Search
  • Search
Finland: Tenders/Keva/Quantitative Analytics Platform (SaaS)

  1. Supplier selection

    Jul 3, 2024 12:00 AMJuly 3, 2024 12:00 AM

  2. Result notice published

    Jul 4, 2024 7:59 AMJuly 4, 2024 7:59 AM

Brief

Quantitative Analytics Platform (SaaS)

Published deadline passed

The published deadline has passed. For multi-stage competitions a later tender deadline may still apply — check the notice or portal for the current phase.

Qualification deadline
Jul 3, 2024Expired
Award
Price 20%
Procedure
Without prior noticeTwo stages
Agreement
Buying goods

Brief

Keva has arranged a public contract award procedure concerning Quantitative Analytics Platform (SaaS). The procurement was carried out in an open procedure. The official contract notice was published in Hilma-service, (www.hankintailmoitukset.fi) on March 27th 2024 and Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) on March 27th 2024. The deadline for the tenders was 9.00 hours on 29th April 2024. As a result of the procurement procedure, one tender was received in the open procedure which did not include all the mandatory annexes. The contracting entity suspended the procurement by decision dated June 10th 2024. Therefore, the tender was incompatible within the meaning of Section 40(3) of the Public Procurement Act (Act on Public Pro-curement and Concession Contracts, 1397/2016). According to Procurement Act subsection 1 of Section 40 in a direct procurement the Contracting Entity negotiates the terms and conditions of a procurement agreement with its selected suppliers without prior publication of a contract notice. According to Procurement Act point 1 of subsection 2 of Section 40 the Contracting Enti-ty may opt for direct procurement if no suitable tenders have been received in response to an open procedure as long as no essential changes are made to the terms and condi-tions of the original Call for Tenders. According to the government proposal (108/2016, pp. 133-134) direct procurement is an option if no tenders, or suitable tenders have been received in response to an open or re-stricted procedure. For example, a tender would not be suitable if it does not meet the contracting entity's needs or the subject of the procurement at all. It shall be a further condition that no essential change has occurred in the terms and conditions of the origi-nal call for tenders. For example, if the requirements for the suitability of the tenderer were lowered or waived, this would generally require a new notice. Contracting Entity received one Tender. The Tenderer fulfilled the set suitability requirements. During the review of the tenders, it was observed that the tender did not fulfill the re-quirements of the Call for tenders. The tender was not accompanied by the required annexes. As the tender did not comply with the Call for Tenders and its requirements, the contract-ing entity decided to suspend the procurement. No terms and conditions of the original Call for Tenders were changed. After suspending the procurement, The Contracting Entity received a tender and a price from the tenderer that fulfilled the requirements of the call for tenders. The tenderer from whom the direct procurement is made can meet the suitability requirements set out in the call for tenders. The contracting entity did not change the original call for tenders, including the suitability requirements.

Result

  • Number of tenders received
    0
  • Contract value
    $320,000

Custom Assessment Criteria

  • Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria

    Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender

Will you bid?

The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.

Award Criteria

  • Description

    Quality

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

  • Description

    Price

    Source

    No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

Previous winners

  • Who are you up against?

    The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Keva

From the notice

  • Keva has arranged a public contract award procedure concerning Quantitative Analytics Platform (SaaS). The procurement was carried out in an open procedure. The official contract notice was published in Hilma-service, (www.hankintailmoitukset.fi) on March 27th 2024 and Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) on March 27th 2024. The deadline for the tenders was 9.00 hours on 29th April 2024. As a result of the procurement procedure, one tender was received in the open procedure which did not include all the mandatory annexes. The contracting entity suspended the procurement by decision dated June 10th 2024. Therefore, the tender was incompatible within the meaning of Section 40(3) of the Public Procurement Act (Act on Public Pro-curement and Concession Contracts, 1397/2016). According to Procurement Act subsection 1 of Section 40 in a direct procurement the Contracting Entity negotiates the terms and conditions of a procurement agreement with its selected suppliers without prior publication of a contract notice. According to Procurement Act point 1 of subsection 2 of Section 40 the Contracting Enti-ty may opt for direct procurement if no suitable tenders have been received in response to an open procedure as long as no essential changes are made to the terms and condi-tions of the original Call for Tenders. According to the government proposal (108/2016, pp. 133-134) direct procurement is an option if no tenders, or suitable tenders have been received in response to an open or re-stricted procedure. For example, a tender would not be suitable if it does not meet the contracting entity's needs or the subject of the procurement at all. It shall be a further condition that no essential change has occurred in the terms and conditions of the origi-nal call for tenders. For example, if the requirements for the suitability of the tenderer were lowered or waived, this would generally require a new notice. Contracting Entity received one Tender. The Tenderer fulfilled the set suitability requirements. During the review of the tenders, it was observed that the tender did not fulfill the re-quirements of the Call for tenders. The tender was not accompanied by the required annexes. As the tender did not comply with the Call for Tenders and its requirements, the contract-ing entity decided to suspend the procurement. No terms and conditions of the original Call for Tenders were changed. After suspending the procurement, The Contracting Entity received a tender and a price from the tenderer that fulfilled the requirements of the call for tenders. The tenderer from whom the direct procurement is made can meet the suitability requirements set out in the call for tenders. The contracting entity did not change the original call for tenders, including the suitability requirements.

  • Contact

    Hankinnathankinnat@keva.fi
  • Type
    Result · Prequalification
  • Main code
    Software package and information systems
    48000000
  • 72000000IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

Similar active competitions

  • Etelä-Pohjanmaan elinvoimakeskus

    Systemutvikling og programmering

    Asiakaskokemuksen mittaus- ja analysointiratkaisu

    Työllisyys-, kehittämis- ja hallintokeskus hankkii skaalautuvan SaaS-palvelun asiakaskokemuksen mittaamiseen ja analysointiin. Ratkaisun tulee kerätä asiakaspalautetta automatisoidusti eri kanavista, hyödyntää tekoälyä palautteen analysoinnissa sekä tuoda asiakasymmärrys ja kehittämiskohteet organisaation johtamisen ja kehittämisen tueksi raportoinnin, rajapintojen ja integraatioiden avulla. Tarjoukset arvioidaan hinnan (70 pistettä) ja laadun (30 pistettä) perusteella.

    Competition
    Dec 7, 2026(24 days)

  • Helsingin kaupunki, kaupunkiympäristön toimiala

    Programvareprodukter og lisenser

    Kaavan tuotantojärjestelmän hankinta

    Kulttuurin ja vapaa-ajan toimiala, Helsingin kaupunki, tarvitsee kaavan tuotantojärjestelmän hankintaa, jolla pystytään tuottamaan kansallisen kaavatietomallin mukaista asema- ja yleiskaavaa ja toimittamaan ne Suomen ympäristökeskuksen ylläpitämään rakennetun ympäristön tietojärjestelmään viimeistään vuoden 2029 alusta alkaen. Hankinta sisältää ohjelmistopalvelun käyttöoikeudet, ylläpidon ja tuen sekä kiinteähintaisen käyttöönottoprojektin, ja tarvittaessa erikseen tilattavia koulutus-, jatkokehitys- ja asiantuntijapalveluja. Tarjoukset arvioidaan hinnan (40 %) ja laadun (60 %) perusteella. Tarjoajalla tulee olla käytössään tietoturvapolitiikka ja hallintakeinot tietoturvan toteuttamiselle, ja sen tulee toimittaa pyydettäessä vapaamuotoinen kuvaus tietoturvan hallinnastaan tai olla sertifioitu johonkin seuraavista standardeista: ISO/IEC 27001, Katakri 2020, SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, FINCSC, CIS Critical Security Controls (IG1, IG2 tai IG3). Lisäksi tarjoajalla tulee olla käytössä ympäristöjärjestelmä, esim. ISO 14001, tai sen tulee muulla tavoin osoittaa ottavansa huomioon palvelutoimintansa ympäristövaikutukset.

    Competition
    Nov 23, 2026(10 days)

  • Keva

    Juridiske tjenester

    Työoikeudellisten palvelujen hankinta

    Keva hankkii työoikeudellisia palveluja yhdeltä palveluntuottajalta toistaiseksi voimassa olevalla sopimuksella. Hankinta kattaa Kevan työoikeudellisten asioiden oikeudelliset palvelut; Keva ei sitoudu vähimmäisostoihin. Tarjoukset arvioidaan laadun (75 %) ja hinnan (25 %) perusteella.

    Competition
    Dec 11, 2026(28 days)