About the bid

Assignment description

Feladat Dabas város szennyvízelvezető és tisztító rendszerének fejlesztése vállalkozási szerződés keretében, s minimum 6 hónapos próbaüzem lefolytatása, a jótállási időtartam alatt a jótállás körébe tartozó feladatok ellátása. A létesítendő szennyvíztisztító telep és hálózatfejlesztés kiviteli tervei a KEHOP-2.1.3-15-2022-00105 támogatási szerződés keretében elkészültek, ezért a FIDIC „Piros” Könyv szerinti szerződési konstrukció kerül alkalmazásra. A teljes beruházásra előzetes vizsgálati eljárás volt szükséges, mely határozattal zárult (PE/KTHF/00172-15/2024. - környezeti hatásvizsgálat lefolytatása nem szükséges). 1. RÉSZ: Szennyvíztisztító telep és nyárfás öntözőtelep építése, hálózat építési feladatok a.) Szennyvíztisztító telep építése: Az új telep Dabas külterületén, a 0148/5-8 hrsz-ú telken új, zöldmezős beruházásként épül meg. A tervezett új szennyvíztisztító telep Dabas város szennyvizét kezeli, szervesanyag kapacitása 30.670 LEÉ, tisztítókapacitása 3100 m3/nap A tervezési területen több különféle műtárgy, épület, technológiai létesítmény készül. Az új telepen SBR üzemű szennyvíztisztítási technológia kerül alkalmazásra. b.) Nyárfás öntözőtelep létesítése, felújítása Az új nyárfás öntözőtelep tartozik, mely a tisztított szennyvíz végleges elhelyezését biztosítja. A tervdokumentáció tisztított szennyvíz gerinc-csatornát, nyomottvezetéket, nyárfás bakhátakat, öntöző tálcákat, drénvezetékeket és megkerülő ágat tartalmaz. A meglévő 21,5 ha nyárfás terület mellé további 27,5 ha-on létesül nyárfás szennyvízöntöző. Az új szikkasztók kialakítása mellett a jelenlegi, erősen degradált tálcák helyreállítása ütemezetten megtörténik. c.) Csatornahálózat és aknák építése (1. és 2. sz. kormányzóaknáktól a szennyvíztisztító telepig) (Próbaüzemmel nem érintett) E munkarészben alapvető feladat a jelenleg üzemelő 4 db gyűjtő nyomott vezetéken érkező szennyvízmennyiség továbbításának megoldása a létesítendő új szennyvíztisztító telep irányába. Ennek keretében megépülnek a következő csatornaszakaszok: az új végátemelő aknák, a jelenlegi gyűjtő vezetékeket (vízkormányzó aknák) összekötő nyomottrendszerű csatornaszakaszok, az új végátemelő aknákat és a tervezett új szennyvíztisztító telepet összekötő nyomott üzemű gyűjtő gerincvezetékek (ikervezeték). A tervek magukban foglalják a tervezett szennyvíztisztító telep hálózati ivóvíz ellátását biztosító ivóvíz vezeték megépítését is. 2. RÉSZ: Szennyvízhálózat fejlesztése a városban (Próbaüzemmel nem érintett) Ez a munkarész önállóan kivitelezhető az 1. résztől műszakilag elkülönítve. Mely egyrészt az Örkényi út és környezetének szennyvízhálózat bővítését tartalmazza („Dabas város új szennyvíztisztító telep és kapcsolódó létesítmények tervezése, Dabas város új szennyvíztisztító telepéhez kapcsolódó szennyvízhálózat-fejlesztés tervezése, Dabas város Örkényi út és környéke szennyvízhálózat fejlesztés tervezés - kiviteli terv, Munkaszám: 2024/T90” – „Örkényi út szennyvízhálózat” nevű mappa). Gravitációs és nyomott üzemű vezetékszakaszok épülnek az Örkényi úton és a Szőlő, Akácos, Rabárerdő, Venyige, Fenyves utcákban, átemelőaknákkal és kapcsolódó létesítményeikkel. Ellátandó lakóingatlanok száma jelenleg: 254 ingatlan. Gravitációs csatornahálózat és nyomóvezetékek összesen: 5 046 m. Építendő hálózati szakaszok: E-Cs 16-0-0 gravitációs csatorna (Örkényi út): 1503 m – DN200 – KG-PVC E-Cs 17-0-0 gravitációs csatorna (Szőlő utca): 974 m – DN200 – KG-PVC E-Cs 18-0-0 gravitációs csatorna (Rabárerdő utca I.): 501 m – DN200 – KG-PVC E-Cs 19-0-0 gravitációs csatorna (Rabárerdő utca II.): 335 m – DN200 – KG-PVC E-Cs 20-1-0 gravitációs csatorna (Fenyves utca, Akácos utca): 628 m – DN200 – KG-PVC E-Cs 20-2-0 gravitációs csatorna (Rabár erdő utca): 153 m – DN200 – KG-PVC E-Cs 21-0-0 gravitációs csatorna (Rabár erdő utca): 278 m – DN200 – KG-PVC E-Cs 22-0-0 gravitációs csatorna (Fenyves utca): 344 m – DN200 – KG-PVC E-Ny 4-0-0 nyomóvezeték (Rabár erdő utca): 41 m – D110 PE E-Ny 5-0-0 nyomóvezeték (Fenyves utca): 289 m – D90 PE Építendő szennyvíz átemelők: E-II. sz. átemelő, E-III. sz. átemelő Másrészt a 2. részben a városi szennyvíz hálózatra vonatkozó tervdokumentációból („Dabas város új szennyvíztisztító telep és kapcsolódó létesítmények tervezése, Dabas város új szennyvíztisztító telepéhez kapcsolódó szennyvízhálózat-fejlesztés tervezése - kiviteli terv, VERZIÓSZÁM: V2, Munkaszám: 2023/T/59” – „Városi szennyvíz hálózat” nevű mappa) az alábbi műszaki egységekre kell ajánlatot tenni: CS-1, CS-2, CS-3, CS-4, CS-5, NY-1, NY-2, E-NY 1-0-0, E-NY 2-0-0, E-NY 3-0-0, CS-NY-1, CS-NY-2, CS-NY-3, CS-NY-4, CS-NY-5, CS-NY-6, E-CS 20-0-0 vezetékek, Homok utcai átemelő, E-I. sz. átemelő, 3545/2 Hrsz-ú átemelő (Az „Áttekintő helyszínrajz – részajánlat bontáshoz” c. rajzon kék színnel jelölt tervezési területek) Ellátandó lakóingatlanok száma jelenleg: 164 ingatlan. Gravitációs csatornahálózat és nyomás alatti csatornahálózat valamint nyomóvezetékek összesen: 6179 m. 3. RÉSZ: Telep megközelítését biztosító út építése (Próbaüzemmel nem érintett) Feladat az új Dabasi szennyvíztisztító telep megközelítését biztositó út építésének kivitelezése, mely a település jelenlegi külterületi részén helyezkedik el az 5. sz. elsőrendű főút és a 4604 j. országos közút közötti területen, Dabastól északi irányban. A 0129 hrsz út a 0+000-0+350 km szelvények között meglevő aszfalt burkolattal rendelkezik. Az út Dabas Alsóbesnyő településrész megközelítését teszi lehetővé. A meglevő út burkolatának szélessége általánosságban 4,2-4,6 méter, mely megnövelésre kerül úgy, hogy elbontás után új pályaszerkezet épül. A 0129 hrsz út 0+350 km szelvényt követő szakaszán, valamint a 0146 hrsz területen tervezett szakaszon a meglevő földút burkolattal történő ellátása szükséges.Main features of the procedureAz ajánlatok értékelésének szempontja valamennyi részajánlatban: a legjobb ár-érték arány. Az értékelési szempontonként az adható pontszámok alsó határa: 0 pont, a felső határa: 100 pont. A módszerek meghatározása, amellyel a ponthatárok közötti pontszám megadásra kerül: - Az 1. értékelési szempont (valamennyi részajánlatban): Nettó ajánlati ár esetén ajánlatkérő a fordított arányosítás módszerét alkalmazza a Közbeszerzési dokumentációban ismertett részletek, pontszámítási képlet szerint. - A 2-3-4. értékelési szempont az 1-2. részajánlatban, valamint a 2-3. értékelési szempont a 3. részajánlatban: Az M2a-b-c-d-e-f-g-h) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata esetén az egyenes arányosítás módszerét alkalmazza a Közbeszerzési dokumentációban ismertett részletek, pontszámítási képlet szerint. Az 1. részben: az M2.a), M2.b) és M2.c) pont, a 2. részben: az M2.d), M2.e) és M2.f) pont, a 3. részben az M2.g) és M2.h) pont szerinti szakember többlettapasztalata kerül értékelésre. - A 4. értékelési szempont a 3. részajánlatban: Többlet jótállás időtartama esetén az egyenes arányosítás módszerét alkalmazza a Közbeszerzési dokumentációban ismertett részletek, pontszámítási képlet szerint.

Contact information

Contact name

Kőszegi Zoltán

Contact phone

+36 29561282

Contact email

polgarmester@dabas.hu

Address

Szent István Tér 1/b., 2370 Dabas

• Nettó egyösszegű ajánlati ár

  44%

  Description

  Nettó egyösszegű ajánlati ár (Ft-ban)

• Szakember tapasztalat M2a

  6%

  Description

  Az M2a.) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata (min. 0, max. 24 hónap)

• Szakember tapasztalat M2b

  6%

  Description

  Az M2b.) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata (min. 0, max. 24 hónap)

• Szakember tapasztalat M2c

  6%

  Description

  Az M2c.) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata (min. 0, max. 24 hónap)

• Szakember tapasztalat M2d

  6%

  Description

  Az M2d.) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata (min. 0, max. 24 hónap)

• Szakember tapasztalat M2e

  6%

  Description

  Az M2e.) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata (min. 0, max. 24 hónap)

• Szakember tapasztalat M2f

  6%

  Description

  Az M2f.) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata (min. 0, max. 24 hónap)

• Szakember tapasztalat M2g

  6%

  Description

  Az M2g.) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata (min. 0, max. 24 hónap)

• Szakember tapasztalat M2h

  3%

  Description

  Az M2h.) szakember alkalmasságnál előírtat meghaladó többlet szakmai tapasztalata (min. 0, max. 24 hónap)

• Többlet jótállás időtartama

  9%

  Description

  Többlet jótállás időtartama (Az előírt kötelező 36 hónapot meghaladó többlet megajánlást kérjük megadni hónap mértékegységben; min. 0 max. 24 hónap)

• Minimum annual turnover

  Description

  The tenderer is unsuitable if their net turnover from the subject of the public procurement (from the activities defined below) for the three business years preceding the publication of the call for tenders does not reach: - For partial tender 1: net 5 billion HUF from wastewater and water utility construction (construction and/or renovation and/or conversion and/or expansion). For new market entrants, the prescribed values must be met during their operating period.

  Documentation Requirement

  The tenderer must attach a declaration signed by the person authorized to represent the company, stating their turnover from the subject of the public procurement (as described in the minimum requirements) for the last three business years preceding the publication of the call for tenders, depending on when the tenderer was established or started its activity, if these data are available. If the tenderer does not have the document according to Section 19 (1) c) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.) because it operates in a legal form for which the submission of a turnover declaration is not possible, it may prove its financial and economic suitability with any other declaration or document considered appropriate by the contracting authority instead of the suitability requirement and method of proof prescribed in point P.1.). The affected tenderer must substantiate during the request for additional information that it operates in a legal form for which the submission of the report or the turnover declaration is not possible and request information on the method of proving suitability accepted by the contracting authority instead of the suitability requirement and method of proof prescribed in point P.1.). According to Section 65 (6) of the Public Procurement Act, joint tenderers may jointly meet the requirement under point P.1.). Tenderers may also rely on the capacity of any other organization or person to meet the prescribed suitability requirements according to Section 65 (7) of the Public Procurement Act. The organization whose data the tenderer uses to prove economic and financial suitability is liable as a guarantor for the damage incurred by the contracting authority in connection with the tenderer's non-performance or faulty performance, as stipulated in Section 6:419 of the Civil Code. All documents serving to prove suitability must be submitted in simple copies. According to Section 1 (1) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.), the tenderer must preliminarily prove, by submitting the European Single Procurement Document, that it meets the suitability requirements specified by the contracting authority based on Section 65 of the Public Procurement Act. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration based on Section 2 (5) of VHR 321, and the detailed data of the suitability requirement do not need to be included in the European Single Procurement Document. Tenderers must submit the proof of suitability prescribed above at the request of the contracting authority according to Section 69 (4) of the Public Procurement Act. For all partial tenders, the P1., M1., M2. suitability requirements can be met jointly by joint tenderers, or by the tenderer relying on the capacity of any other organization or person according to Section 65 (7) of the Public Procurement Act. In this case, this organization must be indicated in the tender, and the suitability requirement for which the tenderer relies on the resources of this organization (also) must be indicated by referring to the relevant point of the call for tenders initiating the procedure. The organization providing its capacities must prove compliance with the given suitability condition in the same way as the prescribed methods of proof. The tender must also include a document containing the contractual or pre-contractual or other form of commitment undertaken by the organization providing its capacities, which confirms that the resources necessary for the performance of the contract will be available during the entire duration of the contract.

• Reference projects

  Description

  The tenderer is unsuitable for performing the contract if it does not have the following reference works completed within 5 years prior to the date of publication of the call for tenders, in accordance with Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.): - For partial tender 1: a.) A reference for the construction (new construction and/or renovation and/or conversion and/or expansion) of a wastewater treatment plant resulting in a minimum treatment capacity increase of 1000 m3/day, successfully concluded with a trial operation. The 1000 m3/day treatment capacity increase must be proven within the framework of one reference work.

  Documentation Requirement

  The tenderer must prove the minimum suitability requirement according to Section 21 (2) a) and Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.) on the method of proving suitability and exclusion grounds in public procurement procedures and defining the public procurement technical description, in the manner specified in Section 22 (3), with a certificate of reference works completed within 5 years prior to the date of publication of the call for tenders, issued by the other contracting party. According to Section 21 (2) a) and Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.), the contracting authority considers construction investments completed within the examined 5-year period, but started no more than 8 years ago. The certificate must include the name, address, telephone number, and email address of the other contracting party, the exact subject and quantity of the construction investment, the time of completion (start and end date) in year/month/day breakdown, the place of completion, and a declaration whether the performance was in accordance with the regulations and the contract. The reference certificate must clearly demonstrate compliance with the minimum requirements prescribed as a suitability condition. In case of performance as a contracting party in a joint tender, the reference certificate must contain the above data in such a way that the suitability of the tenderer (in this case, the organization providing the capacity) can be clearly established. The contracting authority only considers the tenderer's own performance when evaluating the reference. If a reference certificate for a construction investment performed by the winning joint tenderer cannot be issued by separating the works performed by the individual tenderers due to the indivisibility of the performance, the contracting authority accepts the reference certificate from any tenderer who participated in the performance in proportion to the remuneration received by the tenderer submitting the certificate based on the performance carried out by them. According to Section 1 (1) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.), the tenderer must preliminarily prove, by submitting the European Single Procurement Document, that it meets the suitability requirements specified by the contracting authority based on Section 65 of the Public Procurement Act. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration based on Section 2 (5) of VHR 321, and the detailed data of the suitability requirement do not need to be included in the European Single Procurement Document. Tenderers must submit the proof of suitability prescribed above at the request of the contracting authority according to Section 69 (4) of the Public Procurement Act. All documents serving to prove suitability must be submitted in simple copies. If the performance was not in accordance with the contract, the reason and extent of the deviation, as well as the fact whether the economic operator's liability for breach of contract exists, must be described in the certificate or declaration. If the suitability is proven by a declaration of the tenderer or another organization participating in the proof of suitability, the declaration must also state whether the other contracting party disputes the conformity of the performance with the contract or – if the economic operator has declared this – the circumstance that the economic operator's liability for breach of contract does not exist.

• Reference projects

  Description

  The tenderer is unsuitable for performing the contract if it does not have the following reference works completed within 5 years prior to the date of publication of the call for tenders, in accordance with Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.): - For partial tender 1: b.) Construction of a drain pipe network at least 10,000 m long (construction and/or renovation and/or conversion and/or expansion). The reference requirement can be proven with multiple references.

  Documentation Requirement

  The tenderer must prove the minimum suitability requirement according to Section 21 (2) a) and Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.) on the method of proving suitability and exclusion grounds in public procurement procedures and defining the public procurement technical description, in the manner specified in Section 22 (3), with a certificate of reference works completed within 5 years prior to the date of publication of the call for tenders, issued by the other contracting party. According to Section 21 (2) a) and Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.), the contracting authority considers construction investments completed within the examined 5-year period, but started no more than 8 years ago. The certificate must include the name, address, telephone number, and email address of the other contracting party, the exact subject and quantity of the construction investment, the time of completion (start and end date) in year/month/day breakdown, the place of completion, and a declaration whether the performance was in accordance with the regulations and the contract. The reference certificate must clearly demonstrate compliance with the minimum requirements prescribed as a suitability condition. In case of performance as a contracting party in a joint tender, the reference certificate must contain the above data in such a way that the suitability of the tenderer (in this case, the organization providing the capacity) can be clearly established. The contracting authority only considers the tenderer's own performance when evaluating the reference. If a reference certificate for a construction investment performed by the winning joint tenderer cannot be issued by separating the works performed by the individual tenderers due to the indivisibility of the performance, the contracting authority accepts the reference certificate from any tenderer who participated in the performance in proportion to the remuneration received by the tenderer submitting the certificate based on the performance carried out by them. According to Section 1 (1) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.), the tenderer must preliminarily prove, by submitting the European Single Procurement Document, that it meets the suitability requirements specified by the contracting authority based on Section 65 of the Public Procurement Act. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration based on Section 2 (5) of VHR 321, and the detailed data of the suitability requirement do not need to be included in the European Single Procurement Document. Tenderers must submit the proof of suitability prescribed above at the request of the contracting authority according to Section 69 (4) of the Public Procurement Act. All documents serving to prove suitability must be submitted in simple copies. If the performance was not in accordance with the contract, the reason and extent of the deviation, as well as the fact whether the economic operator's liability for breach of contract exists, must be described in the certificate or declaration. If the suitability is proven by a declaration of the tenderer or another organization participating in the proof of suitability, the declaration must also state whether the other contracting party disputes the conformity of the performance with the contract or – if the economic operator has declared this – the circumstance that the economic operator's liability for breach of contract does not exist.

• Reference projects

  Description

  The tenderer is unsuitable for performing the contract if it does not have the following reference works completed within 5 years prior to the date of publication of the call for tenders, in accordance with Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.): - For partial tender 1: c.) Planting (establishment and/or renovation and/or expansion) of a tree plantation containing at least 5000 trees. The reference requirement can be proven with multiple references.

  Documentation Requirement

  The tenderer must prove the minimum suitability requirement according to Section 21 (2) a) and Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.) on the method of proving suitability and exclusion grounds in public procurement procedures and defining the public procurement technical description, in the manner specified in Section 22 (3), with a certificate of reference works completed within 5 years prior to the date of publication of the call for tenders, issued by the other contracting party. According to Section 21 (2) a) and Section 21 (2a) a) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.), the contracting authority considers construction investments completed within the examined 5-year period, but started no more than 8 years ago. The certificate must include the name, address, telephone number, and email address of the other contracting party, the exact subject and quantity of the construction investment, the time of completion (start and end date) in year/month/day breakdown, the place of completion, and a declaration whether the performance was in accordance with the regulations and the contract. The reference certificate must clearly demonstrate compliance with the minimum requirements prescribed as a suitability condition. In case of performance as a contracting party in a joint tender, the reference certificate must contain the above data in such a way that the suitability of the tenderer (in this case, the organization providing the capacity) can be clearly established. The contracting authority only considers the tenderer's own performance when evaluating the reference. If a reference certificate for a construction investment performed by the winning joint tenderer cannot be issued by separating the works performed by the individual tenderers due to the indivisibility of the performance, the contracting authority accepts the reference certificate from any tenderer who participated in the performance in proportion to the remuneration received by the tenderer submitting the certificate based on the performance carried out by them. According to Section 1 (1) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X. 30.), the tenderer must preliminarily prove, by submitting the European Single Procurement Document, that it meets the suitability requirements specified by the contracting authority based on Section 65 of the Public Procurement Act. The contracting authority accepts a simple declaration based on Section 2 (5) of VHR 321, and the detailed data of the suitability requirement do not need to be included in the European Single Procurement Document. Tenderers must submit the proof of suitability prescribed above at the request of the contracting authority according to Section 69 (4) of the Public Procurement Act. All documents serving to prove suitability must be submitted in simple copies. If the performance was not in accordance with the contract, the reason and extent of the deviation, as well as the fact whether the economic operator's liability for breach of contract exists, must be described in the certificate or declaration. If the suitability is proven by a declaration of the tenderer or another organization participating in the proof of suitability, the declaration must also state whether the other contracting party disputes the conformity of the performance with the contract or – if the economic operator has declared this – the circumstance that the economic operator's liability for breach of contract does not exist.

• Technical personnel with MV-É qualification

  Description

  The tenderer (AT) is unsuitable for performing the contract if it does not have at least the following experts (to be involved in the performance): For partial tender 1: M2a.) At least 1 person who has the MV-É (construction field) qualification according to Government Decree 266/2013 (VII. 11.).

  Documentation Requirement

  AT must present the experts it intends to involve in the performance according to Section 21 (2) b) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.). Documents to be attached: a.) The expert's professionally signed CV, detailing their professional experience in such a way that it clearly demonstrates the fulfillment of the suitability condition prescribed in point M2 a-b-c.), includes a declaration of availability for the performance period, and states that they are aware of their involvement in the procedure. It must also include the calculation of the professional practice period (which is known from the CV template in the Public Procurement Documentation; the practice must be given in year/month detail). b.) Documents proving qualification/education. In the case of M2 a-b-c.) experts, suitability can also be proven by the existence of chamber qualification, in which case the professional practice qualification must be clearly stated with a register/chamber registration number so that it can be clearly identified. If the presented expert is already listed in the chamber register proving professional practice qualification, the presentation of professional practice period in the CV and the attachment of the school diploma/certificate is not necessary for this expert, the contracting authority automatically considers that the given expert has the professional practice period and education prescribed in the suitability requirement based on the fact of their registration. The burden and responsibility of proving the equivalence of education and/or qualification lies with the AT. The contracting authority checks the existence of practical experience based on the CV for M2 a-b-c.) experts, if they are not yet listed in the chamber register. In view of the evaluation criterion related to M2 a-b-c.) experts, the tenderer must submit the documents necessary for checking the suitability requirement (presenting both the experience relevant for suitability and the additional experience relevant for evaluation in the CV) already in the tender, if a bid greater than 0 is made for the given expert. The name of the expert to be bid on cannot be supplemented, so if the name of the expert is not provided in case of a bid greater than 0, it will result in the invalidity of the tender!

• Technical personnel with MV-VZ qualification

  Description

  The tenderer (AT) is unsuitable for performing the contract if it does not have at least the following experts (to be involved in the performance): For partial tender 1: M2b.) At least 1 person who has the MV-VZ (Water Management Structures field) qualification according to Government Decree 266/2013 (VII. 11.).

  Documentation Requirement

  AT must present the experts it intends to involve in the performance according to Section 21 (2) b) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.). Documents to be attached: a.) The expert's professionally signed CV, detailing their professional experience in such a way that it clearly demonstrates the fulfillment of the suitability condition prescribed in point M2 a-b-c.), includes a declaration of availability for the performance period, and states that they are aware of their involvement in the procedure. It must also include the calculation of the professional practice period (which is known from the CV template in the Public Procurement Documentation; the practice must be given in year/month detail). b.) Documents proving qualification/education. In the case of M2 a-b-c.) experts, suitability can also be proven by the existence of chamber qualification, in which case the professional practice qualification must be clearly stated with a register/chamber registration number so that it can be clearly identified. If the presented expert is already listed in the chamber register proving professional practice qualification, the presentation of professional practice period in the CV and the attachment of the school diploma/certificate is not necessary for this expert, the contracting authority automatically considers that the given expert has the professional practice period and education prescribed in the suitability requirement based on the fact of their registration. The burden and responsibility of proving the equivalence of education and/or qualification lies with the AT. The contracting authority checks the existence of practical experience based on the CV for M2 a-b-c.) experts, if they are not yet listed in the chamber register. In view of the evaluation criterion related to M2 a-b-c.) experts, the tenderer must submit the documents necessary for checking the suitability requirement (presenting both the experience relevant for suitability and the additional experience relevant for evaluation in the CV) already in the tender, if a bid greater than 0 is made for the given expert. The name of the expert to be bid on cannot be supplemented, so if the name of the expert is not provided in case of a bid greater than 0, it will result in the invalidity of the tender!

• Technical personnel with MV-ÉG qualification

  Description

  The tenderer (AT) is unsuitable for performing the contract if it does not have at least the following experts (to be involved in the performance): For partial tender 1: M2c.) At least 1 person who has the MV-ÉG (building engineering field) qualification according to Government Decree 266/2013 (VII. 11.).

  Documentation Requirement

  AT must present the experts it intends to involve in the performance according to Section 21 (2) b) of Government Decree 321/2015 (X.30.). Documents to be attached: a.) The expert's professionally signed CV, detailing their professional experience in such a way that it clearly demonstrates the fulfillment of the suitability condition prescribed in point M2 a-b-c.), includes a declaration of availability for the performance period, and states that they are aware of their involvement in the procedure. It must also include the calculation of the professional practice period (which is known from the CV template in the Public Procurement Documentation; the practice must be given in year/month detail). b.) Documents proving qualification/education. In the case of M2 a-b-c.) experts, suitability can also be proven by the existence of chamber qualification, in which case the professional practice qualification must be clearly stated with a register/chamber registration number so that it can be clearly identified. If the presented expert is already listed in the chamber register proving professional practice qualification, the presentation of professional practice period in the CV and the attachment of the school diploma/certificate is not necessary for this expert, the contracting authority automatically considers that the given expert has the professional practice period and education prescribed in the suitability requirement based on the fact of their registration. The burden and responsibility of proving the equivalence of education and/or qualification lies with the AT. The contracting authority checks the existence of practical experience based on the CV for M2 a-b-c.) experts, if they are not yet listed in the chamber register. In view of the evaluation criterion related to M2 a-b-c.) experts, the tenderer must submit the documents necessary for checking the suitability requirement (presenting both the experience relevant for suitability and the additional experience relevant for evaluation in the CV) already in the tender, if a bid greater than 0 is made for the given expert. The name of the expert to be bid on cannot be supplemented, so if the name of the expert is not provided in case of a bid greater than 0, it will result in the invalidity of the tender!

See the full notice