Online exam proctoring system
Expired
The competition has expired without a winner being announced.
- Deadline
- Aug 26, 2024Expired
- Award
- Quality 20%
Brief
The object of the procurement is an online remote exam proctoring Software as a Service (SaaS). The procurement is carried out jointly by Laurea University of Applied Sciences (Laurea UAS) and Turku University of Applied Sciences (Turku UAS). The higher education institutions will each sign an agreement with the Service Provider selected as a result of the procurement process. The online exam proctoring system must be suitable for higher education students, and it must provide the students with the opportunity to take exams regardless of their location, for example, from home or on/off campus. The procurement includes the deployment of the software service and support and maintenance services for both organisations. The online exam proctoring system must meet the requirements set out in the invitation to tender and its annexes, especially the requirements set out in Annex 2 Requirements, and the terms and conditions of contract described in Annex A Procurement Agreement.
Custom Assessment Criteria
Get answers to your bid/no-bid criteria
Set them up once and Cobrief answers them in every tender
Will you bid?
The agent sets up the bid and writes the first draft. Free for 14 days.
Qualification requirements
Description
The tenderer shall have sufficient economic and financial standing about the size and quality of the procurement. The tenderer's financial standing is primarily evaluated based on credit reports in the service provider Dun & Bradstreet (D&B), which shall indicate a risk rating score of 1 to 3. If the tenderer's information is not stated in the service provided by D&B, the economic and financial standing of the tenderer will be evaluated based on financial statements and/or other similar information. These accounts will be separately requested from the tenderer if they are required. These accounts include for example income statement, balance sheet, annual report and other financial statements, if their publication is required by the laws of the tenderer's country of establishment. The tenderer whose Risk Indicator of D&B is 4 or the tenderer whose economical standing and financial solvency is estimated to correspond to the D&B's Risk Indicator 4 will be excluded from the procurement procedure. If the tender is submitted as a group, all the members of the group shall meet this requirement individually. If the tenderer uses the resources of other entities, all the entities shall meet this requirement individually.
Documentation Requirement
The tenderer's financial standing is primarily evaluated based on credit reports in the service provider Dun & Bradstreet (D&B), which shall indicate a risk rating score of 1 to 3. If the tenderer's information is not stated in the service provided by D&B, the economic and financial standing of the tenderer will be evaluated based on financial statements and/or other similar information. These accounts will be separately requested from the tenderer if they are required. These accounts include for example income statement, balance sheet, annual report and other financial statements, if their publication is required by the laws of the tenderer's country of establishment.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
It is enrolled in relevant professional registers kept in the Member State of its establishment as described in Annex XI of Directive 20104/24/EU; economic operators from certain Member States may have to comply with other requirements se out in that Annex.
Documentation Requirement
It is enrolled in relevant professional registers kept in the Member State of its establishment as described in Annex XI of Directive 20104/24/EU; economic operators from certain Member States may have to comply with other requirements se out in that Annex.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Description
Requirement for technical and professional ability is stated in the annex "References". If a tender is made by a group of economic operators, the members of that group can meet the requirements jointly. If the tenderer relies on the resources of other entities (resource entities) to meet the requirements, it can do so jointly with those entities. In this case, the tenderer may be asked for clarification of the existence of commitments and contracts relating to the resource entities. The resources associated with the experience of other entities can be used only if the other entities concerned perform the services or some of the services to be acquired.
Documentation Requirement
Requirement for technical and professional ability is stated in the annex "References".
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the requirement against the tender documents.
Award Criteria
Description
The tenderer may indicate the prices of the system in Annex 6 "Prices". For price comparisons, the total comparison price of the Annex 6 "Prices" is used. The total comparison price is calculated as described in cell F43 in Annex 6 "Prices".
Evaluation Method
The total comparison price of the tenderer is converted into points. For example, the lowest total comparison price is EUR 1000 and the second tender is EUR 1300. The tenderer with the lowest tender will receive full 80 points and the second tender will receive 1000/1300*80 = 61,54 points.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Description
The quality criteria and their scores are indicated in the Annex 2 "Requirements" of the Invitation to tender. A tenderer may receive a maximum of weighted 20 quality points for the comparison from the additional quality criteria considered as an advantage. The amount of points that each of the quality criteria is worth, is informed for each criterion in question (Annex 2 Requirements, column I). The total number of these points is 109.
Evaluation Method
A Tenderer receives the final quality points (max 20) for the comparison according to the following formula: The tenderer's total number of points divided by the highest possible amount of points multiplied by the maximum number of quality points 20. For example, the tenderer gets 99 points. According to the formula, the tender gets 99/109 * 20 = 18,17 weighted quality points.
Source
No source found in the documents. Check the weight against the tender documents.
Previous winners
Who are you up against?
The suppliers who have won similar contracts at Laurea-ammattikorkeakoulu Oy
From the notice
The object of the procurement is an online remote exam proctoring Software as a Service (SaaS). The procurement is carried out jointly by Laurea University of Applied Sciences (Laurea UAS) and Turku University of Applied Sciences (Turku UAS). The higher education institutions will each sign an agreement with the Service Provider selected as a result of the procurement process. The online exam proctoring system must be suitable for higher education students, and it must provide the students with the opportunity to take exams regardless of their location, for example, from home or on/off campus. The procurement includes the deployment of the software service and support and maintenance services for both organisations. The online exam proctoring system must meet the requirements set out in the invitation to tender and its annexes, especially the requirements set out in Annex 2 Requirements, and the terms and conditions of contract described in Annex A Procurement Agreement.Main features of the procedureIf the tenderer has different online proctoring systems, the tenderer can make parallel offers based on different systems
Contact
Hansel Oykilpailutus@hansel.fi- CompetitionType
- 48000000Main codeSoftware package and information systems
- 72000000IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support