NEA and SLF02 – Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems
Awarded
The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.
- Award
- Programme, organization and manpower 20% and 2 more
- Procedure
- With negotiationTwo stages
Brief
Energinet Eltransmission A/S has entered into an agreement with LS Cable & System Ltd and Taihan Cable & Solution Co., Ltd. for the delivery of approximately 490 km of 400 kV single-core XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km of 132 kV single-core XLPE-insulated land cable, including joints, terminations, and their installation, with a final contract value of 128,605,731 EUR. The procurement was divided into three lots (NEA and SLF02), and solutions with a welded aluminum sheath capable of carrying the full fault current without a wire screen were accepted. The evaluation prioritized price (55%), technical solution (15%), program, organization, and manpower (20%), and contract terms (10%). Four bids were received.
Elektrisk utstyr og belysning
Result
- LS Cable & System LtdWinner
- Taihan Cable & Solution Co., Ltd.Winner
- 4Number of bids
- €128,605,731Contract value
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Qualification requirements
Description
Søkeren må bekrefte økonomisk evne i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapital (total egenkapital inkl. aksjekapital, reserver, revaluering, tilbakeholdt fortjeneste osv.).
Documentation Requirement
Informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapital (total egenkapital inkl. aksjekapital, reserver, revaluering, tilbakeholdt fortjeneste osv.) i ESPD del IV.B. Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller søkeren er en gruppe av økonomiske aktører, må informasjonen for ESPD del IV.B også gis i en separat ESPD fra hver av disse enhetene.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Søkeren må bekrefte økonomisk evne i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapitalandel (egenkapital/totale eiendeler). Denne må oppgis med to desimaler.
Documentation Requirement
Informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapitalandel (egenkapital/totale eiendeler) i ESPD del IV.B. Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller søkeren er en gruppe av økonomiske aktører, må informasjonen for ESPD del IV.B også gis i en separat ESPD fra hver av disse enhetene.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
For LOT 1 – NEA, må egenkapitalen fra siste årsrapport, på tidspunktet for prekvalifisering, være minst EUR 14 200 000,00.
Documentation Requirement
Informasjon fra siste årsrapport.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Egenkapitalandelen fra siste årsrapport må, på tidspunktet for prekvalifisering, være minst 20 %. Hvis egenkapitalandelen er mellom 15 % og 20 %, kan søkeren kvalifisere dersom egenkapitalen overstiger EUR 42 550 000,00.
Documentation Requirement
Informasjon fra siste årsrapport.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Søkerens egnethet vil bli vurdert basert på teknisk og faglig evne. Evnen vil bli vurdert basert på referanser som kan fylles ut i ESPD del IV.C.
Documentation Requirement
For hvert parti kan søkeren sende inn opptil 3 (tre) mest sammenlignbare og relevante referanser utført de siste 5 (fem) årene som en del av søknaden. Med «utført de siste 5 årene» menes at referansen ikke må være fullført før datoen som er nådd når man teller 5 år tilbake fra innleveringsdatoen for prekvalifisering. Referanser eldre enn dette vil ikke bli tatt i betraktning. Referanser som ennå ikke er fullført, kan inkluderes som en del av søknaden, men søkeren må beskrive de delene som ennå ikke er levert. Hvis referanser er innhentet i samarbeid med andre parter, bør søkeren tydelig forklare hvilke elementer som er utført av søkeren. Referansene skal beskrive 220 kV (eller høyere) underjordiske kabelsystemer, og inkludere: en spesifikk beskrivelse av leveranser, inkludert: spenningsnivå, kabellengde, maksimale leveringslengder og utførte oppgaver (f.eks. design, fabrikasjon, fabrikktesting, levering, transport, konstruksjon (anleggsarbeider ikke inkludert), installasjon (skjøter og AIS-termineringer, koblingsbokser), ferdigstillelse, stedstesting, igangkjøring og overtakelsestesting av hele leveransen og dens systemer og funksjoner); beskrivelse av typeprøve (hvis utført), inkludert spenningsnivå ved halvledende lag; produksjons- og testanlegg for strømkablene; produksjons- og testanlegg for tilbehøret; leveringssted; informasjon om kontaktdata (navn, e-post og telefonnummer) for referanser; kontraktsverdi (hvis mulig); dato for igangsetting og endelig levering (dag, måned, år). Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller søkeren er en gruppe av økonomiske aktører, må maksimalt antall referanser fortsatt respekteres og kan ikke overstige 3 når de kombineres. Hvis flere sendes inn, vil oppdragsgiveren kun vurdere de nyeste referansene bestemt av dato for endelig levering, i dette tilfellet vil ikke uferdige referanser inkluderes. Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller er en del av en gruppe av økonomiske aktører, må informasjonen om ESPD del IV.C sendes inn i separate ESPD-er for hver enhet.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
For offentlige varekontrakter: I referanseperioden har den økonomiske aktøren levert følgende hovedleveranser av den spesifiserte typen.
Documentation Requirement
Oppdragsgivere kan kreve opptil tre år og tillate erfaring som dateres mer enn tre år tilbake. Dokumentasjon er ikke spesifisert utover dette.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Award Criteria
Description
When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned, realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded, programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark, with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further, interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values, and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored. In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation. It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively. 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively. 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance: Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively. 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Energinet Eltransmission A/S
From the notice
The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02. The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc. no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.Main features of the procedureThe tender is an EU Tender with negotiations. The tenders must be valid for a period of 6 months from the specified time limit for submission
Contact
Procurement - Aprocurement@energinet.dk- Result · PrequalificationType
- 31321300Main codeHigh-voltage cable
- 31300000Insulated wire and cable31320000Power distribution cables31340000Insulated cable accessories31343000Insulated cable joints