Food & Beverage - 1 location
Kantiner og cateringtjenester
Københavns Lufthavne A/S (CPH) søger en leverandør til en lejeaftale inden for Food & Beverage-segmentet i Københavns omegn, med en maksimal totalværdi på 360 millioner DKK. Aftalen omfatter restaurant- og serveringstjenester. Tilbud evalueres på pris (50%) og kvalitet (50%). Kvalitetskriterierne omfatter koncept (50%), der vurderes ud fra brandoplevelse, F&B-menu, layout, design og atmosfære samt serviceoplevelse, og forretningsplan (50%), der vurderes ud fra operationel opsætning, brandkvalitet og forretningsplanens levedygtighed. Som kvalifikationskrav skal tilbudsgiver have mindst tre sammenlignelige referencer til Food & Beverage-operationer i lufthavne, hvor referencerne skal have en kontraktlængde på mindst to år og have været gældende inden for de seneste tre år før den oprindelige tilbudsfrist.
About the bid
- Contact name
- Ea Meyer
- Contact phone
- +45 28707014
- Contact email
- ea.plaugmann@cph.dk
These tender conditions apply to Københavns Lufthavne A/S’ (hereinafter ”CPH”) invitation to tender for 1 Lease agreement within the F&B segment under the Concession Directive (2014/23/EU) according to the concession notice published in Tenders Electronic Daily (TED).Main features of the procedureThe tender procedure will be conducted as a negotiated procedure without prequalification. CPH reserves the right, during the course of the negotiations, to reduce the number of tenderers participating in the negotiations. The number may already be reduced on the basis of the first tenders. CPH reserves the possibility to award the lease agreements on the basis of the initial and all subsequent tenders received. If so, the tenders will be evaluated in accordance with the tender conditions. CPH is therefore entitled, but not obliged, to negotiate.
Custom Assessment Criteria
Start a free trial to ask your own questions about the tender and get AI-generated answers.
Award Criteria
Description
The tenderer must complete and submit Annex A (Financial offer). All blanks marked yellow in Annex A must be filled out by the tenderer. The overall assessment of “Financial” is based on the following two (2) sub-sub-criteria and is calculated with two significant decimal places. The sub-sub-criteria are evaluated separately. No indexation is applied for evaluation purposes. All prices must be quoted in Danish kroner (DKK) excluding VAT (but including any other indirect taxes).
Sub-criteria
Description
The tenderer must state the offered concession fee percentage in Annex A (Financial offer), the offered concession fee (%) for both sales and purchase of currencies. When assessing “Concession fee (%)”, emphasis will be placed on as high a value as possible. The minimum acceptable concession fee is 24 %. Tenders offering an effective concession fee below 24 % will not be eligible for contract award.
Evaluation Method
CPH will use a scoring system in which the concession fee is translated into scores ranging from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 10 points: * The tenderer offering the highest concession fee will achieve the maximum score of 10 points. * A concession fee of 24 % or below will receive 0 points. Tenders offering a concession fee below 24 % will not be eligible for contract award. * All other tenderers will be scored based on a linear interpolation between these two values.
Description
The tenderer must state the offered minimum annual rent per international departing passenger (“IDP”) in Annex A (Financial offer), which is fixed in the duration of the full contract period. The minimum annual rent (per IDP) will serve as the minimum guaranteed payment to CPH. The estimated IDP in the Financial offer (Annex A) for the lease period, provided by CPH, is not binding. When assessing “Minimum annual rent (per IDP)”, emphasis will be placed on as high a minimum annual rent per IDP as possible. The minimum acceptable minimum annual rent (per IDP) is 0.52 DKK. The minimum annual rent per IDP must be quoted in Danish kroner (DKK) excl. VAT (but including any other indirect taxes, duties etc.)
Evaluation Method
CPH will use a scoring system in which the minimum annual rent (per IDP) is translated into scores ranging from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 10 points: * The tenderer offering the highest minimum annual rent (per IDP) will achieve the maximum score of 10 points. * An offered minimum annual rent of 0.52 DKK per IDP or below will receive 0 points. Tenders offering a minimum annual rent (per IDP) below 0.52 DKK (per IDP) will not be eligible for contract award. * All other tenderers will be scored based on a linear interpolation between these two values.
Description
The overall assessment of “Quality” is based on the following sub-sub-criteria. The sub-sub criteria will be evaluated separately and only whole points will be awarded for each sub-sub-criteria. The sub-sub-criteria are further described below as well as on slide 25-26 in CPH introduction and tender brief.
Sub-criteria
Description
The assessment of “Concept” will be based on the tenderer’s description of the offered concept and will focus on: 1. Brand Experience: The concept will be evaluated on the overall strength and coherence of the proposed Brand Experience as set out in the CPH introduction and tender brief — including its alignment with the unique airport F&B environment, and how convincingly the brand delivers a distinct and memorable experience that contributes to bringing CPH’s F&B vision to life. 2. F&B Menu: The concept will be evaluated on the overall strength and coherence of the proposed F&B menu as set out in the CPH introduction and tender brief — including how convincingly the menu composition, menu quality and commercial logic creates a relevant and commercially strong offer. 3. Layout: The concept will be evaluated on the overall strength and coherence of the proposed layout as set out in the CPH introduction and tender brief — including how convincingly the layout ensures enjoyable guest experiences and an operationally efficient and commercially strong configuration suited to the airport environment. 4. Design & Ambience: The concept will be evaluated on the overall strength and coherence of the proposed design and ambience as set out in the CPH introduction and tender brief — including how convincingly the concept design and use of sensory elements bring the brand experience to life, create an inviting atmosphere, and feel like a natural extension of the CPH terminal architecture and design. 5. Service Experience: The concept will be evaluated on the overall strength and coherence of the proposed service experience as set out in the CPH introduction and tender brief — including how convincingly the service philosophy, staff engagement and guest facing digital solutions elevate the guest experience. Please note the recommended length of the description as specified under section 12.1.
Description
The assessment of “Business plan” will be based on the tenderer’s description of the offered business plan and will focus on: 1. Operational Set up: The business plan will be evaluated on the overall strength and coherence of the proposed operational setup as set out in the CPH introduction and tender brief — including how convincingly the operational capabilities, use of technology and data driven approaches ensure a reliable and commercially strong performance. 2. Brand Quality: The business plan will be evaluated on how convincingly the quality governance, commitment to innovation and approach to sustainability ensure a consistent and future‑oriented foundation that supports strong performance over time. 3. Viability of business plan: The viability of the business plan will be evaluated on how the submitted description demonstrates an ability to operate a sustainable and commercially sound unit at CPH, and on how convincingly intended investments and key operational and cost drivers support the brand experience and commercial performance. Tenderers shall submit financial key figures in Annex J (P&L) to substantiate the underlying assumptions of the business plan. Such figures will not be evaluated as standalone quantitative parameters but will be considered solely insofar as they support the assessment of the viability of the business plan. Please note the recommended length of the description as specified under section 12.1.
Qualification requirements
Description
Leverandøren må ha minst tre (3) sammenlignbare referanser for mat- og drikkevarevirksomhet på flyplass(er). Referansene kan gjelde samme flyplass, men fra forskjellige enheter. Referansene må gjelde direkte ansvar for daglig F&B-drift. Enheter på København lufthavn er tillatt som referanse. Referansene må ha en kontraktslengde på minst to (2) år. For at en referanse skal være gyldig, må den ha vært i kraft innen de siste tre (3) årene før datoen for den opprinnelige tilbudsfristen. Datoen for levering beregnes fra referansens utløpsdato. Pågående referanser aksepteres hvis referansen har vært pågående i minimum 2 år. Referansekravet kan oppfylles gjennom referanser der leverandøren har vært leverandør eller underleverandør. Det avgjørende er at leverandøren har utført arbeidet som referansen omfatter. For konsortier må konsortiemedlemmene samlet oppfylle minimumskravet. For leverandører som baserer seg på andre økonomiske aktørers tekniske og faglige egnethet, må leverandøren og den forpliktede enheten samlet oppfylle minimumskravet.
Documentation Requirement
Leverandøren kan i sitt ESPD kun oppgi egne referanser, dvs. for den spesifikke juridiske enheten (f.eks. selskapet) det gjelder. Dette betyr for eksempel at konsernselskapers referanser kun kan vurderes dersom leverandøren baserer seg på de aktuelle konsernselskapene i forhold til egnethet og dersom separate ESPD-er og forpliktelseserklæringer leveres for disse konsernselskapene.
Previous Contract Winners
Start a free trial to see who has won similar tenders for this buyer.
See the full notice
- Contracting authority
- Københavns Lufthavne A/S
- Title
- Food & Beverage - 1 location
- Type
- Main code
- Supplemental codes
- Location
- Københavns omegn
- Estimated value
- DKK 360,000,000.00
No supplemental codes from buyer…