Changer) * Oil type (physical characteristics such as sulphur) * Bushings (cf. 7. High-voltage connections and Bushings) * FAT- and SAT-procedure (cf. 6.5 Factory Acceptance Tests and Site Acceptance tests) The characteristics stated in the Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26 are considered as an acceptable level of fulfilment. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criteria

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      The evaluation will be based on a detailed and specific technical solution for the sound level, including: - Chosen methods, - Processes and tools for guaranteed sound power level. The evaluation of guaranteed sound level (cf. section 11. Sound Level in Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26is performed in 3 steps: Step 1): a. If the guaranteed sound power level is higher than the maximum value accepted the solution will be rejected as the minimum technical requirement is not fulfilled. b. If the guaranteed sound power level is equal to or lower than the maximum value accepted, the sound level is within an acceptable range - the score is preliminary set to a value of 5 (five), and the evaluation continues to step 2. Step 2): a. If NO external sound damping method is used to obtain the guaranteed value, the evaluation continues to step 3. b. If ANY external sound damping method is used to obtain the guaranteed value, the preliminary grade is reduced depending on the extent of the applied sound damping method: i. If Sound Panels (e.g., sandwich panels) are used, 3 (three) points will be deducted. ii. If Sound Screen is used, 3 (three) points will be deducted. iii. If Sound Housing is used, 5 (five) points will be deducted. (See note *) below for further description and definition of sound damping methods.) After the preliminary grade is reduced, the evaluation continues to step 3. Step 3): a. If sound power level is EQUAL TO the maximum value accepted by the Contracting Authority, the obtained preliminary score is the result of the evaluation. b. If sound power level is LOWER than the maximum value accepted by the Contracting Authority, the final score is obtained by adding 1 (one) point to the preliminary score for every dB the guaranteed sound power level is lower than the required maximum value. The final score cannot exceed the value 10 (ten), so no extra credit will be given for sound levels more than 10 dB lower than the maximum value. *) Note Definition of type of sound damping method (Step 2b i-iii). i. Sound Panels are panels attached directly to the tank wall, only partly covering one or more sides of the tank (e.g., sandwich panels). ii. Sound Screen is attached to the tank usually covering one or more complete sides. Typically, a screen is also installed with some centimetre distance between tank and screen, so valves, jacking points etc. must be accessed through hatches in the sound screen. iii. Sound Housing is an enclosure which surrounds the main tank, and it includes a roof. A sound house typically requires a separate or specially designed foundation.

      Evaluation Method

      The evaluation of guaranteed sound level (cf. section 11. Sound Level in Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 63kA, doc. no. 24/10093-16 and Appendix 2A: Technical Specifications 80kA, doc. no. 24/10093-26is performed in 3 steps:

      Step 1):
      a. If the guaranteed sound power level is higher than the maximum value accepted the solution will be rejected as the minimum technical requirement is not fulfilled.
      b. If the guaranteed sound power level is equal to or lower than the maximum value accepted, the sound level is within an acceptable range - the score is preliminary set to a value of 5 (five), and the evaluation continues to step 2.

      Step 2):
      a. If NO external sound damping method is used to obtain the guaranteed value, the evaluation continues to step 3.
      b. If ANY external sound damping method is used to obtain the guaranteed value, the preliminary grade is reduced depending on the extent of the applied sound damping method:
      i. If Sound Panels (e.g., sandwich panels) are used, 3 (three) points will be deducted.
      ii. If Sound Screen is used, 3 (three) points will be deducted.
      iii. If Sound Housing is used, 5 (five) points will be deducted.
      (See note *) below for further description and definition of sound damping methods.) After the preliminary grade is reduced, the evaluation continues to step 3.

      Step 3):
      a. If sound power level is EQUAL TO the maximum value accepted by the Contracting Authority, the obtained preliminary score is the result of the evaluation.
      b. If sound power level is LOWER than the maximum value accepted by the Contracting Authority, the final score is obtained by adding 1 (one) point to the preliminary score for every dB the guaranteed sound power level is lower than the required maximum value. The final score cannot exceed the value 10 (ten), so no extra credit will be given for sound levels more than 10 dB lower than the maximum value.

      *) Note Definition of type of sound damping method (Step 2b i-iii).
      i. Sound Panels are panels attached directly to the tank wall, only partly covering one or more sides of the tank (e.g., sandwich panels).
      ii. Sound Screen is attached to the tank usually covering one or more complete sides. Typically, a screen is also installed with some centimetre distance between tank and screen, so valves, jacking points etc. must be accessed through hatches in the sound screen.
      iii. Sound Housing is an enclosure which surrounds the main tank, and it includes a roof. A sound house typically requires a separate or specially designed foundation.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the tenderer is allowed to propose deviations to the elements of the contract identified as competitive elements in the contract terms: • Contract Agreement (doc. no. 24/10093-11, 24/10093-21 and 24/10093-31), • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 24/10093-12), • Appendix 4 Time and Payment Schedule, (doc. no. 24/10093-20, 24/10093-30 and 24/10093-40) The deviations should be enclosed in the clarification list c.f. doc. no. 24/10093-10 and be included in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification”. The proposed deviations should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. Contract terms listed in section 2.7.1 are mandatory parts and deviations to these are not accepted. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. The tenderer is allowed to propose explicit and well-explained deviations to the listed competitive elements and the evaluation of “contract terms” will be based on the deviations. It should be noted that any deviation might impact the score as this is dependent on the content, clarity and consequence of the deviation. The following elements are considered competitive elements: • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase and, where relevant, same Clauses and Sub-Clauses in the Contract Agreements: o Clause 2 (Requirements), except for Sub-Clause 2.3, 2.5 and 2.6 o Sub-clause 4.6 (Advance payment guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. Sub-Section 2.7.1 above) o Clause 9 (Time of Delivery) o Clause 11 (Intellectual property rights) o Clause 12 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Clause 13 (Defects and remedies) o Clause 14 (Limitation of liability) o Clause 15 (Product liability) o Clause 16 (Insurance) o Clause 17 (Indemnification) o Clause 18 (Performance guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 2.7.1 above) o Sub-Clause 20.3 (HSE requirements) o Clause 25 (Termination) • Appendix 4: Time and Payment Schedules Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of 10 will be awarded. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of 4 must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 2.7.1.

      Evaluation Method

      The tenderer is allowed to propose explicit and well-explained deviations to the listed competitive elements and the evaluation of “contract terms” will be based on the deviations. It should be noted that any deviation might impact the score as this is dependent on the content, clarity and consequence of the deviation. The following elements are considered competitive elements: * Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase and, where relevant, same Clauses and Sub-Clauses in the Contract Agreements: o Clause 2 (Requirements), except for Sub-Clause 2.3, 2.5 and 2.6 o Sub-clause 4.6 (Advance payment guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. Sub-Section 2.7.1 above) o Clause 9 (Time of Delivery) o Clause 11 (Intellectual property rights) o Clause 12 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Clause 13 (Defects and remedies) o Clause 14 (Limitation of liability) o Clause 15 (Product liability) o Clause 16 (Insurance) o Clause 17 (Indemnification) o Clause 18 (Performance guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 2.7.1 above) o Sub-Clause 20.3 (HSE requirements) o Clause 25 (Termination) * Appendix 4: Time and Payment Schedules Deviations to these elements will be included in the evaluation and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction of the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which are intended to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. If the tenderer has no deviations to the contract terms, the maximum score of 10 will be awarded. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. Please note that a minimum score of 4 must be achieved for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 2.7.1.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    Previous winners

    • Who are you up against?

      The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Energinet Eltransmission A/S

    From the notice

    • 15 + 2 optional 400 kV 70-140Mvar - Reaktorer • Lot1 consists of 5 units on 400kV, 70-140Mvar 63kA • Lot2 consists of 5 + 1 optional units on 400kV, 70-140Mvar 63kA + • Lot3 consists of 5 +1 optional units on 400kV, 70-140Mvar 80kA Variable Shunt Reactors Rated voltage Ur: 400kV Power rating: 70-140 Mvar Regulation Range: 50 % or above Type of regulation: onload (OLTC) Cooling: ONAN Maximum sound power level: 84 dB(A), prefer-ably lower, (at max. operating voltage 420 kV) Corrosion Protection: C5VH or above Max. operating voltage Umax: 420 kV Frequency: 50 Hz Magnetic characteristic: The core must be linear up to 1.5 times rated voltage.

    • Contact

      Procurement - Bprocurement@energinet.dk
    • Type
      Result · Prequalification
    • Location
      Sydjylland, Sydjylland, Sydjylland, Fyn, Vest- og Sydsjælland, Østsjælland, Sydjylland, Sydjylland, Sydjylland
    • Main code
      Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting
      31000000
    • 31170000Transformers

    Similar active competitions

    • HOFOR Fjernvarme P/S

      Elektrisk utstyr og belysning

      SMC-6.2 Power Transformer and 132 kV Gas Insulated Switchgear

      HOFOR Fjernvarme P/S is procuring the design, manufacture, factory testing, delivery, site assembly, testing, commissioning and handover of power transformers and 132 kV SF₆-free gas-insulated switchgear for the Svanemøllen Energy Centre in Copenhagen. The procurement is divided into two lots: transformers, including cooling systems, accessories, documentation and training; and GIS, including local control cubicles, monitoring equipment, accessories, documentation and training. The maximum total contract value is EUR 10 million. The negotiated competition has prequalification followed by tendering and evaluation; up to four applicants per lot will be invited to tender, with negotiations expected. Lot 1 applicants must provide at least two completed references from the past five years for comparable or higher-rated power transformers, including factory acceptance testing and site commissioning support. Award criteria for each lot are price (45%), technical solution and project execution (15%), commercial and contractual terms (7.5%), and health and safety (5%).

      Competition with qualification
      Nov 27, 2026(28 days)
      €10,000,000

    • EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG

      Rock Dumping Services

      1. Introduction The Scope of Work (SoW) defines the requirements, methodologies, and deliverables for the provision of Rock Dumping Services, including the design, supply, installation, and verification of rock berms for the protection and stabilization of subsea cables, CPS, Foundations, and related offshore infrastructure. The services are to be executed at the designated offshore wind farm locations in the German North Sea sector, Baltic Sea Sector or any other european offshore wind farm location. 2. Objectives Protection of Subsea Assets: To protect subsea cables, cable protection systems (CPS), and foundations from environmental and operational risks, such as scouring, freespan, and mechanical damage. Stabilization: To ensure long-term stability and integrity of subsea infrastructure by installing engineered rock berms. Compliance: To execute all works in accordance with applicable international standards, project specifications, and client requirements. 3. Scope of Work 3.1 General Description The Contractor shall provide a complete service package, including but not limited to: Project management and engineering Design of rock berms and stabilization measures Procurement and supply of rock material Mobilization and demobilization of specialized vessels and equipment Execution of rock installation works Pre- and post-installation surveys Quality assurance and as-built documentation. 3.2 Project Engineering & Management Project Planning: Develop detailed project schedules, installation plans, and risk assessments. Design Services: Prepare or review CPS berm designs, including cross-sections, material specifications, and installation tolerances. The Contractor may advise on optimal design solutions from an operational perspective. Quality Management: Implement a project-specific Quality Management System (QMS) in line with ISO 9001:2015, ensuring all works meet client and regulatory standards. HSE Management: Develop and enforce a Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) plan, including job hazard analysis, toolbox talks, and stop-work authority for all personnel. 3.3 Design Requirements Example (will be defined case by case by specific project): Berm Geometry: Typical berm dimensions may include heights of ~1.1 m, widths of ~0.3 m, and slopes of 1:3, subject to project-specific requirements. Material Specification: Use freshly crushed rock, grading CP 45/180 or as specified, with a specific density of ~2.65 t/m³ and bulk density of ~1.56 t/m³. All rock must comply with EN 13383-1,2 standards. Tolerances: Vertical tolerance: -0.00/+0.50 m; Horizontal tolerance: -0.00/+2.00 m either side. Tolerances are to be verified by survey. Losses and Settlement: Account for installation losses (e.g., soil penetration, settlement, wash-away, compaction) in the design and quantity calculations. Execution Accuracy: Capable of precise berm installation according to design profile; Vertical Installation Tolerance -0,00/+0,50m 3.4 Mobilization & Demobilization Mobilization: Prepare and mobilize the designated rock installation vessel(s) at the port of origin. Calibrate and test all positioning, survey, and installation equipment prior to departure. Demobilization: Upon completion, demobilize all equipment and personnel, ensuring the site is left in a safe and compliant condition. 3.5 Rock Installation Operations 3.5.1 Equipment Vessels: Use dynamically positioned fall pipe vessels (DPFPV) or equivalent. Fall Pipe Systems: Deploy central and/or inclined fall pipe systems, equipped with ROVs for precise placement and monitoring. Inclined systems are used for close proximity to structures. Survey Systems: Utilize DGNSS, USBL, multibeam echosounders (MBE), and online 3D visualization packages for real-time monitoring and documentation. Vessel Requirement: Minimum DP2 fall pipe vessel 3.5.2 Sequence of Work Procurement of Rock Material: Source and stockpile rock at the designated quarry, ensuring compliance with design specifications and timely supply. Loading Operations: Load rock onto the vessel using conveyor belts or harbor cranes, with quantities verified by draft survey. Transit to Site: Sail to the offshore site, maintaining communication with client representatives. Pre-Installation Survey: Conduct detailed bathymetric and positioning surveys to establish the as-found condition of the seabed and infrastructure. Rock Placement: Execute rock dumping using DPFPV in auto-track mode, adjusting vessel speed and feeder output to achieve the required berm profile. Use ROVs and real-time monitoring tools to ensure accuracy. Intermediate Surveys: Perform check surveys during installation to monitor progress and adjust methodology as needed. Post-Installation Survey: Conduct final surveys to verify that the installed berm meets design specifications. Demobilization: Recover all equipment and return to port. 3.5.3 Special Operations Close Proximity Works: For rock placement near structures, use inclined fall pipe or tremie pipe systems, with standoff distances and positioning monitored by echo sounders and sonar. Remedial Works: If required, perform additional passes or remedial installations based on survey results. 3.6 Survey and Documentation Survey Deliverables: Provide as-built charts (DWG, PDF), DTM ASCII files, and comprehensive as-built reports. All data must be corrected for tide and quality-checked before submission. Acceptance: Survey data and as-built documentation are to be reviewed and accepted by the client’s offshore representative before demobilization. The exact requirements will be specified by the specific case and project. ___ All companies affiliated with EnBW within the meaning of Sections 15 et seq. of the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) shall be entitled to place orders.

      Qualification system
      Dec 16, 2028(100+ days)

    • Energinet Eltransmission A/S

      Diverse konstruksjonsmateriell

      Re-tendering - Framework agreement: Purchase of fittings for glass insulator strings 26/17723

      Energinet Eltransmission A/S needs to purchase complete glass insulator strings through a framework agreement over 4 years, with two options for extension of 2 years each, for a total potential duration of 8 years. The maximum total value of the agreement is 30,442,953 EUR. The procurement is divided into two lots: Lot 1 for complete glass insulator strings for powerlines, with an expected consumption of 10,000,000 EUR and a maximum value of 24,000,000 EUR; and Lot 2 for complete glass insulator strings for substations, with an expected consumption of 2,684,563.75 EUR and a maximum value of 6,442,953.00 EUR. Tenders can be submitted for one or both lots. The award criteria are Quality (41.6667%), Delivery time (16.6667% + 16.6667% = 33.3334%), and Price (25%). Qualification requirements include an equity of at least 2,500,000 EUR and an equity ratio of at least 20% (or 15-20% if equity exceeds 7,500,000 EUR) for Lot 1. Additionally, applicants must provide three to five comparable and relevant references from the past five years, with at least one reference demonstrating the supply of glass insulators for a transmission network with a voltage level of at least 132 kV.

      Framework agreement with qualification
      Nov 2, 2026(3 days)
      €30,442,953