Negotiated procedure for more Trains to Aarhus Letbane

Cancelled

The competition has been cancelled.

Qualification deadline: Sep 7, 2025Expired
Award: Quality 40%
Procedure: With negotiationTwo stages
Agreement: Buying goodsover 8 years

Brief

Aarhus Light Rail har avlyst anskaffelsesprosessen for flere tog til Aarhus Letbane, med intensjon om å publisere et revidert anbud så snart som mulig. Anskaffelsen gjelder kjøp av åtte tog, med opsjon på ytterligere 12 tog, for å øke kapasiteten på enkeltsporede linjer, spesielt Grenaa-linjen, og forventes å ha en levetid tilsvarende kontraktens maksimale varighet på 8 år. Togene skal leveres i Østjylland. Årsaken til avlysningen er reviderte behov som krever vesentlige endringer i anbudsdokumentene, inkludert krav til aktivering av opsjoner og leverandørens håndtering av kundelevert utstyr.

Result

TED

Reason for cancellation
Besluttning av oppdragsgiveren på grunn av behovsendring
Number of bids
2

Custom Assessment Criteria

Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender

Will you bid?

The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.

Award Criteria

Description
Price consist of: - Initial purchase - Operational cost - Options for purchase of additional 12 trains - Option for Battery solution - Cost for battery solution for additional Trains The sub-criterion ‘price’ will be assessed on the basis of the answers provided by the Tenderer when filling in Appendix 7 – Tender List. The evaluation will be based on the Tenderer’s stated prices, exclusive of VAT, but inclusive of all other costs. The total evaluation price is automatically added up in Appendix 7 – Tender List, sheet 2: Pricelist. The total evaluation price consists of five (5) elements, each included with the percentage mentioned in Tender conditions, section 5.3.
Evaluation Method
The total evaluation prices will be evaluated relatively and based on a linear score model from 0 – 10 points. The ‘lowest total evaluation price’ among the compliant tenders cf. tender conditions, section 5.1, is awarded 10 points. A total evaluation price equal to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 20 % or above will be awarded 0 points, however, subject to the use of the below secondary and tertiary evaluation models if the conditions for this have been met.

If the following secondary or tertiary evaluation model is used, the above formula is adjusted accordingly.

The awarded points will be multiplied by the weighting of the price sub-criterion in the overall evaluation.

Secondary evaluation model
If it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of one or more of the compliant tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 20 %, X is fixed at 40 %. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 40 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points.

Tertiary evaluation model
If it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of one or more of the compliant tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 40 %, X will be increased by 10% until all compliant tenders can be contained or until X amounts to 100%. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus the increased value up to 100% will thus be awarded 0 points.
Sub-criteria
Initial purchase
Initial purchase: (is included with 100% of the price in the total evaluation price) The evaluation price element “Initial purchase” consist of the following three (3) prices: * 1) Price for eight (8) trains, * 2) price for initial purchase of components and * 3) price for initial purchase of special tools.
Operational cost
Operational cost (is included with 100% of the price in the total evaluation price) The evaluation price element “Operational cost” consist of the following five (5) prices: * 1) the cost of hourly maintenance for eight (8) trains in a period of eight (8) years, * 2) spare parts for preventive maintenance for eight (8) trains in a period of eight (8) years, * 3) Cost of energy consumption for eight (8) trains in a period of eight (8) years and * 4) the price for technical support (yearly fee) * 5) as well as an hourly fee times 500 hours, per year for a period of eight (8) years.
Option for additional 12 trains
Option for purchase of additional 12 trains (is included with 25% of the price in the total evaluation price) The evaluation price element “option for purchase of additional 12 trains” consist of the following two (2) prices: * 1) price for additional 12 trains and * 2) Additional price for one (1) order, ordered later than 24 months after signing the contract.
Option for battery solution
Option for battery solution (is included with 25% of the price in the total evaluation price) The evaluation price element “Option for battery solution” consist of the following seven (7) prices * 1) Additional price for trains for activation of the option for eight (8) trains * 2) Price for initial purchase of components and storage of such in a period of eight (8) years * 3) Annual fee for storage of battery package * 4) Price for additional special tools as a part of the initial purchase * 5) additional cost of hourly maintenance for eight (8) trains in a period of eight (8) years if option is activated * 6) Additional cost for spare parts for preventive maintenance for eight (8) trains in a period of eight (8) years if option is activated, * 7) Additional cost of energy consumption for eight (8) trains in a period of eight (8) years if option is activated.
Cost for battery solution for additional Trains
Cost for battery solution for additional Trains (is included with 25% of the price in the total evaluation price) The evaluation price element “Cost for battery solution for additional Trains” consist of the following one (1) price 1) Cost for battery solution for twelve (12) additional Trains
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
Sub-sub-criteria to Quality: Construction weight 40% Passengers comfort weight 40% Drivers Cabs weight 10% Method of collaboration with the manufacturers of Customer provided equipment weight 10% The sub-criterion Quality will be evaluated on the basis of the below mentioned sub-sub criteria and the answers provided by the Tenderer in Appendix 10 – Solution description.
Sub-criteria
Construction40%
The Sub-sub-criterion will be evaluated based on the tenderers’ answers for: - Appendix 10 – Solution description, section 2 An overview of what the Contracting Authority regard as positive in the evaluation can be found in Appendix 10 – Solution description, section 2.
Evaluation Method: Tenders are evaluated in accordance with an absolute model, cf. the points scale in Tender conditions, section 5.3.1. The Contracting Authority will make an overall assessment of the sub-sub-criterion. The evaluation parameters will be based on different levels of importance for the Contracting Authority. It will be specified if the parameter is Very important, Important or Normal. Very important parameters will always be evaluated higher than Important parameters. Important parameters will always be evaluated higher than Normal parameters. The Contracting Authority will assess whether the answer appears well-documented and binding.
Passengers' comfort40%
The Sub-sub-criterion will be evaluated based on the tenderers’ answers for: - Appendix 10 – Solution description, section 3 An overview of what the Contracting Authority regard as positive in the evaluation can be found in Appendix 10 – Solution description, section 3.
Evaluation Method: Tenders are evaluated in accordance with an absolute model, cf. the points scale in Tender conditions, section 5.3.1. The Contracting Authority must make an overall assessment of the sub-sub-criterion. The evaluation parameters will be based on different levels of importance for the Contracting Authority. It will be specified if the parameter is Very important, Important or Normal. Very important parameters will always be evaluated higher than Important parameters. Important parameters will always be evaluated higher than Normal parameters. The Contracting Authority will assess whether the answer appears well-documented and binding.
Drivers Cabs10%
The Sub-sub-criterion will be evaluated based on the tenderers’ answers for: - Appendix 10 – Solution description, section 4 An overview of what the Contracting Authority regard as positive in the evaluation can be found in appendix 10 – Solution description, section 4.
Evaluation Method: Tenders are evaluated in accordance with an absolute model, cf. the points scale in Tender conditions, section 5.3.1. The Contracting Authority will make an overall assessment of the sub-sub-criterion. The Contracting Authority will assess whether the answer appears well-documented and binding.
Method of collaboration with manufacturers of Customer Provided equipment10%
The Sub-sub-criterion will be evaluated based on the tenderers’ answers for: - Appendix 10 – Solution description, section 5 An overview of what the Contracting Authority regard as positive in the evaluation can be found in appendix 10 – Solution description, section 5.
Evaluation Method: Tenders are evaluated in accordance with an absolute model, cf. the points scale in Tender conditions section 5.3.1. The Contracting Authority will make an overall assessment of the sub-sub-criterion. The Contracting Authority will assess whether the answer appears well-documented and binding.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Previous winners

Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Aarhus Light Rail

From the notice

Contact
Elisabeth Hansenkontakt@tohv.dk
Type
Result · Prequalification
Location
Østjylland
Main code
Railway and tramway passenger coaches, and trolleybuses
34622000