Procurement of high-pressure pump unit for brine injection for the water injection project in Stenlille, Gas Storage Denmark
Cancelled
The competition has been cancelled.
- Qualification deadline
- Jun 25, 2025Expired
- Award
- Technical solution 25% and 3 more
Brief
Gas Storage Danmark A/S har avlyst konkurransen om levering av en høytrykkspumpenhet for saltlakeinjeksjon til vanninjeksjonsprosjektet i Stenlille, Vest- og Sydsjælland, på grunn av manglende finansiering. Kontrakten skulle inkludere installasjon, igangkjøring, dokumentasjon og overlevering, samt inspeksjoner etter det første driftsåret. Den maksimale totale kontraktsverdien var satt til 15 millioner danske kroner, og prosjektets varighet var planlagt til 2 år.
Grunnarbeid, anleggsvirksomhet og snøbrøyting
Result
- Reason for cancellationBesluttning av oppdragsgiveren på grunn av manglende finansiering
- 0Number of bids
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Qualification requirements
Description
Søkeren må bekrefte den økonomiske evnen i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra den siste årsrapporten angående følgende økonomiske indikatorer: 1. Egenkapital (total egenkapital inkl. aksjekapital, reserver, revaluering, beholdt resultat etc.) 2. Egenkapitalandel (egenkapital/totale eiendeler). Dette må oppgis med to desimaler.
Documentation Requirement
Informasjon fra den siste årsrapporten skal oppgis i ESPD del IV.B.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Egenkapital fra siste årsrapport må ved prekvalifisering være på minst EUR 200.000.
Documentation Requirement
Dokumentasjon fra siste årsrapport.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Egenkapitalandel fra siste årsrapport må ved prekvalifisering være på minst 20 %. Hvis egenkapitalandelen er mellom 15 % og 20 % kan søkeren kvalifisere seg hvis egenkapitalen overstiger EUR 600.000.
Documentation Requirement
Dokumentasjon fra siste årsrapport.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Søkeren må dokumentere oppfyllelse av krav angående teknisk og faglig evne i ESPD del IV.C: • Inntil 5 mest sammenlignbare og relevante referanser utført de siste tre (3) årene som en del av søknaden.
Documentation Requirement
Referansene skal inkludere: o En spesifikk beskrivelse av arbeidet som er utført for hver referanse, inkludert: o Konfigurasjon angående pumpestørrelse, media og generell pumpeanleggskapasitet. o Beskrivelse av pumpetype og system. o Referanse til direktiver som brukes for myndighetsgodkjenning. o Kontraktverdi (om mulig) o Kontaktinformasjon for enheten i spørsmål (inkludert kontaktperson) o Dato for igangsetting og endelig levering (dag, måned, år)
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Award Criteria
Description
Prices must be stated in the attached Price List and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated DKK. Prices must be stated in the attached Price List and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in DKK
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
The tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Technical solution” include the following: • A detailed and specific technical description with dimensions, maximum working pressures, etc. of all parts, • drawings and associated part lists as well as assembly drawings (draft), • list of recommended spare parts, and service conditions regarding installation on site in Denmark. When evaluating “Technical solution”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate whether the tenderer documents a technically high-quality solution, i.e. to which extent the proposed design and materials are suitable taking into consideration the intended purpose. Further, the following be evaluated positive: • The overall energy consumption is as low as possible. • The robustness of pump system operational capability i.e. capability to perform load changes and there are long maintenance intervals between overhauls. • That the calculation and simulation method for overall system design focuses on mitigating operational risks and system failures i.e. pump trips. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Evaluation Method
When evaluating “Technical solution”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate whether the tenderer documents a technically high-quality solution, i.e. to which extent the proposed design and materials are suitable taking into consideration the intended purpose. Further, the following be evaluated positive:
- The overall energy consumption is as low as possible.
- The robustness of pump system operational capability i.e. capability to perform load changes and there are long maintenance intervals between overhauls.
- That the calculation and simulation method for overall system design focuses on mitigating operational risks and system failures i.e. pump trips.
An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
As part of the evaluation the tenderer must state the maxi-mum guaranteed delivery time from contract commencement date until final delivery as of-build documentation and project close-out The evaluation of “Delivery time” will be based on the stated delivery time as offered by the tenderer: • A maximum delivery time of up to 14 months will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 24 months or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given based on linear interpolation. • Any tender that states a delivery time longer than 24 months will be considered non-compliant and excluded cf. section 3.7.1
Evaluation Method
The evaluation of “Delivery time” will be based on the stated delivery time as offered by the tenderer:
- A maximum delivery time of up to 14 months will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 24 months or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given based on linear interpolation.
- Any tender that states a delivery time longer than 24 months will be considered non-compliant and excluded cf. section 3.7.1
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
As the project is of importance to Gas Storage Denmark as it is a critical component, the tenderer must provide assurance to production of high quality taking into consideration the criticality of the project. The tenderer may as part of the description(s) include how obtained standards are used to ensure quality at all stages. The tender should include: • Project plan • Quality plan • Time Schedule The tenderer should include a project plan and a detailed time and activity schedule with dates, and outline how the work will be structured from the contract commencement date until final delivery as of-build documentation and project close-out. The overall project plan and time schedule with dates shall include: A. Manufacturing process and delivery on site B. Installation process C. Commissioning procedures D. Final documentation handed over The tender must also fill out the template for a generic time in the column regarding delivery, installation, commissioning and final documentation handed over cf. Appendix 4: Time Schedule (doc. no. 25/07216-20) The tender version of the Quality plan shall include description concerning: A. The quality control system B. How the tenderer fulfills the quality requirements outlined by Energinet C. Inspection plan D. Fabrication plan When evaluating “Project- and quality plan and time Schedule”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate to which degree the tender provides assurance as to the quality of production and which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, that secure delivery within the timeline. Further, the following will be evaluated positive: • The project plan will be evaluated on its robustness and activities for the achieving the optimal design is within the time schedule. • The quality plan will be evaluated on how the tenderer fulfill the quality requirements outlined by Energinet including total project quality, design, fabrication, inspection, and test as well as pre-commissioning and commissioning. • The time schedule will be evaluated on its robustness and that schedule reflects a realistic, but frontloaded schedule for the critical activities, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Evaluation Method
When evaluating “Project- and quality plan and time Schedule”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate to which degree the tender provides assurance as to the quality of production and which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, that secure delivery within the timeline.
Further, the following will be evaluated positive:
- The project plan will be evaluated on its robustness and activities for the achieving the optimal design is within the time schedule.
- The quality plan will be evaluated on how the tenderer fulfill the quality requirements outlined by Energinet including total project quality, design, fabrication, inspection, and test as well as pre-commissioning and commissioning.
- The time schedule will be evaluated on its robustness and that schedule reflects a realistic, but frontloaded schedule for the critical activities, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery.
An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the below should be enclosed: If the tenderer includes a list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms: • Contract Agreement for Purchase (doc. no. 25/07216-11), • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 25/07216-12), the tenderer must use the Clarification List (doc. no. 25/07216-6). The proposed deviations to the contractual terms must be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. The tenderer may, however, suggest explicit and well-explained deviations to the contractual terms which the Contracting Authority has identified as competitive criteria’s below: • Contract Agreement for Purchase (doc. no. 25/07216-11): o Section 5, sub-clause 12.1 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Section 5, sub-clause 13.1 and 13.4 (Defects and remedies) o Section 5, sub-clause 14.2 (Limitation of liability) o Section 5, sub-clause 16.1 (Insurance) o Section 5, sub-clause 18.1 + 18.3 (Performance guarantee) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 25/07216-12): o Clause 2 (Requirements), except for sub-clause 2.3 o Sub-clause 4.6 (Advance payment guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 above) o Clause 9 (Time of Delivery) o Clause 11 (Intellectual property rights) o Clause 12 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Clause 13 (Defects and remedies) o Clause 14 (Limitation of liability) o Clause 15 (Product liability) o Clause 16 (Insurance) o Clause 17 (Indemnification) o Clause 18 (Performance guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 above) o Sub-Clause 20.3 (HSE requirements) o Clause 25 (Termination) These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criteria. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
Evaluation Method
These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation.
No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10.
An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criteria.
A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Gas Storage Denmark A/S
From the notice
The Contracting Authority wants to purchase high pressure pump unit for brine injection to the Water Injection Project. The high-pressure injection pump unit and auxiliary equipment is for the injection of Brine into the underground storage facilities in Stenlille. The auxiliary systems connected are essential especially due to injecting into an existing natural gas well, hence relevant legislation is to be followed. The pump system must be fully assembled as a unit be it in a box/container allowing for relevant measures for surveillance, as part of the overall delivery. The contract consists of installation, commissioning, final documentation and hand over including further inspections after the first year of operation. The contracting authority furthermore expects the tenderer to submit a prize for the additional connection high pressure pipe work on site Borevej B1, 4295 Stenlille. For further details regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documentsMain features of the procedureThe tenders submitted must be valid for a period of 6 months from the specified time limit for the submission of tenders. If the tenderer during the negotiation phase prepares and submits revised tenders, such tenders must also be valid for the period of 6 months from the specified time limit for these revised tenders.
Contact
Procurement - Aprocurement@energinet.dk- Result · PrequalificationType
- Vest- og SydsjællandLocation
- 42122200Main codeReciprocating positive-displacement pumps for liquids
- 42122100Pumps for liquids42122130Water pumps42122300Pressure boosters for liquids45232100Ancillary works for water pipelines45332000Plumbing and drain-laying work