Search
  • Search

    Retendering Framework Agreement concerning THT Gas Chromatograph

    Energinet Gastransmission A/S

    Retendering Framework Agreement concerning THT Gas Chromatograph

    1. Competition notice published

      Jul 15, 2025 5:08 AMJuly 15, 2025 5:08 AM

    2. Contract signed

      Sep 7, 12:00 AMSeptember 7, 2026 12:00 AM

    3. Result notice published

      Sep 7, 11:56 AMSeptember 7, 2026 11:56 AM

    Brief

    Denmark: Tenders/Energinet Gastransmission A/S/Retendering Framework Agreement concerning THT Gas Chromatograph

    Awarded

    The competition has ended and a winner has been selected.

    Brief

    Gasskromatografi og analyseinstrumenter

    Energinet Gastransmission A/S has entered into a framework agreement with Emerson Automation Solutions for the delivery of systems to measure THT (Tetrahydrothiophene) in natural gas, including engineering, manufacturing, testing, commissioning, and installation. The agreement has a duration of 4 years with options for 2+2 years, and an estimated total value of 5,000,000 EUR, with a maximum total value of 7,000,000 EUR. The buyer expects to purchase 12 instrument packages for THT Gas Chromatograph in total. The initial call-off will be for 1 instrument package. Specific requirements included detailed technical solutions for instrument packages, programming and configuration, gas sampling and conditioning systems, and data connection and storage, with emphasis on independent testing, clear configuration, optimized sampling systems, and standard data connection protocols. Cyber security requirements were also a significant factor. Five bids were received for this contract.

    Result

    Winner
    Emerson Automation Solutions
    Number of bids
    5
    Contract value
    Not stated
    Maximum framework agreement value
    Up to €7,000,000

    About the bid

      Through the establishment of the tendered framework agreement, the Contracting Authority wants to purchase systems for measuring THT (Tetrahydrothiophene) in natural gas. The Supplier’s scope of supply includes engineering, manufacturing, testing, commissioning and installation. For further details regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. The value of the framework agreement is expected to amount to EUR 5.000.000. The estimated consumption during the term of the framework is expected to amount to 12 (twelve) instrument packages for THT Gas Chromatograph in total. The tendered framework agreement has a duration of 4 years. The framework agreement can be extended for 2x2 years. Orders under the framework agreement will be allocated directly to the supplier which, in the view of the Contracting Authority, has submitted the most economically advantageous tender, see section 4.1. The framework agreement consists of an initial call-off of 1 (one) instrument package. The initial call-off will be awarded on the basis of the award of the framework agreement to the tenderer that achieves the highest score, cf. section 4.1. The consumption figures are estimates only and are consequently not binding for the Contracting Authority. During the specified period, the Contracting Authority has the right to purchase the services and/or goods comprised by the framework agreement from the selected tenderer, but is not obligated to do so, cf. the framework agreement section 1.3.Main features of the procedureThe tenders submitted must be valid for a period of 3 months as from the specified time limit for the sub-mission of tenders. If the tenderer during the negotiation phase, prepares and submits revised tenders, such tenders must also be valid for the period of 3 months from the specified time limit for these revised tenders.

      Contact name
      Procurement - K
      Contact phone
      +45 70102244
      Contact email
      procurement@energinet.dk
      Address
      Tonne Kjærsvej 65, 7000 Fredericia

    Custom Assessment Criteria

    Start a free trial to ask your own questions about the tender and get AI-generated answers.

    Award Criteria

    • Description

      Prices must be stated in Appendix 3: Schedule of Prices (doc.no. 25/11405-14) and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in EUR. When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the grand total price for evaluation, cf. the Schedule of Prices (doc.no. 25/11405-14). The tenderer must fill out all yellow cells in Appendix 3: Schedule of Prices in order to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

      Evaluation Method

      When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the grand total price for evaluation, cf. the Schedule of Prices (doc.no. 25/11405-14).

    • Description

      The tenderer must include a completed appendix 2.5: Solution description (doc.no. 25/11405-13) which demonstrates the level of fulfillment of the specifications requested by the Contracting Authority, including any deviations in the proposed solution. Furthermore, the tenderer must include a detailed description of the tendered solution regarding the main elements and especially the tenderer should document: a) Instrument packages • Drift/accuracy/repeatability evaluation • Certificates of international standards and third parties • Performance evaluation rapports from third party testing laboratories for offered in-struments • Description of Calibration b) Programming and configuration • Images showing the programming/configuration software screens with an explanation of the basic functions of each icon/menu • A printable report of the parameterizations/configurations to the instrument • Programming documentation with comments/explanations c) Gas Sampling and Conditioning System • A sample system sketch and lag-time calculation adapted to these measures, showing volumes of all filters, t-branched and tubes d) Data connection and data storage • A description of data connection and data storage The tenderer must use the Clarification List (doc.no. 25/11405-19). The proposed deviations to the technical solution must be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Technical clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. In the evaluation of “Technical solution”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the extent to which the tenderer complies with appendix 2: Scope of Work (doc.no. 25/11405-8), including the scope and content of any deviations in relation thereto. Any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: a) Instrument packages • It will be evaluated positively if the THT Gas Chromatograph is tested by an independent testing organization and that the accredited calibration certificate is traceable to international standards. • It will be evaluated positively if the THT Gas Chromatograph can both be automatically calibrated and perform manually selected calibration. b) Programming and configuration • It will be evaluated positively if the configuration of the THT Gas Chromatograph is clear and logically structured e.g., a software interface with grouped settings and clearly labeled menus for easy navigation. c) Gas Sampling and Conditioning System • It will be evaluated positively if the location of the pressure reduction points is close to the sampling point, to minimize gas transport time. • It will be evaluated positively if the offered solution designs the sampling system without T-branches, dead ends, or oversized filters, to minimize gas transport time. d) Data connection • It will be evaluated positively if the data connection and communication of the THT Gas Chromatograph can be adapted to the systems of the Contracting Authority, e.g., the data connection uses standard Modbus over TCP/IP, and the data and alarms are accessible to the Contracting Authority’s network and SCADA-system. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

      Evaluation Method

      In the evaluation of “Technical solution”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the extent to which the tenderer complies with appendix 2: Scope of Work (doc.no. 25/11405-8), including the scope and content of any deviations in relation thereto. Any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance:

      a) Instrument packages

      • It will be evaluated positively if the THT Gas Chromatograph is tested by an independent testing organization and that the accredited calibration certificate is traceable to international standards.
      • It will be evaluated positively if the THT Gas Chromatograph can both be automatically calibrated and perform manually selected calibration.

      b) Programming and configuration

      • It will be evaluated positively if the configuration of the THT Gas Chromatograph is clear and logically structured e.g., a software interface with grouped settings and clearly labeled menus for easy navigation.

      c) Gas Sampling and Conditioning System

      • It will be evaluated positively if the location of the pressure reduction points is close to the sampling point, to minimize gas transport time.
      • It will be evaluated positively if the offered solution designs the sampling system without T-branches, dead ends, or oversized filters, to minimize gas transport time.

      d) Data connection

      • It will be evaluated positively if the data connection and communication of the THT Gas Chromatograph can be adapted to the systems of the Contracting Authority, e.g., the data connection uses standard Modbus over TCP/IP, and the data and alarms are accessible to the Contracting Authority’s network and SCADA-system.

      An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.

      It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

    • Description

      The tenderer must include a completed Appendix 2.4: Cyber Security Requirements for components (doc.no. 25/11405-12) which documents the tenderer’s fulfillment of the Contracting authority’s Cyber Security requirements, including any deviations in the proposed solution. The tenderer should be thorough and precise when describing the solution, as any deviations from the Cyber Security Requirements must be specified in Appendix 2.4 and explained in detail. In the evaluation of “Cyber Security”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the extent to which the tenderer complies with Appendix 2.4: Cyber Security Requirements for components (doc.no. 25/11405-12). All deviations will be included in the evaluation, and any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on its clarity, content, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations to access control and logging requirements are of particular significance in the evaluation. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

      Evaluation Method

      In the evaluation of “Cyber Security”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the extent to which the tenderer complies with Appendix 2.4: Cyber Security Requirements for components (doc.no. 25/11405-12).

      All deviations will be included in the evaluation, and any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on its clarity, content, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations to access control and logging requirements are of particular significance in the evaluation.

      An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.

      It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

    • Description

      As part of the evaluation the tenderer must state the total sample gas usage of the THT Gas Chromatograph and sample system in cc/min. The tenderer must include the calculation of the total sample gas usage. The calculation must be based on a case comprising a single sampling point with a cabinet that has a 15-meter sample line between the THT Gas Chromatograph and the sampling location. The evaluation of the sub-criterion “Emissions” will be based on the stated total sample gas usage as offered by the tenderer. A total sample gas usage of the THT Gas Chromatograph and sample system of 500 cc/min or under will result in a score of 10, whereas a total sample gas usage of 1000 cc/min or over will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation.

      Evaluation Method

      The evaluation of the sub-criterion “Emissions” will be based on the stated total sample gas usage as offered by the tenderer.

      A total sample gas usage of the THT Gas Chromatograph and sample system of 500 cc/min or under will result in a score of 10, whereas a total sample gas usage of 1000 cc/min or over will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation.

    • Description

      The tenderer must state the maximum guaranteed delivery time from Signing of specific Agreement under Framework Agreement till Acceptance of all documentation (milestone 1 to 6). The delivery time must be stated in appendix 4: Time and Payment Schedule (doc. no. 25/11405-15). It should be noted the guaranteed delivery time stated by the tenderer will be penalized in the contract, cf. General Terms and Conditions (doc.no. 25/11405-5), section 15. The evaluation of the sub-criterion “Delivery time” will be based on the stated delivery time from Signing of specific Agreement under Framework Agreement till Delivery to delivery place (milestone 1 to 3) as offered by the tenderer. A delivery time of 32 weeks or under will result in a score of 10, whereas a delivery time of 45 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation. An offered delivery time (from milestone 1 to 3) above 65 weeks will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

      Evaluation Method

      The evaluation of the sub-criterion “Delivery time” will be based on the stated delivery time from Signing of specific Agreement under Framework Agreement till Delivery to delivery place (milestone 1 to 3) as offered by the tenderer.

      A delivery time of 32 weeks or under will result in a score of 10, whereas a delivery time of 45 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation.

      An offered delivery time (from milestone 1 to 3) above 65 weeks will not be accepted and will result in the tender being considered as non-compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

    • Description

      Tenderer can include a list of proposed deviations to the attached contract terms. The contract terms are defined as below: • Framework Agreement (doc.no. 25/11405-6), • Agreement under the Framework Agreement (doc.no. 25/11405-7), • General Terms & Conditions for Works (doc.no. 25/11405-5), The tenderer must use the Clarification List (doc.no. 25/11405-19). The proposed deviations to the contract terms must be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. With the exception of the above-mentioned clauses and sections in sub-section 3.7.1 in this document, which are not part of the evaluation of 'Contract terms', it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion 'Contract terms' and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion. It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

      Evaluation Method

      The proposed deviations to the contract terms must be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. With the exception of the above-mentioned clauses and sections in sub-section 3.7.1 in this document, which are not part of the evaluation of 'Contract terms', it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations.

      These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion 'Contract terms' and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10.

      An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.

      It is a minimum requirement that the tenderers reach a minimum score of 4 for the tender to be compliant, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 in this document.

    Qualification requirements

    • Description

      Egenkapital fra siste årsrapport må, på tidspunktet for prekvalifisering, være minst 375 000 EUR.

      Documentation Requirement

      Søkeren må bekrefte økonomisk evne i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapital (total egenkapital inkl. aksjekapital, reserver, revaluering, tilbakeholdt fortjeneste osv.). Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til en eller flere enheter (f.eks. et tilknyttet selskap eller en underleverandør) eller søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører (f.eks. et konsortium), må informasjonen for ESPD del IV.B også gis i en separat ESPD fra hver av disse enhetene. I denne sammenhengen vil det være tilstrekkelig at en av enhetene oppfyller de nødvendige standardene isolert, eller at søkeren, inkludert kapasiteten til andre enheter, eller en gruppe økonomiske aktører oppfyller det i fellesskap.

    • Description

      Egenkapitalandelen fra siste årsrapport må, på tidspunktet for prekvalifisering, være minst 20 %. Hvis egenkapitalandelen er mellom 15 % og 20 %, kan søkeren kvalifisere dersom egenkapitalen overstiger 1 100 000 EUR.

      Documentation Requirement

      Søkeren må bekrefte økonomisk evne i ESPD del IV.B med informasjon fra siste årsrapport angående egenkapitalandel (egenkapital/totale eiendeler), oppgitt med to desimaler. Hvis søkeren baserer seg på kapasiteten til en eller flere enheter (f.eks. et tilknyttet selskap eller en underleverandør) eller søkeren er en gruppe økonomiske aktører (f.eks. et konsortium), må informasjonen for ESPD del IV.B også gis i en separat ESPD fra hver av disse enhetene. I denne sammenhengen vil det være tilstrekkelig at en av enhetene oppfyller de nødvendige standardene isolert, eller at søkeren, inkludert kapasiteten til andre enheter, eller en gruppe økonomiske aktører oppfyller det i fellesskap.

    Previous Contract Winners

    Start a free trial to see who has won similar tenders for this buyer.

    See the full notice

    Contracting authority
    Energinet Gastransmission A/S
    Title
    Retendering Framework Agreement concerning THT Gas Chromatograph
    Type
    ResultFramework agreementPrequalification
    Main code
    38432210Gas chromatographs
    Supplemental codes
    38432100Gas-analysis apparatus38545000Gas-testing kits39340000Gas network equipment39341000Gas pressure equipment51210000Installation services of measuring equipment
    Estimated value
    €7,000,000.00
    Duration
    4 years

    Active similar competitions

    • EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG

      Rock Dumping Services

      1. Introduction The Scope of Work (SoW) defines the requirements, methodologies, and deliverables for the provision of Rock Dumping Services, including the design, supply, installation, and verification of rock berms for the protection and stabilization of subsea cables, CPS, Foundations, and related offshore infrastructure. The services are to be executed at the designated offshore wind farm locations in the German North Sea sector, Baltic Sea Sector or any other european offshore wind farm location. 2. Objectives Protection of Subsea Assets: To protect subsea cables, cable protection systems (CPS), and foundations from environmental and operational risks, such as scouring, freespan, and mechanical damage. Stabilization: To ensure long-term stability and integrity of subsea infrastructure by installing engineered rock berms. Compliance: To execute all works in accordance with applicable international standards, project specifications, and client requirements. 3. Scope of Work 3.1 General Description The Contractor shall provide a complete service package, including but not limited to: Project management and engineering Design of rock berms and stabilization measures Procurement and supply of rock material Mobilization and demobilization of specialized vessels and equipment Execution of rock installation works Pre- and post-installation surveys Quality assurance and as-built documentation. 3.2 Project Engineering & Management Project Planning: Develop detailed project schedules, installation plans, and risk assessments. Design Services: Prepare or review CPS berm designs, including cross-sections, material specifications, and installation tolerances. The Contractor may advise on optimal design solutions from an operational perspective. Quality Management: Implement a project-specific Quality Management System (QMS) in line with ISO 9001:2015, ensuring all works meet client and regulatory standards. HSE Management: Develop and enforce a Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) plan, including job hazard analysis, toolbox talks, and stop-work authority for all personnel. 3.3 Design Requirements Example (will be defined case by case by specific project): Berm Geometry: Typical berm dimensions may include heights of ~1.1 m, widths of ~0.3 m, and slopes of 1:3, subject to project-specific requirements. Material Specification: Use freshly crushed rock, grading CP 45/180 or as specified, with a specific density of ~2.65 t/m³ and bulk density of ~1.56 t/m³. All rock must comply with EN 13383-1,2 standards. Tolerances: Vertical tolerance: -0.00/+0.50 m; Horizontal tolerance: -0.00/+2.00 m either side. Tolerances are to be verified by survey. Losses and Settlement: Account for installation losses (e.g., soil penetration, settlement, wash-away, compaction) in the design and quantity calculations. Execution Accuracy: Capable of precise berm installation according to design profile; Vertical Installation Tolerance -0,00/+0,50m 3.4 Mobilization & Demobilization Mobilization: Prepare and mobilize the designated rock installation vessel(s) at the port of origin. Calibrate and test all positioning, survey, and installation equipment prior to departure. Demobilization: Upon completion, demobilize all equipment and personnel, ensuring the site is left in a safe and compliant condition. 3.5 Rock Installation Operations 3.5.1 Equipment Vessels: Use dynamically positioned fall pipe vessels (DPFPV) or equivalent. Fall Pipe Systems: Deploy central and/or inclined fall pipe systems, equipped with ROVs for precise placement and monitoring. Inclined systems are used for close proximity to structures. Survey Systems: Utilize DGNSS, USBL, multibeam echosounders (MBE), and online 3D visualization packages for real-time monitoring and documentation. Vessel Requirement: Minimum DP2 fall pipe vessel 3.5.2 Sequence of Work Procurement of Rock Material: Source and stockpile rock at the designated quarry, ensuring compliance with design specifications and timely supply. Loading Operations: Load rock onto the vessel using conveyor belts or harbor cranes, with quantities verified by draft survey. Transit to Site: Sail to the offshore site, maintaining communication with client representatives. Pre-Installation Survey: Conduct detailed bathymetric and positioning surveys to establish the as-found condition of the seabed and infrastructure. Rock Placement: Execute rock dumping using DPFPV in auto-track mode, adjusting vessel speed and feeder output to achieve the required berm profile. Use ROVs and real-time monitoring tools to ensure accuracy. Intermediate Surveys: Perform check surveys during installation to monitor progress and adjust methodology as needed. Post-Installation Survey: Conduct final surveys to verify that the installed berm meets design specifications. Demobilization: Recover all equipment and return to port. 3.5.3 Special Operations Close Proximity Works: For rock placement near structures, use inclined fall pipe or tremie pipe systems, with standoff distances and positioning monitored by echo sounders and sonar. Remedial Works: If required, perform additional passes or remedial installations based on survey results. 3.6 Survey and Documentation Survey Deliverables: Provide as-built charts (DWG, PDF), DTM ASCII files, and comprehensive as-built reports. All data must be corrected for tide and quality-checked before submission. Acceptance: Survey data and as-built documentation are to be reviewed and accepted by the client’s offshore representative before demobilization. The exact requirements will be specified by the specific case and project. ___ All companies affiliated with EnBW within the meaning of Sections 15 et seq. of the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) shall be entitled to place orders.

      Qualification systemNov 18, 2025
      Dec 16, 2028(100+ days)

    • Energinet Eltransmission A/S

      Diverse konstruksjonsmateriell

      Re-tendering - Framework agreement: Purchase of fittings for glass insulator strings 26/17723

      Energinet Eltransmission A/S needs to purchase complete glass insulator strings through a framework agreement over 4 years, with two options for extension of 2 years each, for a total potential duration of 8 years. The maximum total value of the agreement is 30,442,953 EUR. The procurement is divided into two lots: Lot 1 for complete glass insulator strings for powerlines, with an expected consumption of 10,000,000 EUR and a maximum value of 24,000,000 EUR; and Lot 2 for complete glass insulator strings for substations, with an expected consumption of 2,684,563.75 EUR and a maximum value of 6,442,953.00 EUR. Tenders can be submitted for one or both lots. The award criteria are Quality (41.6667%), Delivery time (16.6667% + 16.6667% = 33.3334%), and Price (25%). Qualification requirements include an equity of at least 2,500,000 EUR and an equity ratio of at least 20% (or 15-20% if equity exceeds 7,500,000 EUR) for Lot 1. Additionally, applicants must provide three to five comparable and relevant references from the past five years, with at least one reference demonstrating the supply of glass insulators for a transmission network with a voltage level of at least 132 kV.

      Framework agreement with qualificationOct 2, 2026
      Nov 2, 2026(4 days)
      €30,442,953

    • Verbandsgemeinde Bad Breisig

      Rådgivende ingeniørtjenester for bygg og anlegg

      VG Bad Breisig - Errichtung eines Feuerwehrgerätehauses in der Ortsgemeinde Waldorf, Los 2: Planungs- und Überwachungsleistungen der Fachplanung Technische Ausrüstung HLS und Elektro

      Die Verbandsgemeinde Bad Breisig benötigt Planungs- und Überwachungsleistungen der Fachplanung Technische Ausrüstung (Heizung, Lüftung, Sanitär und Elektro) für den Neubau eines Feuerwehrgerätehauses in der Ortsgemeinde Waldorf, Ahrweiler. Das Feuerwehrgerätehaus ist als kombinierte Anlage aus Fahrzeughalle, Betriebshof, Sozial- und Funktionsbereichen sowie Freianlagen geplant und muss für eine Personalstärke von 55-75 aktiven Mitgliedern und ca. 20 Jugendfeuerwehrmitgliedern ausgelegt sein, unter Beachtung der DIN 14092. Die Vergabe erfolgt in einem zweiphasigen Verfahren, bei dem 3-5 der am besten geeigneten Bewerber zur Angebotsabgabe aufgefordert werden. Die Zuschlagskriterien sind Preis (35 %), Besonderheiten bei der Planung eines Feuerwehrgerätehauses (20 %), Qualitäts-, Termin- und Kostenmanagement (20 %), Intensität der Bauüberwachung und Baubetreuung (20 %) und Akzeptanz des Vertrages hinsichtlich nicht preislicher Bedingungen (5 %). Qualifikationsanforderungen umfassen mindestens eine Referenz für Planungsleistungen, Berufserfahrung des Projektleiters und des stellvertretenden Projektleiters (mindestens 3 Jahre für den stellvertretenden Projektleiter), ein Projektteam HLS und Elektro mit jeweils mindestens zwei Personen (Projektleitung und Stellvertretung), wobei der Projektleiter HLS Ingenieur der Versorgungstechnik und der Projektleiter Elektro Ingenieur der Elektrotechnik sein muss, sowie eine Berufshaftpflichtversicherung mit einer Deckungssumme von mindestens 1,0 Mio. EUR für Personen-, Sach- und Vermögensschäden.

      Competition with qualificationOct 7, 2026
      Nov 9, 2026(11 days)

    • Verbandsgemeinde Bernkastel-Kues

      Rådgivende ingeniørtjenester for bygg og anlegg

      VG Bernkastel-Kues - Sanierung des Bürger- und Feuerwehrgerätehauses: Los 2 - Planungsleistungen der Technischen Ausrüstung HLS und Elektro

      Die Verbandsgemeinde Bernkastel-Kues benötigt Planungsleistungen für die technische Ausrüstung (Heizung, Lüftung, Sanitär und Elektro) zur Sanierung und zum Umbau des Bürger- und Feuerwehrgerätehauses in Brauneberg, Deutschland. Das Projekt umfasst eine umfassende bauliche, energetische, technische und funktionale Sanierung des zweigeschossigen Bestandsgebäudes, wobei das Bürgerhaus im Obergeschoss barrierefrei umgebaut und das Feuerwehrhaus im Erdgeschoss nach heutigen Standards saniert werden soll. Die Vergabe erfolgt in mehreren Phasen, wobei 3-5 geeignete Bewerber zur Angebotsabgabe aufgefordert werden und Verhandlungen stattfinden können. Die Zuschlagskriterien sind Preis (50 %), Qualität der Kosten- und Terminsicherung (20 %), Intensität der Bauüberwachung (25 %) und Akzeptanz der nicht-preislichen Vertragsbedingungen (5 %). Als Qualifikationsanforderungen sind mindestens 4 Referenzen über Planungsleistungen der technischen Ausrüstung (jeweils 2 für TGA HLS und 2 für TGA Elektro) für Sanierungen/Umbauten vergleichbarer Gebäude, bei denen Planungsleistungen mindestens der Leistungsphasen 2-5 und 8 erbracht wurden und die weitgehend nach dem 01.01.2020 fertiggestellt wurden, nachzuweisen. Zudem muss das Büro über einen Projektleiter und mindestens einen qualifizierten Stellvertreter mit akademischer Qualifikation als Ingenieur verfügen und eine Berufshaftpflichtversicherung mit einer Deckungssumme von mindestens 1 Mio. EUR für Personen- sowie Sach- und Vermögensschäden vorweisen.

      Competition with qualificationOct 21, 2026
      Nov 11, 2026(13 days)

    • Verbandsgemeinde Bernkastel-Kues

      Arkitekttjenester

      VG Bernkastel-Kues - Sanierung des Bürger- und Feuerwehrgerätehauses: Los 1 - Leistungen der Objektplanung Gebäude und Freianlagen

      Die Verbandsgemeinde Bernkastel-Kues benötigt Dienstleistungen für die Objektplanung von Gebäuden und Freianlagen zur Sanierung und zum Umbau des Bürger- und Feuerwehrgerätehauses in Brauneberg. Das Projekt umfasst eine umfassende bauliche, energetische, technische und funktionale Sanierung des Bestandsgebäudes, wobei das Bürgerhaus im Obergeschoss barrierefrei umgebaut und das Feuerwehrhaus im Erdgeschoss nach heutigen Standards saniert werden soll. Die Leistungen sollen in Bernkastel-Wittlich erbracht werden. Die Vergabe erfolgt in einem zweistufigen Verfahren, bei dem in der ersten Phase die Eignung der Bieter geprüft wird und 3-5 der am besten geeigneten Bewerber zur Angebotsabgabe aufgefordert werden. Die Angebote können in einer oder mehreren Runden verhandelt werden. Die Zuschlagskriterien sind Preis (40 %), systematische Herangehensweise an die Planungsaufgabe und Umgang mit Schnittstellen zwischen Bürgerhaus und Feuerwehrgerätehaus (15 %), Qualitätsmanagement während der Planung und Bauphase (15 %), Intensität der Bauüberwachung und -betreuung (25 %) sowie Akzeptanz des Vertrages hinsichtlich der nicht preislichen Bedingungen (5 %). Qualifikationsanforderungen umfassen mindestens 3 Referenzen, davon mindestens 1 Referenzobjekt über Sanierung/Umbau von Feuerwehrgerätehäusern oder vergleichbaren Gebäuden und mindestens 2 Referenzobjekte über Sanierung/Umbau von Bürgerhäusern oder vergleichbaren Gebäuden mit öffentlicher Nutzung, wobei die anrechenbaren Kosten der KG 300+400 nach DIN 276 mindestens 1 Mio. EUR netto betragen müssen und die Referenzobjekte nach dem 01.01.2021 weitgehend fertiggestellt sein müssen. Zudem muss der Bewerber über eine Berufshaftpflichtversicherung mit einer Deckungssumme von mindestens 2 Mio. EUR für Personen- sowie Sach- und Vermögensschäden verfügen.

      Competition with qualificationOct 21, 2026
      Nov 11, 2026(13 days)