Procurement of 3 noise reduction silencers including installation for Fjernvarme Fyns waste incineration lines 11, 12 and 13
Cancelled
The competition has been cancelled.
- Qualification deadline
- Nov 13, 2025Expired
- Award
- Price 30% and 1 more
Brief
Fjernvarme Fyn Affaldsenergi A/S har avlyst anskaffelsen av 3 støydempende lyddempere inkludert installasjon for avfallsforbrenningslinjene 11, 12 og 13 på Fyn, på grunn av endrede behov. Anskaffelsen hadde en estimert maksimal verdi på 6 millioner DKK. Det ble lagt vekt på teknisk løsning og ytelse (50%), pris (30%) og HMS (20%).
Industrimaskiner
Result
- Reason for cancellationBesluttning av oppdragsgiveren på grunn av behovsendring
- 2Number of bids
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Qualification requirements
Description
Leverandørens egenkapital må være positiv (over null). Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til en eller flere enheter (f.eks. et morselskap, søsterselskap eller underleverandør) eller er en gruppe økonomiske aktører (f.eks. et konsortium), må informasjon om ESPD del IV.B også gis i et separat ESPD for hver av disse enhetene. Det er søkerens ansvar å sikre at minimumskravet om egenkapital oppfylles samlet gjennom konsolidering når søknaden er basert på kapasiteten til andre enheter eller hvis søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører (f.eks. et konsortium).
Documentation Requirement
Søkeren må oppgi sin egenkapital (total egenkapital inkl. aksjekapital, reserver, revaluering, tilbakeholdt overskudd osv.) i samsvar med regnskapspraksis som gjelder for søkeren fra den senest tilgjengelige årsrapporten i ESPD del IV.B, 'Finansiell nøkkeltall'. Den senest tilgjengelige årsrapporten refererer til rapporten som er tilgjengelig på tidspunktet for [f.eks. søknadsfristen]. Som dokumentasjon vil oppdragsgiver be om den senest tilgjengelige årsrapporten(e).
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Award Criteria
Description
For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the below should be enclosed. All sub-sub criteria’s (1,2 and 3) will be evaluated equally in the total evaluation of this criterion: 1) The tenderer should include a detailed description of the proposed technical solution (all 3 silencers), including specific details concerning the components, subcomponents and materials that will be included. Accordingly, the following elements should be described in detail: • A detailed description of the proposed technical solution (all 3 silencers), including specific details concerning the components, subcomponents and materials that will be included. • Physical dimensions for each silencer and the appropriate construction especially considering access to service and maintenance for each silencer. The evaluation of the “Technical solution and access to service and maintenance” will be based on the tenderer’s description, and the Contracting Authority will in this respect emphasize that it is a reliable and robust solution, with an appropriate design and size that provides an easy way of conducting service and maintenance on each of the silencers. An overall evaluation with no decimals will be made of this sub-sub-criterion. 2) Noise reduction As part of the evaluation, the tenderer must also state the guaranteed performance of the silencers in terms of noise reduction under current conditions. (See the attached noise measurement in the special conditions clause 3.1 and 3.2 and Annex G). The performance must be stated in Annex 3. The tenderer should also include the calculations and/or documentation for the stated noise reduction in Annex 3. It should be noted the guaranteed performance stated by the tenderer will be penalized in the contract, cf. Clause 6.1.1. The evaluation of noise reduction will be based on the stated level as offered by the tenderer for each silencer. The silencer with the lowest guaranteed dB will count for 50% of the evaluation of this sub-sub-criterion and the two other silencers will each count for 25% of the evaluation. If the same dB is offered on all 3 silencers they will all count the same. • A noise reduction level of 15.00 dB (Decibel) or higher will result in a score of 10 for this sub-sub criterion, whereas a performance level of 5.00 dB will result in a score of 0. In between these two points, scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. An offered performance level below 5.00 dB on any of the silencers will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant. Example: Guaranteed noise reduction on Silencer 1: 9dB, Silencer 2: 10dB and silencer 3: 10 dB gives a weighed noise reduction of 9,50 dB (9,00 dB * 0,5 + 10,00 dB * 0,25 + 10,00 dB * 0,25 = 9,50 dB)which equals a score of 4,50 points. The overall evaluation will be given with 2 decimals. 3) Pressure loss over silencers As part of the evaluation the tenderer must also state the guaranteed performance of the silencers in terms of pressure loss over the silencers. The performance must be stated in Annex 3. The tenderer should also include the calculations and/or documentation for the stated noise reduction in Annex 3. It should be noted the guaranteed performance stated by the tenderer will be penalized in the contract, cf. Clause 6.1.1. The evaluation of pressure loss over the silencers will be based on the average pressure loss level as offered by the tenderer. • An average pressure loss of 0.00 mbar (Millibar) will result in a score of 10, whereas a pressure loss of 5.00 mbar will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. An offered level above 5.00 mbar on any of the lines will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant,. This is also the case even if the average pressure loss is below 5.00 mbar. Example: Guaranteed pressure loss on Silencer 1: 1,00 mbar, Silencer 2: 1,75 mbar and silencer 3: 2,50 mbar gives an average pressure loss of 1,75 mbar which equals a score of 6,50 points. The overall evaluation will be given with 2 decimals.
Sub-criteria
- Technical solution and access to service and maintenance33%
The tenderer should include a detailed description of the proposed technical solution (all 3 silencers), including specific details concerning the components, subcomponents and materials that will be included. Accordingly, the following elements should be described in detail: • A detailed description of the proposed technical solution (all 3 silencers), including specific details concerning the components, subcomponents and materials that will be included. • Physical dimensions for each silencer and the appropriate construction especially considering access to service and maintenance for each silencer.
Evaluation Method: The evaluation of the “Technical solution and access to service and maintenance” will be based on the tenderer’s description, and the Contracting Authority will in this respect emphasize that it is a reliable and robust solution, with an appropriate design and size that provides an easy way of conducting service and maintenance on each of the silencers. An overall evaluation with no decimals will be made of this sub-sub-criterion.
- Noise reduction33%
As part of the evaluation, the tenderer must also state the guaranteed performance of the silencers in terms of noise reduction under current conditions. (See the attached noise measurement in the special conditions clause 3.1 and 3.2 and Annex G). The performance must be stated in Annex 3. The tenderer should also include the calculations and/or documentation for the stated noise reduction in Annex 3. It should be noted the guaranteed performance stated by the tenderer will be penalized in the contract, cf. Clause 6.1.1.
Evaluation Method: The evaluation of noise reduction will be based on the stated level as offered by the tenderer for each silencer. The silencer with the lowest guaranteed dB will count for 50% of the evaluation of this sub-sub-criterion and the two other silencers will each count for 25% of the evaluation. If the same dB is offered on all 3 silencers they will all count the same. A noise reduction level of 15.00 dB (Decibel) or higher will result in a score of 10 for this sub-sub criterion, whereas a performance level of 5.00 dB will result in a score of 0. In between these two points, scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. An offered performance level below 5.00 dB on any of the silencers will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant. Example: Guaranteed noise reduction on Silencer 1: 9dB, Silencer 2: 10dB and silencer 3: 10 dB gives a weighed noise reduction of 9,50 dB (9,00 dB * 0,5 + 10,00 dB * 0,25 + 10,00 dB * 0,25 = 9,50 dB)which equals a score of 4,50 points. The overall evaluation will be given with 2 decimals.
- Pressure loss over silencers33%
As part of the evaluation the tenderer must also state the guaranteed performance of the silencers in terms of pressure loss over the silencers. The performance must be stated in Annex 3. The tenderer should also include the calculations and/or documentation for the stated noise reduction in Annex 3. It should be noted the guaranteed performance stated by the tenderer will be penalized in the contract, cf. Clause 6.1.1.
Evaluation Method: The evaluation of pressure loss over the silencers will be based on the average pressure loss level as offered by the tenderer. An average pressure loss of 0.00 mbar (Millibar) will result in a score of 10, whereas a pressure loss of 5.00 mbar will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. An offered level above 5.00 mbar on any of the lines will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant,. This is also the case even if the average pressure loss is below 5.00 mbar. Example: Guaranteed pressure loss on Silencer 1: 1,00 mbar, Silencer 2: 1,75 mbar and silencer 3: 2,50 mbar gives an average pressure loss of 1,75 mbar which equals a score of 6,50 points. The overall evaluation will be given with 2 decimals.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
The Contracting Authority assigns points for “Price” as follows: Price is scored on a linear scale from 0 to 10. The tender with the lowest total price will be given the highest score, 10. The lowest total price is understood as the lowest calculated total price based on the Tenderlist (Annex 2) among all compliant tenders. All other tenders are then scored on a linear scale, using the initial interpolation percentage, cf. the table 1 below, and as a result the tender with the lowest total price will be given the score 10 and a tender which is 50 % higher will be given the score 0. If 1 or more of the compliant tenders comprise a total price which is higher than the initial percentages stated in the table 1 below, The Contracting Authority will use the alternative linear scale with the same scores, but with a greater span. As a result, the span will be set at the actual difference in percentage between the lowest calculated total price among all compliant tenders and the highest calculated total price among all compliant tenders. The Contracting Authority will not expand beyond the stated maximum in Alternative 1 and as a result tenders which comprise a total price which is equal to or higher than this percentage will be scored 0. All scores from 0-10 may be used (including decimals). Table 1 – Interpolation percentage, inclusive alternative Initial interpolation percentage: +50 % Alternative 1 percentage(s): Highest compliant total price percentage above 50 % but below 75 % (maximum)
Evaluation Method
Price is scored on a linear scale from 0 to 10. The tender with the lowest total price will be given the highest score, 10. The lowest total price is understood as the lowest calculated total price based on the Tenderlist (Annex 2) among all compliant tenders. All other tenders are then scored on a linear scale, using the initial interpolation percentage, cf. the table 1 below, and as a result the tender with the lowest total price will be given the score 10 and a tender which is 50 % higher will be given the score 0. If 1 or more of the compliant tenders comprise a total price which is higher than the initial percentages stated in the table 1 below, The Contracting Authority will use the alternative linear scale with the same scores, but with a greater span. As a result, the span will be set at the actual difference in percentage between the lowest calculated total price among all compliant tenders and the highest calculated total price among all compliant tenders. The Contracting Authority will not expand beyond the stated maximum in Alternative 1 and as a result tenders which comprise a total price which is equal to or higher than this percentage will be scored 0. All scores from 0-10 may be used (including decimals).
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the following should be enclosed: The tenderer should include a detailed HSE-plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) specifically for the tendered assignment, including detailed descriptions of risk management, on-site supervision, inspections and audits. The evaluation will be based on the submitted HSE-plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) for the specific project. It will be evaluated positive that the tenderer submits a proactive and detailed HSE-plan and RAMS for this specific assignment which - considering the complexity and scope - covers: • Detailed description of how risk assessments for the specific scope of work (health and safety) are conducted to ensure that risks are eliminated rather than mitigated, including identification of risks identified for the scope of work (dismantling and preparation for assembly including working at height etc.) • Detailed method statements which are relevant, safe to work by and show knowledge of the scope of work, especially considering dismantling and assembly of larger prefabricated parts (flue gas ducts, supports, insulation work etc.) An overall evaluation with no decimals will be made of this sub-criterion.
Evaluation Method
The evaluation will be based on the submitted HSE-plan and RAMS (Risk Assessment and Method Statements) for the specific project. It will be evaluated positive that the tenderer submits a proactive and detailed HSE-plan and RAMS for this specific assignment which - considering the complexity and scope - covers: * Detailed description of how risk assessments for the specific scope of work (health and safety) are conducted to ensure that risks are eliminated rather than mitigated, including identification of risks identified for the scope of work (dismantling and preparation for assembly including working at height etc.) * Detailed method statements which are relevant, safe to work by and show knowledge of the scope of work, especially considering dismantling and assembly of larger prefabricated parts (flue gas ducts, supports, insulation work etc.) An overall evaluation with no decimals will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at FJERNVARME FYN AFFALDSENERGI A/S
From the notice
The Contracting Authority wants to procure 3 new silencers placed in front of the stack to get a noise reduction if we run through or bypass the fluegas condesations units. The procurement is conducted as a negotiated procedure with prior call for competition pursuant to the EU Utilities Directive (Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC).
Contact
Asbjørn Kjærgaardx-askj@fjernvarmefyn.dk- Result · PrequalificationType
- FynLocation
- 42300000Main codeIndustrial or laboratory furnaces, incinerators and ovens
- 42390000Parts of furnace burners, furnaces or ovens45300000Building installation work