Search
  • Search

    Purchase of two (2) 150 kV harmonic filters for onshore outdoor installation in Nordjylland

    Energinet Eltransmission A/S

    Purchase of two (2) 150 kV harmonic filters for onshore outdoor installation in Nordjylland

    1. Contract signed

      Jun 26, 12:00 AMJune 26, 2026 12:00 AM

    2. Result notice published

      Jul 31, 10:33 AMJuly 31, 2026 10:33 AM

    Brief

    Denmark: Tenders/Energinet Eltransmission A/S/Purchase of two (2) 150 kV harmonic filters for onshore outdoor installation in Nordjylland

    Awarded

    The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.

    Award
    Solution description 30% and 2 more
    Procedure
    With negotiationTwo stages
    Agreement
    Buying goods

    Brief

    Energinet Eltransmission A/S har indgået en aftale med Siemens Energy A/S om levering af to 150 kV harmoniske filtre til udendørs installation i Nordjylland. Kontrakten har en værdi på 5.000.000 EUR. Ved tildelingen blev der lagt vægt på pris (45%), løsningsbeskrivelse (30%), lydniveau (10%) og kontraktvilkår (15%). Der deltog 2 leverandører i konkurrencen.

    Elektrisk utstyr og belysning

    Result

    TED
    • Siemens Energy A/S
      Winner
    • Number of bids
      2
    • Contract value
      €5,000,000

    Custom Assessment Criteria

    • Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria

      Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender

    Will you bid?

    The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.

    Award Criteria

    • Description

      Prices must be stated in the attached Appendix 3: Tender List (ABA + KEL) (doc. no.: 23/01546-25 and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total cost (for evaluation purpose), cf. the Tender List.

      Evaluation Method

      When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the total cost (for evaluation purpose), cf. the Tender List.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      The tenderer must include: • A detailed and Technical specific solution for the tendered assignment and how Technical Specifications are fulfilled. Including a description of the chosen methods, processes, tools, and relevant spare parts. • Layout and drawings of filter solution. The tenderer should be thorough and precise when describing the solution description, as any insecurities and discrepancies may affect the evaluation. The evaluation does not include sound levels which are evaluated solely in relation to the criteria described below. The evaluation of 'Solution description' will be based on the submitted detailed and specific solution description, the scope and content and the described methods, processes and tools used. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: Tenders’ description of: • The overall technical solution for the Filter performance according to Appendix 2A Scope of Works and Technical Specifications (doc. no. 23/01546-16 and 23/01546-17). That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such. • Size – Height x Width x Depth – it will be evaluated positive if tenderer’s solutions have a small footprint within the filter yard. Furthermore, it will be evaluated positive if the design of the filter(s) is based on a low-profile solution. • FAT & SAT - it will be evaluated positive if tenderer enclose a detailed, specific, and appropriate procedure specific to this Tender • General design – It will be evaluated positive if the tenderer’s solution is project specific, simple, and robust and the tenderer can document low maintenance costs. An overall evaluation will be made of these sub-criteria (solution description). A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 2.7.1.

      Evaluation Method

      The evaluation of 'Solution description' will be based on the submitted detailed and specific solution description, the scope and content and the described methods, processes and tools used. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance:

      • The overall technical solution for the Filter performance according to Appendix 2A Scope of Works and Technical Specifications (doc. no. 23/01546-16 and 23/01546-17). That is to which extent the detailed solution description demonstrates a high level of ability to identify relevant activities and challenges and proposes appropriate and project specific methods, tools, and processes for managing such.
      • Size – Height x Width x Depth – it will be evaluated positive if tenderer’s solutions have a small footprint within the filter yard. Furthermore, it will be evaluated positive if the design of the filter(s) is based on a low-profile solution.
      • FAT & SAT - it will be evaluated positive if tenderer enclose a detailed, specific, and appropriate procedure specific to this Tender
      • General design – It will be evaluated positive if the tenderer’s solution is project specific, simple, and robust and the tenderer can document low maintenance costs.
        An overall evaluation will be made of these sub-criteria (solution description).
        A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 2.7.1.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the below should be enclosed: If the tenderer includes a list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms: • Contract Agreements (doc. no. 23/01546-9 and 23/01546-10), • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 23/01546-12), • Appendix 4 Time and Payment Schedule, (doc. no. 23/01546-27 and 23/01546-28) The tenderer must use the Clarification List (doc. no. 23/01546-11). The proposed deviations to the contractual terms must be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. The tenderer may, however, suggest explicit and well-explained deviations to the contractual terms which the Contracting Authority has identified as competitive criteria below: • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 23/01546-12) and, where relevant, same Clauses and Sub-Clauses in the Contract Agreements (doc. no. 23/01546-9 and 23/01546-10): o Clause 2 (Requirements), except for Sub-Clause 2.3 o Sub-clause 4.6 (Advance payment guarantee – except for what is stated as requirements below) o Clause 9 (Time of Delivery) o Clause 11 (Intellectual property rights) o Clause 12 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Clause 13 (Defects and remedies) o Clause 14 (Limitation of liability) o Clause 15 (Product liability) o Clause 16 (Insurance) o Clause 17 (Indemnification) o Clause 18 (Performance guarantee – except for what is stated as requirements below) o Sub-Clause 20.3 (HSE requirements) o Clause 25 (Termination) • Appendix 4: Time and Payment Schedule (doc. no. 23/01546-27 and 23/01546-28)) Regarding the Performance Guarantee (regulated in Clause 18) and the Advance Payment Guarantee (regulated in Sub-Clause 4.6): It is a requirement to issue a Performance Guarantee. It is also a requirement that the guarantees are on-demand guarantees issued by a financial institution or other authorised guarantor with a minimum rating of the investment grade level at BBB- (Standard&Poors or Fitch) or Baa3 (Moody’s). If the market is unable to offer such a rating, due to a general crisis in the market, “Seller must obtain the best possible rating the market can offer”. Finally, the wording in the guarantees regarding Disputes and Applicable law is a requirement. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 2.7.1.

      Evaluation Method

      The evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" will include any proposed deviations to the contractual terms. Any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. Deviations which intend to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation.
      No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10.
      An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
      A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 2.7.1.

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    • Description

      The evaluation of the subcriterion “Sound level” will be based upon the specifications given in section 4.1 and 9.1 in Appendix 2A Scope of Works and Technical Specifications (doc. no. 23/01546-16 and 23/01546-17). The tenderer must include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, including chosen methods, processes and tools. The evaluation of guaranteed sound level (cf. section 9. Sound Level in Appendix 2A Scope of Works and Technical Specifications (doc. no. 23/01546-16 and 23/01546-17) is performed in 3 steps: 1. Sound power level: The evaluation of guaranteed sound levels (see section 11. The sound level in Annex 2A scope of work and technical specifications (doc. nos. 23/01546-16 and 23/01546-17) is carried out in the following steps: 1. Sound power level LWA: a. If the supplier presents a solution where the guaranteed sound power level is higher than specified by the contracting authority, the guaranteed sound level is too high. The solution will get a score of 0 (zero). In addition, if the sound power level is more than 3 dB higher than required, the contracting authority reserves the right to disregard the tender as the minimum technical requirements are not met. b. If the guaranteed sound power level is equal to or lower than the maximum volume level, the score is 5 (five) c. If external methods of sound damping methods such as sound screens are used, 3 (three) points will be deducted from the score obtained in point b). d. If the sound power level is LOWER than the maximum sound power level accepted by the contracting authority: The final assessment is obtained by adding 1 (one) point to the preliminary assessment { b) + c) } for each dB that the guaranteed sound power level is lower than the maximum value required. The resulting grade cannot exceed the value of 10 (ten), so no points are given for sound levels more than 10 dB lower than the required maximum value

      Evaluation Method

      The evaluation of the subcriterion “Sound level” will be based upon the specifications given in section 4.1 and 9.1 in Appendix 2A Scope of Works and Technical Specifications (doc. no. 23/01546-16 and 23/01546-17). The tenderer must include a detailed and specific solution description for the tendered assignment, including chosen methods, processes and tools.
      The evaluation of guaranteed sound level (cf. section 9. Sound Level in Appendix 2A Scope of Works and Technical Specifications (doc. no. 23/01546-16 and 23/01546-17) is performed in 3 steps:

      1. Sound power level LWA:
        a. If the supplier presents a solution where the guaranteed sound power level is higher than specified by the contracting authority, the guaranteed sound level is too high. The solution will get a score of 0 (zero). In addition, if the sound power level is more than 3 dB higher than required, the contracting authority reserves the right to disregard the tender as the minimum technical requirements are not met.
        b. If the guaranteed sound power level is equal to or lower than the maximum volume level, the score is 5 (five)
        c. If external methods of sound damping methods such as sound screens are used, 3 (three) points will be deducted from the score obtained in point b).
        d. If the sound power level is LOWER than the maximum sound power level accepted by the contracting authority: The final assessment is obtained by adding 1 (one) point to the preliminary assessment { b) + c) } for each dB that the guaranteed sound power level is lower than the maximum value required. The resulting grade cannot exceed the value of 10 (ten), so no points are given for sound levels more than 10 dB lower than the required maximum value

      Source

      No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.

    Previous winners

    • Who are you up against?

      The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Energinet Eltransmission A/S

    From the notice

    • Purchase of two (2) 150 kV harmonic filters for onshore outdoor installation in Nordjylland

    • Contact

      Procurement - Bprocurement@energinet.dk
    • Type
      Result · Prequalification
    • Location
      Nordjylland
    • Main code
      Electric motors, generators and transformers
      31100000

    Similar active competitions

    • Energinet Eltransmission A/S

      Diverse konstruksjonsmateriell

      Re-tendering - Framework agreement: Purchase of fittings for glass insulator strings 26/17723

      Energinet Eltransmission A/S needs to purchase complete glass insulator strings through a framework agreement over 4 years, with two options for extension of 2 years each, for a total potential duration of 8 years. The maximum total value of the agreement is 30,442,953 EUR. The procurement is divided into two lots: Lot 1 for complete glass insulator strings for powerlines, with an expected consumption of 10,000,000 EUR and a maximum value of 24,000,000 EUR; and Lot 2 for complete glass insulator strings for substations, with an expected consumption of 2,684,563.75 EUR and a maximum value of 6,442,953.00 EUR. Tenders can be submitted for one or both lots. The award criteria are Quality (41.6667%), Delivery time (16.6667% + 16.6667% = 33.3334%), and Price (25%). Qualification requirements include an equity of at least 2,500,000 EUR and an equity ratio of at least 20% (or 15-20% if equity exceeds 7,500,000 EUR) for Lot 1. Additionally, applicants must provide three to five comparable and relevant references from the past five years, with at least one reference demonstrating the supply of glass insulators for a transmission network with a voltage level of at least 132 kV.

      Framework agreement with qualification
      Nov 2, 2026(3 days)
      €30,442,953

    • HOFOR Fjernvarme P/S

      Elektrisk utstyr og belysning

      SMC-6.2 Power Transformer and 132 kV Gas Insulated Switchgear

      HOFOR Fjernvarme P/S is procuring the design, manufacture, factory testing, delivery, site assembly, testing, commissioning and handover of power transformers and 132 kV SF₆-free gas-insulated switchgear for the Svanemøllen Energy Centre in Copenhagen. The procurement is divided into two lots: transformers, including cooling systems, accessories, documentation and training; and GIS, including local control cubicles, monitoring equipment, accessories, documentation and training. The maximum total contract value is EUR 10 million. The negotiated competition has prequalification followed by tendering and evaluation; up to four applicants per lot will be invited to tender, with negotiations expected. Lot 1 applicants must provide at least two completed references from the past five years for comparable or higher-rated power transformers, including factory acceptance testing and site commissioning support. Award criteria for each lot are price (45%), technical solution and project execution (15%), commercial and contractual terms (7.5%), and health and safety (5%).

      Competition with qualification
      Nov 27, 2026(28 days)
      €10,000,000

    • Energistyrelsen

      Elektrisk utstyr og belysning

      North Sea I, South, Offshore Wind Farm

      Danish Energy Agency har udbudt en koncessionsaftale for etablering og drift af havvindmølleparken "North Sea I, South" ud for Vestjylland. Projektet omfatter opførelse og drift af en havvindmøllepark med en minimumskapacitet på 1 GW, med en kontraktvarighed på 40 år og en maksimal totalværdi på 6,6 milliarder DKK ekskl. moms (2025-priser) i form af statsstøtte over 20 år. Koncessionshaveren bærer den kommercielle risiko, men vil modtage økonomisk støtte via en tovejs Contract for Difference (CfD) ordning. Tildelingskriteriet er den laveste budpris (100%). Kvalifikationskrav inkluderer mindst én reference fra et storskala offshore energiproduktionsprojekt inden for de seneste ti år, med anlægsomkostninger på minimum 500.000.000 DKK, fastgjort til havbunden på mindst 10 meters dybde, og en kontraktvarighed på minimum 25 år. Referencen skal desuden vise erfaring inden for mindst tre af følgende områder: projektledelse, engineering, indkøb, udførelse, drift eller kvalitetskontrol.

      Competition
      Oct 23, 2028(100+ days)
      DKK 6,600,000,000