Framework agreement concerning Meter Container Units
Awarded
The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.
Medisinsk og laboratorieutstyr
Energinet Gastransmission A/S har inngått en rammeavtale med Bohlen & Doyen Bau GmbH om å levere målercontainerenheter for måling av gassmasseflyt til reverseflow-anlegg i Danmark. Avtalen har en varighet på 4 år, med opsjon på 2+2 år, og en estimert totalverdi på 6,5 millioner euro. Det forventes å bli bestilt ti målercontainerenheter totalt. Kvalitet ble vektlagt med 75%, inkludert løsningsbeskrivelse, kvalitetsstyring, tidsplan, leveringstid og prosjektledelse, mens pris ble vektlagt med 25%. Én leverandør deltok i konkurransen.
Result
- Winner
- Bohlen & Doyen Bau GmbH
- Number of bids
- 1
- Contract value
- Not stated
- Maximum framework agreement value
- Up to €6,500,000
About the bid
- Contact name
- Procurement - A
- Contact phone
- +45 70102244
- Contact email
- procurement@energinet.dk
- Address
- Tonne Kjærsvej 65, 7000 Fredericia
The Contracting Authority intends to install several reverseflow plants for injection of upgraded biogas/biomethane from the natural gas distribution grid into the natural gas transmission grid in Denmark. Meter container units for measurement of the gas mass flow are part of the reverse flow plant design. Therefore, the Contracting Authority intends to purchase meter container units for measurement of the gas mass flow are part of the reverse flow plant design. For further details regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. The tendered framework agreement has a duration of 4 years. The framework agreement can be extended for 2x2 years. Orders under the framework agreement will be allocated directly to the supplier which, in the view of the Contracting Authority, has submitted the most economically advantageous tender, see section 4.1. The estimated consumption during the term of the framework agreement is expected to amount to seven (10) meter container units in total. The estimated number of units is the following: - Two (2) meter container units each for ID 1, ID 2, and ID 3.b - One (1) meter container unit each for ID 3.c, ID 4, ID 6, and ID 7 The framework agreement consists of an initial call-off of two (2) meter container units, each of the following: ID 2, ID 3.b or ID 3.c. The initial call-off of two (2) meter container units will be awarded on the basis of the award of the framework agreement to the tenderer that achieves the highest score, cf. section 4.2. Following the abovementioned orders, four (4) meter container units are expected to be ordered, which is expected to be one of each of the following: ID 4, ID 6, ID 1, and ID 7. The value of the framework agreement is expected to amount to EUR 6.500.000. The consumption figures are estimates only and are consequently not binding for the Contracting Authority. During the specified period, the Contracting Authority has the right to purchase the services and/or goods comprised by the framework agreement from the selected tenderer, but is not obligated to do so, cf. the framework sec. 1.3.
Custom Assessment Criteria
Start a free trial to ask your own questions about the tender and get AI-generated answers.
Award Criteria
Description
When evaluating 'Price’, the Contracting authority will evaluate the grand total, contract price, cf. the Appendix 3: Schedule of Prices (doc. no. 24/15046-7). The tenderer must fill in all open items (green cells) in Appendix 3: Schedule of Prices for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.
Description
When evaluating 'Solution Description', The Contracting Authority will evaluate the submitted proposal including the degree to which tenderer complies with Appendix 2: Scope of Work (doc. no. 24/15046-1), including the scope and content of any reservations in relation thereto. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: a) Modification of container • It will be evaluated positively if the proposed solution for door assemblies, recommended reinforcements and ventilation systems are fit for purpose. b) Procedure for replacement • It is evaluated positively if the procedure for replacement of the meter elements includes clear step by step operations and easy access for all activities required for replacement. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Description
For the sub-criterion 'Quality management’, the Contracting Authority will evaluate to which degree the Tenderer provides assurance as to the quality of production. The evaluation will therefore include the Tenderer’s ability to ensure quality in the entire production and across all interfaces and will be evaluated to the extend the requirements from the technical specification as well as the requirements from standards are met. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: a) Fabrication processes: • It is evaluated positive that manufacturing interfaces are kept at a minimum to prevent unnecessary risk. b) Inspection and Test Plan (ITP): • It is evaluated positively that references to internal quality procedures and quality procedures of sub-suppliers are included to ensure that quality requirements are met. • It is evaluated positively that involvement of third-party inspection is specified in the ITP and time is allowed for the activities. c) Quality management systems: • It is evaluated positively if the tenderer and relevant sub-supplier have implemented third-party certified systems to support quality management. d) Sub-supplier management: • It is evaluated positively if relevant sub-supplier are assessed and approved. e) CE marking: • It is evaluated positively that third-party involvement is specified, and intervention points are identified for the CE marking process. f) Document control system: • It is evaluated positively if the document control system includes internal review and approval steps for master record data book (MRB) to reduce the time of follow up during review. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Description
For the evaluation of 'Time Schedule’, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the degree to which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, especially concerning: a) Time schedule for project execution • It will be evaluated positively if the description and schedule reflect a realistic, but frontloaded schedule for the critical activities. • It will be evaluated positively if the schedule reflects sufficient time for 3rd party engagement. • It will be evaluated positively if the schedule adequately allows for the delivery of supplies provided by the Contracting Authority during the course of the project execution. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Description
The evaluation of 'Delivery time’ will be based on the stated delivery time as offered by the tenderer: • A maximum delivery time of up to 16 weeks will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 28 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation.
Description
Evaluation of the sub-criterion 'Project management’ will be based on the competences and experiences demonstrated in the included visual chart illustrating the organizational structure. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: • It will be evaluated positively if the proposed organizational structure is operational, efficient and has clear lines of communication. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Description
The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. With the exception of the above-mentioned clauses and sections in sub-section 3.7.1 in this document, which are not part of the evaluation of 'Contract terms', it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion 'Contract terms' and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.
Qualification requirements
Description
Søkeren må bekrefte økonomisk evne i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapital (total egenkapital inkl. aksjekapital, reserver, revaluering, tilbakeholdt fortjeneste osv.). Egenkapital fra siste årsrapport må, på tidspunktet for prekvalifisering, være minst 500 000 EUR.
Documentation Requirement
Informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapital i ESPD del IV.B. Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til en eller flere enheter (f.eks. et tilknyttet selskap eller en underleverandør) eller søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører (f.eks. et konsortium), må informasjonen for ESPD del IV.B også gis i en separat ESPD fra hver av disse enhetene.
Description
Søkeren må bekrefte økonomisk evne i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapitalandel (egenkapital/totale eiendeler). Dette må oppgis med to desimaler. Egenkapitalandel fra siste årsrapport må, på tidspunktet for prekvalifisering, være minst 20 %. Hvis egenkapitalandelen er mellom 15 % og 20 %, kan søkeren kvalifisere hvis egenkapitalen overstiger 3 000 000 EUR.
Documentation Requirement
Informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapitalandel i ESPD del IV.B. Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til en eller flere enheter (f.eks. et tilknyttet selskap eller en underleverandør) eller søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører (f.eks. et konsortium), må informasjonen for ESPD del IV.B også gis i en separat ESPD fra hver av disse enhetene.
Description
Utvelgelse av de best egnede søkerne vil baseres på referanser angående teknisk og faglig evne i ESPD del IV.C. Det skal leveres opptil fem (5) mest sammenlignbare og relevante referanser utført de siste tre (3) årene som del av søknaden. Med «utført de siste tre (3) årene» menes at referansen ikke må være fullført før datoen som nås når man teller tre (3) år tilbake fra innleveringsdatoen for prekvalifisering. Referanser eldre enn dette vil ikke bli tatt i betraktning. Referanser som ennå ikke er fullført kan inkluderes som del av søknaden, men søkeren må beskrive de delene som ennå ikke er levert, og dette kan påvirke evalueringen av søkeren. Referansene skal demonstrere omfattende erfaring med leveranser som er sammenlignbare med det utlyste oppdraget med hensyn til løsning, kompleksitet, omfang og formål, spesielt angående levering av modifiserte containerenheter lik det utlyste oppdraget i et miljø med klima- og værforhold lik Danmark, inkludert håndtering av kundeleveranser og modifisering av containere som skal brukes i anleggsdesign for returstrøm (installasjon, programmering og testing).
Documentation Requirement
Opptil fem (5) mest sammenlignbare og relevante referanser utført de siste tre (3) årene som del av søknaden i ESPD del IV.C. Referansene skal inkludere: en spesifikk beskrivelse av arbeidet utført for hver referanse, inkludert en beskrivelse av de modifiserte standardcontainerne levert, sammen med antall enheter levert og tjenester levert som del av referansen; referanse til direktiver brukt for myndighetsgodkjenning; kontraktsverdi (hvis mulig); kontaktinformasjon for den aktuelle enheten (inkludert kontaktperson); dato for oppstart og endelig levering (dag, måned, år). Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til en eller flere andre enheter (f.eks. et morselskap eller søsterselskap eller en underleverandør) eller søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører (f.eks. et konsortium), må det maksimale antallet referanser som skal sendes inn fortsatt respekteres og kan ikke overstige 5 når de kombineres. Hvis mer enn 5 referanser sendes inn, vil oppdragsgiveren kun vurdere de 5 nyeste referansene bestemt av dato for endelig levering (i dette tilfellet vil ikke uferdige referanser inkluderes). Hvis søkeren baserer seg på andre enheters kapasitet eller er del av en gruppe økonomiske aktører, må informasjonen angående ESPD del IV.C sendes inn i separate ESPD-er for hver enhet.
Previous Contract Winners
Start a free trial to see who has won similar tenders for this buyer.
See the full notice
- Contracting authority
- Energinet Gastransmission A/S
- Title
- Framework agreement concerning Meter Container Units
- Type
- Main code
- Supplemental codes
- Estimated value
- €9,100,000.00
- Duration
- 4 years